| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Departments of Surgery/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (JMR, JDW, RA, SW, JJC), Pathology (DD), and Medicine/Biostatistics (JF), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jeffrey D. Wagner, MD, RT 471, Cancer Pavilion, 535 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN 46202; Fax: 317-278-3164; E-mail: jdwagner{at}iupui.edu
Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between nodal tumor burden and the outcomes of recurrence and survival in sentinel nodepositive melanoma patients.
Methods: We reviewed a series of sentinel nodepositive patients with primary cutaneous melanoma treated with completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Microscopic nodal tumor deposits were counted and measured with an ocular micrometer. Various measures of tumor burden and traditional melanoma prognostic indicators were studied in multivariate Cox regression models.
Results: Sentinel lymph node and CLND specimens were evaluated in 90 node-positive patients. The diameter of the largest lymph node tumor nodule and the total lymph node tumor volume were significant predictors of recurrence (two-sided P < .0001 for both) and survival (two-sided P = .0018 and P = .0002, respectively). A tumor deposit diameter of 3 mm was identified as the most significant cut point predictive of recurrence (P < .0001; hazard ratio, 5.18) and survival (P < .0001; hazard ratio, 5.43). The 3-year survival probability was .86 for patients with largest tumor deposit diameters of
3 mm and was .27 for patients with largest deposit diameters >3 mm (P < .0001).
Conclusions: Microstaging of melanoma sentinel lymph node/CLND specimens by using the diameter of the largest tumor deposit is a highly significant predictor of early relapse and survival.
Key Words: Melanoma Metastasis Nodal tumor burden Lymph nodes
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Gershenwald, R. H.I. Andtbacka, V. G. Prieto, M. M. Johnson, A. H. Diwan, J. E. Lee, P. F. Mansfield, J. N. Cormier, C. W. Schacherer, and M. I. Ross Microscopic Tumor Burden in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Predicts Synchronous Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Patients With Melanoma J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2008; 26(26): 4296 - 4303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Riber-Hansen, P. Sjoegren, S. J. Hamilton-Dutoit, and T. Steiniche Extensive Pathological Analysis of Selected Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Nodes: High Metastasis Detection Rates at Reduced Workload Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 15(5): 1492 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Rossi, G. L. De Salvo, E. Bonandini, S. Mocellin, M. Foletto, S. Pasquali, P. Pilati, M. Lise, D. Nitti, E. Rizzo, et al. Factors Predictive of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement and Clinical Outcome in Melanoma Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Node Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 1202 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Govindarajan, D. M. Ghazarian, D. R. McCready, and W. L. Leong Histological Features of Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases Associated with Status of the Completion Lymphadenectomy and Rate of Subsequent Relapse Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 906 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Scoggins, M. I. Ross, D. S. Reintgen, R. D. Noyes, J. S. Goydos, P. D. Beitsch, M. M. Urist, S. Ariyan, B. S. Davidson, J. J. Sussman, et al. Prospective Multi-Institutional Study of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Molecular Staging of Melanoma J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2849 - 2857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Ross Early-stage melanoma: staging criteria and prognostic modeling. Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 2312s - 2319s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Thomas Time to Re-Evaluate Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Post-Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9443 - 9444. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Cochran, A. Roberts, D.-R. Wen, R.-R. Huang, E. Itakura, F. Luo, and S. W. Binder Optimized Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Metastatic Melanoma: Implications for Regional Surgery and Overall Treatment Planning Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 11(3_suppl): 156S - 161S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C A Murray, W L Leong, D R McCready, and D M Ghazarian Histopathological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2004; 57(1): 64 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |