Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nos, C.
Right arrow Articles by Clough, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nos, C.
Right arrow Articles by Clough, K. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sentinel lymph node
Annals of Surgical Oncology 8:438-443 (2001)
© 2001 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Sentinel Lymph Node Detection for Breast Cancer: Which Patients Are Best Suited for the Patent Blue Dye Only Method of Identification?

Claude Nos, MD, Paul Fréneaux, MD, Sandrine Guilbert, MD, Marie C. Falcou, DM, Remi J. Salmon, MD and Krishna B. Clough, MD

From the Departments of Surgery (CN, SG, RJS, KBC), Pathology (PF), and Biostatistics (MCF), Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr Claude Nos, Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; Fax: 33-144324006.

Background: The objectives of this study were, first, to define the preoperative criteria for using solely the blue dye method and, second, to decrease its operator dependence in predicting axillary lymph node status.

Methods: Two hundred fifty-three women consecutively identified with operable breast cancer underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection by the patent blue dye method followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection. A standard pathological examination was performed for all SLN. Then, a pathological color quality assessment (PCQA), which checked for the presence of the blue dye, was performed on the paraffin blocks of the nonmetastatic SLN. Six preoperative identifiable variables likely to influence the detection rate were examined.

Results: The surgical detection (sd) rate was 84% (213 of 253) and the PCQA rate was 73% (185 of 253). Only breast size (sd, P = .0005; PCQA, P = .0007) and body mass index <=30 (sd, P = .005; PCQA, P = .0007) were significant for SLN identification. Multivariate analysis revealed two independent factors influencing SLN identification: breast size (sd, P = .0001; PCQA, P = .002) and the timing of injection—injection prior to lumpectomy (sd, P =.04).

Conclusions: The optimal patient features for identifying the SLN by the patent blue dye method are small or medium-sized breasts, low body fat, and that the procedure is carried out prior to tumor excision. The PCQA offers a useful second assessment of the surgically removed SLN, introducing an independent element of quality control.

Key Words: Sentinel lymph node biopsy • Breast carcinoma • Axillary dissection • Pathological color quality assessment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. P.-C. Tan
Breast Lymphatic Anatomy and Implications for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2008; 15(8): 2345 - 2346.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. Nakahara, Y. Kitagawa, H. Yakeuchi, H. Fujii, T. Suzuki, M. Mukai, M. Kitajima, and A. Kubo
Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy for Detection of Sentinel Lymph Node in Patients with Gastric Cancer--Initial Experience
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 15(5): 1447 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. Alran, Y. De Rycke, V. Fourchotte, H. Charitansky, F. Laki, M. C. Falcou, M. Benamor, P. Freneaux, R. J. Salmon, for the Institut Curie Breast Cancer Study Group, et al.
Validation and Limitations of Use of a Breast Cancer Nomogram Predicting the Likelihood of Non Sentinel Node Involvement After Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 14(8): 2195 - 2201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Lerman, G. Lievshitz, O. Zak, U. Metser, S. Schneebaum, and E. Even-Sapir
Improved Sentinel Node Identification by SPECT/CT in Overweight Patients with Breast Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 201 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Louis-Sylvestre, K. Clough, B. Asselain, J. R. Vilcoq, R. J. Salmon, F. Campana, and A. Fourquet
Axillary Treatment in Conservative Management of Operable Breast Cancer: Dissection or Radiotherapy? Results of a Randomized Study With 15 Years of Follow-Up
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2004; 22(1): 97 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. Nos, P. Freneaux, C. Louis-Sylvestre, J. S. Hurren, D. Heitz, X. Sastre-Garau, and K. B. Clough
Macroscopic Quality Control Improves the Reliability of Blue Dye-Only Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2003; 10(5): 525 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. A. Litvak and A. E. Giuliano
The Results of the Department of Defense's Breast Lymphatic Mapping Study
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2002; 9(5): 428 - 429.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.