| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr. Darlene M. Miltenburg, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6550 Fannin, Suite 1661, Houston, Texas 77030; Fax: 713-798-8367; E-mail: darlenem{at}bcm.tmc.edu
Background: Somatostatin analogues appear to have antiproliferative effects in breast cancer by inhibiting various hormones. Several small phase 1 and 2 clinical trails have evaluated the efficacy of somatostatin analogues, but the results are varied. The purpose of this study was to use the technique of meta-analysis to determine the effect of somatostatin analogues on tumor response, toxicity, and serum hormone levels in women with metastatic breast cancer.
Methods: All published and unpublished trials were reviewed. Meta-analysis was preformed by best linear unbiased estimate regression with observations weighted inversely to their variance. Significance was considered at P < .05.
Results: Fourteen studies (N = 210) were included. Positive tumor response was reported in 87 patients (41.4%). Mean duration of response was 3.9 months. Response was best when somatostatin analogues were given as first-line therapy (69.5% versus 28.5%, P < .006) and in patients with
2 metastases (45.0% versus 5.6%, P = .3). Mild side effects occurred in 47 of 185 patients (25.4%). Therapy was associated with a decrease in serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and an increase in growth hormone.
Conclusions: In patients with metastatic breast cancer, treatment with somatostatin analogues was associated with a tumor response of over 40% with few side effects. Best results were achieved when somatostatin analogues were given as first-line therapy.
Key Words: Breast cancer Somatostatin Octreotide Somatuline Lanreotide Treatment Outcomes Meta-analysis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. H. Gunn, J. E. Schwimer, M. Cox, C. T. Anthony, M. S. O'Dorisio, and E. A. Woltering In Vitro Modeling of the Clinical Interactions Between Octreotide and 111In-Pentetreotide: Is There Evidence of Somatostatin Receptor Downregulation? J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 354 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Canzian, J. D. McKay, R. J. Cleveland, L. Dossus, C. Biessy, C. Boillot, S. Rinaldi, M. Llewellyn, V. Chajes, F. Clavel-Chapelon, et al. Genetic Variation in the Growth Hormone Synthesis Pathway in Relation to Circulating Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3, and Breast Cancer Risk: Results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2316 - 2325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nahta, G. N. Hortobagyi, and F. J. Esteva Growth Factor Receptors in Breast Cancer: Potential for Therapeutic Intervention Oncologist, February 1, 2003; 8(1): 5 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |