Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, M. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Annals of Surgical Oncology 8:586-591 (2001)
© 2001 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

An Outcome Study of Breast Reconstruction: Presurgical Identification of Risk Factors for Complications

Kant Y. Lin, MD, Francis R. Johns, DMD, MD, Jennifer Gibson, MS, Millie Long, BA, David B. Drake, MD and Marcia M. Moore, MD

From the Departments of Plastic Surgery (KYL, FRJ, ML, DBD), Health Evaluation Sciences (JG), and Surgery (MMM), University of Virginia Health Sciences System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kant Y. Lin, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Box 800376, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Fax: 804-924-1333; E-mail: kyl5s@ virginia.edu.

Background: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy has been shown to have a salutary effect on the overall psychological well-being of women being treated for breast cancer. Unfortunately, however, not every patient is an ideal candidate for reconstruction. Complications stemming from reconstructive surgery can cause significant morbidity, the most important of which may be the delay of subsequent adjuvant antineoplastic therapies, and therefore may not be in the best interests of the patient.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed on a consecutive series of 123 breast reconstructions in 98 patients, performed by one of two plastic surgeons, in a university setting over a 5-year period, for all surgical outcomes. Specifically, wound-healing complications, infections, and reoperations leading to the potential delay of subsequent chemotherapy or radiotherapy were recorded, and possible risk factors leading to these were sought.

Results: Three presurgical risk factors were found to have a statistically significant influence on the development of complications following breast reconstruction. These were: (1) increasing obesity, defined by the body mass index, (2) an active or recent (<5 year) history of cigarette smoking, and (3) a history of previous radiation exposure. Odds ratios were used to describe the magnitude of the effect of each factor for the development of complications. An ordinal regression analysis was used to create a nomogram based on this information that can be used to calculate any individual patient’s presurgical risk for developing major complications following breast reconstruction, based on the presence of these factors.

Conclusions: It is possible, based on the presence of specific presurgical risk factors, to predict the probability of developing major complications following breast reconstruction. This information can be useful to the referring physician and plastic surgeon alike in determining which patients are the best candidates for breast reconstruction and which type of reconstruction would be best suited for each individual patient.

Key Words: Breast reconstruction • Risk factors • Obesity • Cigarette smoking • Radiotherapy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. M. Lagarde, J. B. Reitsma, A.-K. D. Maris, M. I. van Berge Henegouwen, O. R.C. Busch, H. Obertop, A. H. Zwinderman, and J. J. B. van Lanschot
Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 1938 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
B. A. M. Heemskerk-Gerritsen, C. T. M. Brekelmans, M. B. E. Menke-Pluymers, A. N. van Geel, M. M. A. Tilanus-Linthorst, C. C. M. Bartels, M. Tan, H. E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, J. G. M. Klijn, and C. Seynaeve
Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers and Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Long-Term Experiences at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 14(12): 3335 - 3344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
M. M. Mortenson, P. D. Schneider, V. P. Khatri, T. R. Stevenson, T. P. Whetzel, E. J. Sommerhaug, J. E. Goodnight Jr, and R. J. Bold
Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Increases Wound Complications: However, Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Is Not Delayed
Arch Surg, September 1, 2004; 139(9): 988 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. N. van Geel, C. M. E. Contant, R. T. J. Wai, P. I. M. Schmitz, A. M. M. Eggermont, and M. M. E. Menke-Pluijmers
Mastectomy by Inverted Drip Incision and Immediate Reconstruction: Data From 510 Cases
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2003; 10(4): 389 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.