Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ranieri, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ranieri, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, J. J., III
Related Collections
Right arrow Sentinel lymph node
Annals of Surgical Oncology 9:975-981 (2002)
© 2002 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Prognostic Importance of Lymph Node Tumor Burden in Melanoma Patients Staged by Sentinel Node Biopsy

Jaime M. Ranieri, MD, Jeffrey D. Wagner, MD, Rafael Azuaje, MD, D. Davidson, MD, Stacie Wenck, RN, Joanne Fyffe, MS and John J. Coleman, III, MD

From the Departments of Surgery/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (JMR, JDW, RA, SW, JJC), Pathology (DD), and Medicine/Biostatistics (JF), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jeffrey D. Wagner, MD, RT 471, Cancer Pavilion, 535 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN 46202; Fax: 317-278-3164; E-mail: jdwagner{at}iupui.edu

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between nodal tumor burden and the outcomes of recurrence and survival in sentinel node–positive melanoma patients.

Methods: We reviewed a series of sentinel node–positive patients with primary cutaneous melanoma treated with completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Microscopic nodal tumor deposits were counted and measured with an ocular micrometer. Various measures of tumor burden and traditional melanoma prognostic indicators were studied in multivariate Cox regression models.

Results: Sentinel lymph node and CLND specimens were evaluated in 90 node-positive patients. The diameter of the largest lymph node tumor nodule and the total lymph node tumor volume were significant predictors of recurrence (two-sided P < .0001 for both) and survival (two-sided P = .0018 and P = .0002, respectively). A tumor deposit diameter of 3 mm was identified as the most significant cut point predictive of recurrence (P < .0001; hazard ratio, 5.18) and survival (P < .0001; hazard ratio, 5.43). The 3-year survival probability was .86 for patients with largest tumor deposit diameters of <=3 mm and was .27 for patients with largest deposit diameters >3 mm (P < .0001).

Conclusions: Microstaging of melanoma sentinel lymph node/CLND specimens by using the diameter of the largest tumor deposit is a highly significant predictor of early relapse and survival.

Key Words: Melanoma • Metastasis • Nodal tumor burden • Lymph nodes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. E. Gershenwald, R. H.I. Andtbacka, V. G. Prieto, M. M. Johnson, A. H. Diwan, J. E. Lee, P. F. Mansfield, J. N. Cormier, C. W. Schacherer, and M. I. Ross
Microscopic Tumor Burden in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Predicts Synchronous Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Patients With Melanoma
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2008; 26(26): 4296 - 4303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. Riber-Hansen, P. Sjoegren, S. J. Hamilton-Dutoit, and T. Steiniche
Extensive Pathological Analysis of Selected Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Nodes: High Metastasis Detection Rates at Reduced Workload
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 15(5): 1492 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. R. Rossi, G. L. De Salvo, E. Bonandini, S. Mocellin, M. Foletto, S. Pasquali, P. Pilati, M. Lise, D. Nitti, E. Rizzo, et al.
Factors Predictive of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement and Clinical Outcome in Melanoma Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Node
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 1202 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. Govindarajan, D. M. Ghazarian, D. R. McCready, and W. L. Leong
Histological Features of Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases Associated with Status of the Completion Lymphadenectomy and Rate of Subsequent Relapse
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 906 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. R. Scoggins, M. I. Ross, D. S. Reintgen, R. D. Noyes, J. S. Goydos, P. D. Beitsch, M. M. Urist, S. Ariyan, B. S. Davidson, J. J. Sussman, et al.
Prospective Multi-Institutional Study of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Molecular Staging of Melanoma
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2849 - 2857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. I. Ross
Early-stage melanoma: staging criteria and prognostic modeling.
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 2312s - 2319s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. M. Thomas
Time to Re-Evaluate Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Post-Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9443 - 9444.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. J. Cochran, A. Roberts, D.-R. Wen, R.-R. Huang, E. Itakura, F. Luo, and S. W. Binder
Optimized Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Metastatic Melanoma: Implications for Regional Surgery and Overall Treatment Planning
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 11(3_suppl): 156S - 161S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
C A Murray, W L Leong, D R McCready, and D M Ghazarian
Histopathological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes
J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2004; 57(1): 64 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.