| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Fashion Footwear Association of New York/Virginia Clinton Kelley Research Fellowship (ATJ, LFS), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Cancer Research Center (ITR), Department of Veterans Affairs, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Department of Surgery (RSH-T, ATJ, ATM, LFS, KCW, VSK) and Department of Pathology (SK, NM, VSK), Little Rock, Arkansas.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ronda S. Henry-Tillman, MD, 4301 West Markham, Slot 725, Little Rock, AR 72205; Fax: 501-686-7861; E-mail: henryrondas{at}uams.edu
Background: The optimal technique for intraoperative pathologic examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is still controversial. Recent small series report sensitivity between 60% and 100% for various techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate our long-term experience with touch preparation cytology (TPC) and frozen section (FS) in the intraoperative examination of SLNs for breast cancer.
Methods: A total of 247 patients with operable breast cancer underwent an SLN biopsy for staging of the axilla. The SLN was identified by 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid unfiltered dye, blue dye, or both and dissected, and then intraoperative TPC or FS and permanent section, or both, were performed.
Results: A total of 479 SLNs were submitted for TPC and permanent hematoxylin and eosin. A total of 68 SLNs were positive by hematoxylin and eosin; 65 SLNs were positive by TPC, with a false-negative rate of 5.8%. The sensitivity for TPC was 94.2%, with a false-positive rate of 0.2%. A total of 165 SLNs were submitted for FS, with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 98.6%. The false-positive rate was 1.4%, with a false-negative rate of 15.8%.
Conclusions: In a large series, TPC is as accurate as FS but is simpler and faster in the detection of intraoperative metastasis in SLNs for breast cancer.
Key Words: Sentinel lymph node Breast cancer Touch preparation cytology Frozen section Accuracy
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Perhavec, N. Besic, M. Hocevar, and J. Zgajnar Touch Imprint Cytology of the Sentinel Lymph Nodes Might Not Be Indicated in Early Breast Cancer Patients with Ultrasonically Uninvolved Axillary Lymph Nodes Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2008; 15(8): 2257 - 2262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Vanderveen, R. Ramsamooj, and R. J. Bold A Prospective, Blinded Trial of Touch Prep Analysis versus Frozen Section for Intraoperative Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 15(7): 2006 - 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Valdes, S. K. Boolbol, I. Ali, S. M. Feldman, and J.-M. Cohen Intraoperative Touch Preparation Cytology for Margin Assessment in Breast-Conservation Surgery: Does It Work for Lobular Carcinoma? Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2007; 14(10): 2940 - 2945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Valdes, S. K. Boolbol, J.-M. Cohen, and S. M. Feldman Intra-operative Touch Preparation Cytology; Does It Have a Role in Re-excision Lumpectomy? Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 14(3): 1045 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Perez, S. Vidal-Sicart, G. Zanon, M. Velasco, G. Santamaria, A. Palacin, E. Campo, A. Cardesa, and P. L. Fernandez A Practical Approach to Intraoperative Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Carcinoma and Review of the Current Methods Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2005; 12(4): 313 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Brogi, E. Torres-Matundan, L. K. Tan, and H. S. Cody III The Results of Frozen Section, Touch Preparation, and Cytological Smear Are Comparable for Intraoperative Examination of Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Study in 133 Breast Cancer Patients Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 12(2): 173 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Fortunato, M. Amini, M. Farina, S. Rapacchietta, L. Costarelli, F. R. Piro, G. Alessi, P. Pompili, S. Bianca, and C. E. Vitelli Intraoperative Examination of Sentinel Nodes in Breast Cancer: Is the Glass Half Full or Half Empty? Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2004; 11(11): 1005 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Aihara, S. Munakata, H. Morino, and Y. Takatsuka Comparison of Frozen Section and Touch Imprint Cytology for Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2004; 11(8): 747 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Menes, P. I. Tartter, H. Mizrachi, S. R. Smith, and A. Estabrook Touch Preparation or Frozen Section for Intraoperative Detection of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases From Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2003; 10(10): 1166 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Bedrosian, D. Bedi, H. M. Kuerer, B. D. Fornage, L. Harker, M. I. Ross, F. C. Ames, S. Krishnamurthy, B. S. Edeiken-Monroe, F. Meric, et al. Impact of Clinicopathological Factors on Sensitivity of Axillary Ultrasonography in the Detection of Axillary Nodal Metastases in Patients With Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2003; 10(9): 1025 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. McCready Intraoperative Sentinel Node Assessment Is a Touchy Subject Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2002; 9(4): 321 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |