Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rahusen, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Meijer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rahusen, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Meijer, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diagnosis
Right arrow Surgery
Annals of Surgical Oncology 9:994-998 (2002)
© 2002 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer Versus Wire-Guided Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Frans D. Rahusen, MD, Andre J. A. Bremers, MD, Hans F. J. Fabry, MD, A.H. M. Taets van Amerongen, MD, Rob P. A. Boom, MD and S. Meijer, MD, PhD

From the Department of Surgery (FDR), Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands; Departments of Surgical Oncology (AJAB, HFJF, SM) and Radiology (AHMTvA), Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Department of Surgery (RPAB), District General Hospital, Amstelveen, The Netherlands.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: S. Meijer, MD, PhD, VU Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam; Fax: 31-2-4444512; E-mail: s.meijer{at}vumc.nl

Background: The wire-guided excision of nonpalpable breast cancer often results in tumor resections with inadequate margins. This prospective, randomized trial was undertaken to investigate whether intraoperative ultrasound (US) guidance enables a better margin clearance than the wire-guided technique in the breast-conserving treatment of nonpalpable breast cancers.

Methods: Patients with a preoperative histological diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer that could be visualized both with US and mammography were included. Patients were randomized to undergo either a wire-guided or a US-guided excision. Adequate margins were defined as >=1 mm.

Results: Of 49 included patients, 23 were assigned to undergo wire-guided excision and 26 to undergo US-guided excision. One patient crossed over to US-guided excision after inadvertent wire displacement. Mean tumor diameter, specimen weight, and operating time were similar in both groups. The excision was adequate in 24 (89%) of 27 US-guided excisions and 12 (55%) of 22 wire-guide excisions (P = .007).

Conclusions: US-guided excision seems to be superior to wire-guided excision with respect to margin clearance of mammographically detected and US-visible nonpalpable breast cancers. Patients do not have to undergo the unpleasant wire placement before surgery.

Key Words: Nonpalpable • Mammography • Ultrasonography • Breast neoplasms • Segmental mastectomy • Needle biopsy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
L. E. McCahill, A. Privette, T. James, J. Sheehey-Jones, J. Ratliff, D. Majercik, D. N. Krag, M. Stanley, and S. Harlow
Quality Measures for Breast Cancer Surgery: Initial Validation of Feasibility and Assessment of Variation Among Surgeons
Arch Surg, May 1, 2009; 144(5): 455 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. Haid, M. Knauer, S. Dunzinger, Z. Jasarevic, R. Koberle-Wuhrer, A. Schuster, M. Toeppker, B. Haid, E. Wenzl, and F. Offner
Intra-operative Sonography: A Valuable Aid During Breast-Conserving Surgery for Occult Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 14(11): 3090 - 3101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. J. C. Cash, C. E. Coles, G. M. Treece, A. D. Purushotham, P. Britton, R. Sinnatamby, A. H. Gee, and R. W. Prager
Breast Cancers: Noninvasive Method of Preoperative Localization with Three-dimensional US and Surface Contour Mapping
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 556 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. Ngo, A. G. Pollet, J. Laperrelle, G. Ackerman, S. Gomme, F. Thibault, V. Fourchotte, and R. J. Salmon
Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast cancers.
Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 14(9): 2485 - 2489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. L. Rahman, S. Crawford, A. Larkin, and R. Quinlan
Superiority of Sonographic Hematoma Guided Resection of Mammogram Only Visible Breast Cancer: Wire Localization Should be an Exception Not the Rule
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 14(8): 2228 - 2232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. Layeequr Rahman, E. Iuanow, S. Crawford, and R. Quinlan
Sonographic Hematoma-Guided vs Wire-Localized Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Margins and Volume of Resection
Arch Surg, April 1, 2007; 142(4): 343 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
L. Tafra, S. J. Smith, J. E. Woodward, K. L. Fernandez, K. T. Sawyer, and R. T. Grenko
Pilot Trial of Cryoprobe-Assisted Breast-Conserving Surgery for Small Ultrasound-Visible Cancers
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2003; 10(9): 1018 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.