Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janni, W.
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janni, W.
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Annals of Surgical Oncology 8:542-548 (2001)
© 2001 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Quality of Life Influenced by Primary Surgical Treatment for Stage I-III Breast Cancer—Long-Term Follow-Up of a Matched-Pair Analysis

W. Janni, MD, D. Rjosk, MD, Th. Dimpfl, MD, K. Haertl, PhD, B. Strobl, MD, F. Hepp, MD, A. Hanke, F. Bergauer, MD and H. Sommer, MD, PhD

From the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women’s Clinic at Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Wolfgang Janni, MD, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Maistrasse 11, 80337 Munich, Germany; Fax: 49-821-2090260; E-mail: janni{at}fk-i.med.uni-muenchen.de

Background: Breast-conserving therapy has been demonstrated to be just as safe and a less disruptive experience compared with mastectomy for surgically manageable breast cancer. There is, however, no agreement in the literature about the impact of these procedures on several important aspects of quality of life (QOL). The purpose of the present study is to compare the long-term impact of these two surgical approaches on QOL in patients with identical tumor stages and to suggest possible shortcomings of the standard QOL questionnaires.

Method: Between August 1999 and May 2000, QOL questionnaires were answered by 152 pair-matched patients at the I. Frauenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, as part of routine follow-up examinations. The pairs of patients, each consisting of one patient after mastectomy and one after breast conservation, were selected according to the highest degree of equivalence in tumor stage. All patients had been initially treated for stage I-III breast cancer without evidence of distant metastases. The QOL was evaluated by using the QLQ-C30 questionnaire version 2.0 of the EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. We formulated seven additional questions about the patients’ satisfaction with the primary surgical treatment modality as viewed from their current perspective. The QOL questionnaires were answered after a median interval of 46 months following primary treatment.

Results: Tumor stage, prognostic factors, and adjuvant systemic treatment were well balanced between the two groups. No differences between the two groups were observed in terms of all QOL items measured by the QLQ-C30. Our additional questions, however, revealed that patients in the mastectomy group were less satisfied with the cosmetic result of their primary operation (P < .0001), were more likely to feel basic changes in their appearance (P < .0001), and were more likely to be emotionally stressed by these facts (P < .0001). From their perspective at the time of completing the questionnaires, 11 patients in the mastectomy group (15%) would decide differently about the surgical treatment modality, compared with only 3 patients (4%) in the breast conservation group (P = .025).

Conclusion: While the primary surgical treatment modality seems to have no long-term impact on general QOL, certain body-image-related problems may be caused by mastectomy. Standard measuring instruments for QOL may fail to detect differences in satisfaction and adaptation with the primary surgical treatment modality.

Key Words: Breast neoplasm • Quality of life (QOL) • Mastectomy • Breast conservation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
P. A. Parker, A. Youssef, S. Walker, K. Basen-Engquist, L. Cohen, E. R. Gritz, Q. X. Wei, and G. L. Robb
Short-Term and Long-Term Psychosocial Adjustment and Quality of Life in Women Undergoing Different Surgical Procedures for Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 14(11): 3078 - 3089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. J. Katz and S. T. Hawley
From Policy To Patients And Back: Surgical Treatment Decision Making For Patients With Breast Cancer
Health Aff., May 1, 2007; 26(3): 761 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M. Pandey, B. C. Thomas, K. Ramdas, and K. Ratheesan
Early effect of surgery on quality of life in women with operable breast cancer.
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 36(7): 468 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
K. Hartl, W. Janni, R. Kastner, H. Sommer, B. Strobl, B. Rack, and M. Stauber
Impact of medical and demographic factors on long-term quality of life and body image of breast cancer patients
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2003; 14(7): 1064 - 1071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study-Quality of
Development and Validation of Disease-Specific Measures for Choroidal Melanoma: COMS-QOLS Report No. 2
Arch Ophthalmol, July 1, 2003; 121(7): 1010 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.