Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vlastos, G.
Right arrow Articles by Singletary, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vlastos, G.
Right arrow Articles by Singletary, S. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Annals of Surgical Oncology 8:425-431 (2001)
© 2001 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Feasibility of Breast Preservation in the Treatment of Occult Primary Carcinoma Presenting With Axillary Metastases

Georges Vlastos, MD, Marina E. Jean, MD, Attiqa N. Mirza, MD, Nadeem Q. Mirza, MD, MPH, Henry M. Kuerer, MD, PhD, Frederick C. Ames, MD, Kelly K. Hunt, MD, Merrick I. Ross, MD, Thomas A. Buchholz, MD, Aman U. Buzdar, MD and S. Eva Singletary, MD

From the Departments of Surgical Oncology (GV, MEJ, ANM, NQM, HMK, FCA, KKH, MIR, SES), Radiation Oncology (TAB), and Breast Medical Oncology (AUB), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: S. Eva Singletary, MD, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 444, Houston TX 77030; Fax: 713-792-2225.

Background: The objective of the study was to compare the treatment outcomes in patients with occult primary carcinoma with axillary lymph node metastasis who were treated with mastectomy or with intent to preserve the breast.

Methods: From 1951 to 1998, 479 female patients were registered with axillary lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary. After clinical workup, including mammography, 45 patients retained this diagnosis and received treatment for T0 N1–2 M0 carcinoma of the breast. Clinical and pathological data were collected retrospectively, and survival was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up time was 7 years.

Results: Median age was 54 years (range, 32–79). Clinical nodal status was N1 in 71% and N2 in 29% of the patients. Surgical treatment was mastectomy in 29% and an intent to preserve the breast in 71% of the patients. Locoregional radiotherapy was used in 71% and systemic chemoendocrine therapy was used in 73% of the patients. Of the 13 mastectomy patients, only one had a primary tumor discovered in the specimen. Two patients (4%) were ultimately diagnosed with lung cancer and neuroendocrine tumor. No significant difference was detected between mastectomy and breast preservation in locoregional recurrence (15% versus 13%), distant metastases (31% versus 22%), or 5-year survival (75% vs. 79%). Regardless of surgical therapy, the most important determinant of survival was the number of positive nodes. Five-year overall survival was 87% with 1–3 positive nodes compared with 42% with >=4 positive nodes (P < .0001).

Conclusions: Occult primary carcinoma with axillary metastases can be treated with preservation of the breast without a negative impact on local control or survival.

Key Words: Breast neoplasm • Occult primary • Axillary metastasis • Breast preservation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl
Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part 2. Clinical Applications
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 672 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. L. Buchanan, E. A. Morris, P. L. Dorn, P. I. Borgen, and K. J. Van Zee
Utility of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Occult Primary Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2005; 12(12): 1045 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.