| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Second Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kentaro Inoue, MD, Second Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, 10-15 Fumizonocho, Moriguchi, Osaka 570-8507, Japan; E-mail: inoueke{at}takii.kmu.ac.jp
Background: The need for a precise lymph node staging without stage migration is of paramount importance when comparing and evaluating international treatment results.
Methods: We reviewed 1019 patients who underwent R0 resection at Kansai Medical University between 1980 and 1997. The patients were classified according to the 1997 International Union Against Cancer (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN classification or the N staging depending on the ratio between the number of excised and the number of involved lymph nodes (pN1,
25%; pN2,
50%; pN3, >50%).
Results: Among the 1997 UICC/AJCC pN subgroups, prognosis worsened with an increase in lymph node ratio. In contrast, the ratio-based classification showed more homogenous survival according to the number of involved lymph nodes. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the ratio-based classification was the most significant prognostic factor, whereas the 1997 UICC/AJCC classification was not found to be an independent predictor of survival. In addition, the ratio-based classification showed a superiority to the 1997 UICC/AJCC classification with respect to stage migration.
Conclusions: Ratio-based lymph node staging is simple and gives more precise information for prognosis with fewer problems related to stage migration than the 1997 UICC/AJCC staging system.
Key Words: Gastric carcinoma Lymph node classification Lymph node metastasis Prognostic factor TNM classification Lymph node ratio
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Wang, J. M. Hassett, M. T. Dayton, and M. N. Kulaylat Lymph Node Ratio: Role in the Staging of Node-Positive Colon Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1600 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, J.-J. Wang, and F. Wan A Common Misuse of Stepwise Regression in Studies of Ratio of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Gastric Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1805 - 1806. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Slidell, D. C. Chang, J. L. Cameron, C. Wolfgang, J. M. Herman, R. D. Schulick, M. A. Choti, and T. M. Pawlik Impact of Total Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Ratio on Staging and Survival after Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Large, Population-Based Analysis Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 165 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Lee, H.-J. Choi, K.-J. Park, J.-S. Shin, H.-C. Kwon, M.-S. Roh, and C. Kim Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Node-Positive Colon Carcinoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 14(5): 1712 - 1717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Dhar, S. Hattori, Y. Tonomoto, T. Shimoda, H. Kato, M. Tachibana, K. Matsuura, Y. Mitsumoto, A. G. Little, and N. Nagasue Appraisal of a Revised Lymph Node Classification System for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1265 - 1272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pedrazzani, Prof. G. deManzoni, D. Marrelli, S. Giacopuzzi, G. Corso, M. Bernini, and Prof. F. Roviello Nodal Staging in Adenocarcinoma of the Gastro-Esophageal Junction. Proposal of a Specific Staging System Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 299 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. V. Costa, K. de Cassia Braga Ribeiro, M. A. C. Machado, A. C. L. V. Costa, and A. L. Montagnini Prognostic Score in Gastric Cancer: The Importance of a Conjoint Analysis of Clinical, Pathologic, and Therapeutic Factors Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 13(6): 843 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Cheong, W. J. Hyung, J. G. Shen, C. Song, J. Kim, S. H. Choi, and S. H. Noh The N Ratio Predicts Recurrence and Poor Prognosis in Patients With Node-Positive Early Gastric Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2006; 13(3): 377 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Berger, E. R. Sigurdson, T. LeVoyer, A. Hanlon, R. J. Mayer, J. S. Macdonald, P. J. Catalano, and D. G. Haller Colon Cancer Survival Is Associated With Decreasing Ratio of Metastatic to Examined Lymph Nodes J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2005; 23(34): 8706 - 8712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bouche, M. Ychou, P. Burtin, L. Bedenne, M. Ducreux, G. Lebreton, J. Baulieux, B. Nordlinger, C. Martin, J. F. Seitz, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with surgery alone for gastric cancer: 7-year results of the FFCD randomized phase III trial (8801) Ann. Onc., September 1, 2005; 16(9): 1488 - 1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. McKee and M. C. Posner The Staging of Gastric Cancer: Nothing Novel but Perhaps Better Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2003; 10(9): 1005 - 1006. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nitti, A. Marchet, M. Olivieri, A. Ambrosi, R. Mencarelli, C. Belluco, and M. Lise Ratio Between Metastatic and Examined Lymph Nodes Is an Independent Prognostic Factor After D2 Resection for Gastric Cancer: Analysis of a Large European Monoinstitutional Experience Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2003; 10(9): 1077 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. O. Douglass Gastric Cancer: D2 All Over Again Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2003; 10(3): 206 - 207. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |