Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payne, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Massie, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Payne, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Massie, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Breast

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 7, Issue 2 150-154, Copyright © 2000 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Women's regrets after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy

D. K. Payne, C. Biggs, K. N. Tran, P. I. Borgen and M. J. Massie
Barbara White Fishman Center for Psychological Counseling of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA. payned@mskcc.org

BACKGROUND: Primary prevention strategies such as chemopreventive agents (e.g., tamoxifen) and bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (PM) have received increasingly more attention as management options for women at high risk of developing breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 370 women, who had registered in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center National Prophylactic Mastectomy Registry, reported having undergone a bilateral PM. Twenty-one of these women expressed regrets about their decision to have a PM. A psychiatrist and psychologist interviewed 19 of the women about their experiences with the PM. RESULTS: A physician-initiated rather than patient-initiated discussion about the PM represented the most common factor in these women. Psychological distress and the unavailability of psychological and rehabilitative support throughout the process were the most commonly reported regrets. Additional regrets about the PM related to cosmesis, perceived difficulty of detecting breast cancer in the remaining breast tissue, surgical complications, residual pain, lack of education about the procedure, concerns about consequent body image, and sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Although a PM statistically reduces the chances of a woman developing breast cancer, the possibility of significant physical and psychological sequelae remains. Careful evaluation, education, and support both before and after the procedure will potentially reduce the level of distress and dissatisfaction in these women. We discuss recommendations for the appropriate surgical and psychiatric evaluation of women who are considering a PM as risk-reducing surgery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
Y. Brandberg, K. Sandelin, S. Erikson, G. Jurell, A. Liljegren, A. Lindblom, A. Linden, A. von Wachenfeldt, M. Wickman, and B. Arver
Psychological Reactions, Quality of Life, and Body Image After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women At High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Prospective 1-Year Follow-Up Study
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2008; 26(24): 3943 - 3949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. M. Geiger, C. N. West, L. Nekhlyudov, L. J. Herrinton, I.-L. A. Liu, A. Altschuler, S. J. Rolnick, E. L. Harris, S. M. Greene, J. G. Elmore, et al.
Contentment With Quality of Life Among Breast Cancer Survivors With and Without Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2006; 24(9): 1350 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
L. Nekhlyudov, M. Bower, L. J. Herrinton, A. Altschuler, S. M. Greene, S. Rolnick, J. G. Elmore, E. L. Harris, A. Liu, K. M. Emmons, et al.
Women's Decision-Making Roles Regarding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, November 1, 2005; 2005(35): 55 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Cullen, M. D. Schwartz, W. F. Lawrence, J. V. Selby, and J. S. Mandelblatt
Short-Term Impact of Cancer Prevention and Screening Activities on Quality of Life
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 22(5): 943 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
M. Gurevich, G. M. Devins, C. Wilson, D. McCready, C. R. Marmar, and G. M. Rodin
Stress Response Syndromes in Women Undergoing Mammography: A Comparison of Women With and Without a History of Breast Cancer
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2004; 66(1): 104 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. van Oostrom, H. Meijers-Heijboer, L. N. Lodder, H. J. Duivenvoorden, A. R. van Gool, C. Seynaeve, C. A. van der Meer, J. G.M. Klijn, B. N. van Geel, C. W. Burger, et al.
Long-Term Psychological Impact of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation and Prophylactic Surgery: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3867 - 3874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. D. Schwartz, B. N. Peshkin, C. Hughes, D. Main, C. Isaacs, and C. Lerman
Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing on Psychologic Distress in a Clinic-Based Sample
J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2002; 20(2): 514 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
L. A. Newman, H. M. Kuerer, K. K. Hunt, G. Vlastos, F. C. Ames, M. I. Ross, and S. E. Singletary
Educational Review: Role of the Surgeon in Hereditary Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 8(4): 368 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.