| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
1 cm Distal Margins Sufficient?
From the Departments of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University of Missouri Ellis Fischel Cancer Center and Harry S. Truman VAMC, Columbia, Missouri.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Boris W. Kuvshinoff, MD, FACS, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, 115 Business Loop 70 W, Columbia, MO 65203; Fax: 573-884-6054; E-mail: Kuvshinoffb{at}health.missouri.edu
Background: Sphincter-sparing alternatives to abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the treatment of rectal cancer often are underused out of concern for inadequate distal margins and local failure. The present study addresses whether sphincter-sparing techniques with distal margins 
1 cm adversely influence oncological outcome in patients given preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Methods: Thirty-seven patients with rectal cancer 8 cm from the anal verge were enrolled in the study. Preoperative external beam radiotherapy (5400 Gy) was administered together with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2/day). Surgical resection was performed in 36 patients with pathological assessment of tumor response and margins. Patients with sphincter-sparing resection and distal margins > 1 cm or 1 cm and those who underwent APR were compared.
Results: Thirty-six patients completed preoperative chemoradiotherapy, with successful sphincter-preservation in 28 patients. At a median follow-up of 33 months, there were 12 recurrences overall, which included 11 distant failures and four pelvic failures. Disease-free survival (DFS) was not different between those who had an APR compared with sphincter-sparing resection with distal margins 1 cm. DFS was worse (P < .02) when radial margins were 3 mm compared with > 3 mm.
Conclusions: Sphincter preservation is feasible in more than 75% of patients with tumors 8 cm from the anal verge after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Sphincter-sparing surgery with distal margins 1 cm can be used without adversely influencing local recurrence or DFS. Limited radial margins ( 3 mm), however, are associated with increased disease recurrence.
Key Words: Rectal cancer • Distal margins • Radiation therapy • Chemotherapy • Sphincter preservation
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. Glynne-Jones and M. Harrison Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence for Induction Chemoradiation? Oncologist, November 1, 2007; 12(11): 1309 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. B. Neuman, D. Schrag, C. Cabral, M. R. Weiser, P. B. Paty, J. G. Guillem, B. D. Minsky, W. D. Wong, and L. K. Temple Can Differences in Bowel Function After Surgery for Rectal Cancer Be Identified by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Instrument? Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 14(5): 1727 - 1734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Han and S. Galandiuk Induction Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer Arch Surg, December 1, 2006; 141(12): 1246 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Rengan, P. Paty, W. D. Wong, J. Guillem, M. Weiser, L. Temple, L. Saltz, and B. D. Minsky Distal cT2N0 Rectal Cancer: Is There an Alternative to Abdominoperineal Resection? J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 23(22): 4905 - 4912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Paraskeva, S. Purkayastha, and A. Darzi Laparoscopy for Malignancy: Current Status Surgical Innovation, March 1, 2004; 11(1): 27 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. G. Moore, E. Riedel, B. D. Minsky, L. Saltz, P. Paty, D. Wong, A. M. Cohen, and J. G. Guillem Adequacy of 1-cm Distal Margin After Restorative Rectal Cancer Resection With Sharp Mesorectal Excision and Preoperative Combined-Modality Therapy Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2003; 10(1): 80 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
