Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubio, I. T.
Right arrow Articles by Singletary, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubio, I. T.
Right arrow Articles by Singletary, S. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 7, Issue 7 544-548, Copyright © 2000 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Role of specimen radiography in patients treated with skin-sparing mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

I. T. Rubio, N. Mirza, A. A. Sahin, G. Whitman, S. S. Kroll, F. C. Ames and S. E. Singletary
Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.

BACKGROUND: Specimen radiography is an important part of breast conservation surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The objective of this study was to determine whether mastectomy specimen radiography could help in obtaining negative resection margins in patients with DCIS undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). METHODS: Of 95 patients treated at our institution with SSM and IBR for DCIS, 35 had specimen radiography. The mastectomy specimen was first examined grossly and then inked, serially sectioned, and sent for radiographic assessment. Tissue slices containing calcifications were identified for pathologic evaluation. Additional tissue was excised if tumor was found near the inked margins or if calcifications were found near the radiographic margins. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients who had specimen radiography, the radiographic margins were free of calcifications in 30 patients (86%); of these patients, the margins on the final histologic examination were free of tumor in 27 and within 1 mm in 3. The other five patients (14%) had calcifications close to the radiographic margin; four underwent an intraoperative re-excision, but the margin for one of those four patients was still positive on final histologic examination. Margins were found to be negative by both mastectomy specimen radiography and histology in 77% of the patients. Of the 95 patients with DCIS, three patients (3%), none of whom had specimen radiography, developed local recurrences. One of these was successfully re-treated, one died as a result of synchronous distant metastases, and one was lost to follow-up. At a median follow-up time of 3.7 years, 93 patients (98%) were alive and free of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative radiography of mastectomy specimens may be useful for assessing margin status and for identifying the location of microcalcifications within tissue slices.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
N. Cabioglu, K. K. Hunt, A. A. Sahin, H. M. Kuerer, G. V. Babiera, S. E. Singletary, G. J. Whitman, M. I. Ross, F. C. Ames, B. W. Feig, et al.
Role for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2007; 14(4): 1458 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. A. Newman and H. M. Kuerer
Advances in Breast Conservation Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1685 - 1697.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. E. Singletary and G. L. Robb
Oncologic Safety of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2003; 10(2): 95 - 97.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
G. W. Carlson, T. M. Styblo, R. H. Lyles, J. Bostwick, D. R. Murray, C. A. Staley, and W. C. Wood
Local Recurrence After Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Tumor Biology or Surgical Conservatism?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2003; 10(2): 108 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.