Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. C.G.
Right arrow Articles by Cody III, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. C.G.
Right arrow Articles by Cody III, H. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sentinel lymph node
Annals of Surgical Oncology 8:592-597 (2001)
© 2001 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Highest Isotope Count Does Not Predict Sentinel Node Positivity in All Breast Cancer Patients

Robert C.G. Martin, MD, Jane Fey, MPH, Henry Yeung, MD, Patrick I. Borgen, MD and Hiram S. Cody III, MD

From The Breast Service, Department of Surgery (RCGM, JF, PIB, HSC) and the Department of Nuclear Medicine (HY), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Hiram S. Cody III, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021; Fax: 212-794-5812; E-mail: codyh{at}mskcc.org

Background: Radioisotope mapping is an essential technical component of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, and most authors define isotope success by an arbitrary threshold SLN-to-background ratio. Few studies have examined the degree to which the relative level of SLN counts correlates with the presence of metastasis. Having removed the SLN with the highest counts, how far should the surgeon persist in removing additional SLN which contain much lower levels of isotope?

Methods: We performed SLN biopsy, using both radioisotope and blue dye, in 2285 consecutive patients with stage I-II breast cancer. Successful isotope localization was defined as an ex vivo SLN-to-axillary background count ratio of at least 4:1, and enhanced pathologic analysis (serial sections and immunohistochemistry) was used throughout.

Results: Among the 1566 patients with more than one SLN site identified, the SLN contained metastasis in 463 (30%). In 369 (80%) of these SLN-positive cases, the SLN with the highest count contained tumor, but in 94 (20%) it was benign. Among these 94: (1) the counts of the hottest benign SLN exceeded those of the histologically positive SLN by a ratio of at least 10:1 in 31% (29 of 94) of cases, (2) the counts of the positive SLN were < 4:1 those of the axillary background in 16% (15 of 94) of cases, and (3) blue dye failed to identify 27% of positive SLN. No optimum ratio of SLN-to-SLN or SLN-to-background counts identified the positive SLN in all cases.

Conclusion: Although the SLN with the highest counts is positive in 80% of breast cancer patients with multiple SLN, neither a relatively high isotope count nor the presence of blue dye consistently predict SLN positivity in all breast cancer patients. For maximum accuracy, SLN biopsy requires (1) the removal of all nodes containing isotope regardless of the relative magnitude of counts, (2) the concurrent use of blue dye to salvage those procedures in which isotope fails, and (3) the removal of all clinically suspicious non-SLN.

Key Words: Sentinel node biopsy • Breast cancer • Lymph node metastasis • Lymphoscintigraphy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. C. van Rijk, E. E. Deurloo, O. E. Nieweg, K. G. A. Gilhuijs, J. L. Peterse, E. J. T. Rutgers, R. Kroger, and B. B. R. Kroon
Ultrasonography and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Can Spare Breast Cancer Patients Unnecessary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 13(1): 31 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J.-M. Classe, M. Fiche, C. Rousseau, C. Sagan, F. Dravet, R. Pioud, A. Lisbona, L. Ferrer, L. Campion, I. Resche, et al.
Prospective Comparison of 3 {gamma}-Probes for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in 200 Breast Cancer Patients
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 395 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
O. E. Nieweg and S. H. Estourgie
What is a Sentinel Node and What is a False-Negative Sentinel Node?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 11(3_suppl): 169S - 173S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Suga, Y. Yuan, M. Okada, N. Matsunaga, A. Tangoku, S. Yamamoto, and M. Oka
Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping at CT Lymphography with Iopamidol: Preliminary Experience
Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 543 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. L. Quan, D. McCready, W. J. Temple, and J. G. McKinnon
Biology of Lymphatic Metastases in Breast Cancer: Lessons Learned From Sentinel Node Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2002; 9(5): 467 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. M. McMasters, S. L. Wong, and C. Chao
Comment on the article "Highest Isotope Count Does Not Predict Sentinel Node Positivity in All Breast Cancer Patients," by Martin et al., August 2001, Annals of Surgical Oncology
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2002; 9(3): 317 - 318.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.