Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muller, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Meijer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muller, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Meijer, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sentinel lymph node

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 7, Issue 6 461-468, Copyright © 2000 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Reliability of the sentinel node procedure in melanoma patients: analysis of failures after long-term follow-up

M. G. Muller, P. J. Borgstein, R. Pijpers, P. A. van Leeuwen, P. J. van Diest, A. Gupta and S. Meijer
Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUNDS: The sentinel node (SN) concept assumes that early lymphatic metastases, if present, always are found first in the SN. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of this procedure by establishing the success rate and number of failed procedures during a follow-up period of at least 2 years. METHODS: From August 1993 to November 1996, 204 consecutive patients with stage I and II cutaneous melanoma underwent SN biopsy by a triple technique. Preoperatively, all patients underwent (dynamic) lymphoscintigraphy. A gamma probe and blue dye helped localize the SN(s) during surgery, and these nodes subsequently were excised. These lymph nodes were step-sectioned and examined by routine and immunohistochemical staining. If the SN contained tumor cells, a lymphadenectomy was performed at a later date. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 42 months. The success rate was 99%. Three patients developed a recurrence in the negative SN basin during follow-up, without simultaneous appearance of (locoregional) metastases. CONCLUSIONS: With a 99% success rate and a 1.5% rate of failed SN procedures (7% false-negative rate) after a median follow-up of 3.5 years, we concluded that the combined triple technique approach of detecting the SN was a reliable method to accurately identify and retrieve the SN.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. G. Molenkamp, B. J.R. Sluijter, P. A.M. van Leeuwen, S. J.A.M. Santegoets, S. Meijer, P. G.J.T.B. Wijnands, J. B.A.G. Haanen, A. J.M. van den Eertwegh, R. J. Scheper, and T. D. de Gruijl
Local Administration of PF-3512676 CpG-B Instigates Tumor-Specific CD8+ T-Cell Reactivity in Melanoma Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4532 - 4542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. Beavis, M. Dawson, P. Doble, R. A. Scolyer, R. Bourne, L.-X. L. Li, R. Murali, J. R. Stretch, C. L. Lean, R. F. Uren, et al.
Confirmation of Sentinel Lymph Node Identity by Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy Samples Using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 15(3): 934 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
B. G. Molenkamp, B. J. R. Sluijter, B. Oosterhof, S. Meijer, and P. A. M. van Leeuwen
Non-Radical Diagnostic Biopsies Do Not Negatively Influence Melanoma Patient Survival
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2007; 14(4): 1424 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
Z. I. Nowecki, P. Rutkowski, A. Nasierowska-Guttmejer, and W. Ruka
Survival Analysis and Clinicopathological Factors Associated With False-Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Findings in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 13(12): 1655 - 1663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. J.C.L.M. Vuylsteke, B. G. Molenkamp, P. A.M. van Leeuwen, S. Meijer, P. G.J.T.B. Wijnands, J. B.A.G. Haanen, R. J. Scheper, and T. D. de Gruijl
Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Reactivity in the Sentinel Lymph Node of GM-CSF-Treated Stage I Melanoma Patients is Associated with High Myeloid Dendritic Cell Content.
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 12(9): 2826 - 2833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. Vaquerano, W. G. Kraybill, D. L. Driscoll, R. Cheney, and J. M. Kane III
American Joint Committee on Cancer Clinical Stage as a Selection Criterion for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2006; 13(2): 198 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
N. Nathansohn, J. Schachter, and H. Gutman
Patterns of Recurrence in Patients With Melanoma After Radical Lymph Node Dissection
Arch Surg, December 1, 2005; 140(12): 1172 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. J. C. L. M. Vuylsteke, P. J. Borgstein, P. A. M. van Leeuwen, H. A. Gietema, B. G. Molenkamp, M. G. S. Muller, P. J. van Diest, J. R. M. van der Sijp, and S. Meijer
Sentinel Lymph Node Tumor Load: An Independent Predictor of Additional Lymph Node Involvement and Survival in Melanoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 12(6): 440 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. J. C. L. M. Vuylsteke, B. G. Molenkamp, H. A. Gietema, P. A. M. van Leeuwen, P. G. J. T. B. Wijnands, W. Vos, P. J. van Diest, R. J. Scheper, S. Meijer, and T. D. de Gruijl
Local Administration of Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor Increases the Number and Activation State of Dendritic Cells in the Sentinel Lymph Node of Early-Stage Melanoma
Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 64(22): 8456 - 8460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
H A Gietema, R J C L M Vuylsteke, I A de Jonge, P A M van Leeuwen, B G Molenkamp, J R M van der Sijp, S Meijer, and P J van Diest
Sentinel lymph node investigation in melanoma: detailed analysis of the yield from step sectioning and immunohistochemistry
J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2004; 57(6): 618 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. A. Scolyer, J. F. Thompson, L.-X. L. Li, A. Beavis, M. Dawson, P. Doble, V. S. K. Ka, J. Gregory McKinnon, R. Soper, R. F. Uren, et al.
Failure to Remove True Sentinel Nodes Can Cause Failure of the Sentinel Node Biopsy Technique: Evidence from Antimony Concentrations in False-Negative Sentinel Nodes from Melanoma Patients
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 11(3_suppl): 174S - 178S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. H. Estourgie, O. E. Nieweg, R. A. Valdes Olmos, C. A. Hoefnagel, and B. B. R. Kroon
Review and Evaluation of Sentinel Node Procedures in 250 Melanoma Patients With a Median Follow-Up of 6 Years
Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2003; 10(6): 681 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
G Cserni
Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas and sentinel nodes
J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2003; 56(5): 327 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
G S Mijnhout, O S Hoekstra, A van Lingen, P J van Diest, H J Ader, A A Lammertsma, R Pijpers, S Meijer, and G J J Teule
How morphometric analysis of metastatic load predicts the (un)usefulness of PET scanning: the case of lymph node staging in melanoma
J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2003; 56(4): 283 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R.J.C.L.M. Vuylsteke, P.A.M. van Leeuwen, M.G. S. Muller, H.A. Gietema, D.R. Kragt, and S. Meijer
Clinical Outcome of Stage I/II Melanoma Patients After Selective Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection: Long-Term Follow-Up Results
J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2003; 21(6): 1057 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
I. A. Jacobs, C. K. Chang, T. K. DasGupta, and G. Salti
High Isotope Counts and Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients With Melanoma
Arch Surg, January 1, 2003; 138(1): 63 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.