Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Min, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Min, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Annals of Surgical Oncology 8:402-406 (2001)
© 2001 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Impact of Splenectomy for Lymph Node Dissection on Long-Term Surgical Outcome in Gastric Cancer

Kang Young Lee, MD, Sung Hoon Noh, MD, Woo Jin Hyung, MD, Jun Ho Lee, MD, Ki Hyeok Lah, MD, Seung Ho Choi, MD and Jin Sik Min, MD, PhD

From the Department of Surgery (KYL, SHN WJH, JHL, KHL, SHC, JSM) and Cancer Metastasis Research Center (SHN, WJH, JHL), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Sung Hoon Noh, MD, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, CPO Box 8044, Seoul, Korea; Fax: 82-2-313-8289; E-mail: sunghoonn{at}yumc.yonsei.ac.kr

Background: In the treatment of gastric cancer, splenectomy is performed for effective lymph node dissection around the splenic artery and splenic hilum. The purpose of this study was to clarify the long-term outcome of splenectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Methods: The effect of splenectomy on recurrence and prognosis was examined in a retrospective analysis of 665 patients who had undergone curative total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma from 1987 to 1996. The risk factors associated with recurrence and prognosis were investigated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: The splenectomy group showed more advanced lesions and a higher recurrence rate than the spleen-preserved group. However, after adjusting for the TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) stage, there was no significant difference in recurrence rate and pattern between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that gross type, serosal invasion, and nodal metastasis were independent risk factors for recurrence while splenectomy was not. When comparing patients with the same TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) stages, no significant difference in the 5-year survival rates was apparent. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, serosal invasion, and nodal metastasis were independent prognostic factors whereas splenectomy was not.

Conclusions: These data suggest that splenectomy for lymph node dissection in gastric cancer is not effective regarding long-term patient prognosis.

Key Words: Splenectomy • Lymph node dissection • Long-term outcome • Gastric cancer







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.