| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Department of Surgery (NK, KM, SM, HY, YK, KK), Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan; Department of Biochemistry (MF, YN), Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan; and Department of Biology (MS), Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, Japan.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kohji Miyazaki, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, Saga Medical School, Nabeshima 5-1-1, Saga, Japan 849-8501; Fax: 81-952-34-2019; E-mail: iyazak2@ post.saga-med.ac.jp.
Background: O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair enzyme that transfers methyl groups from O6-methylguanine to itself. Alkylation of DNA at the O6 position of guanine is an important step in the induction of mutations in the organism by alkylating agents. The O6-methyl G:T mismatch is recognized by the mismatch-repair (MMR) pathway. The biliary duct is highly exposed to alkylating agents because of its anatomical location.
Methods: We examined 39 surgically resected gallbladder carcinomas and 35 extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas and evaluated the expression of MGMT and MMR protein (hMLH1 and hMSH2) by immunohistochemical staining.
Results: MGMT-negative staining was detected in 59.0% of gallbladder carcinoma specimens and 60.0% of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma specimens. In gallbladder carcinoma, hMLH1- and hMSH2-negative staining was observed in 51.3% and 59.0%, respectively, whereas in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, the respective values were 57.1% and 65.7%. MGMT-negative staining correlated with hepatic invasion in gallbladder carcinoma and with poor prognosis in both types of tumor. Furthermore, a combined MGMT and MMR status was shown to be a more significant prognostic biomarker in both tumor types.
Conclusions: Combined MGMT and MMR is a possible prognostic marker that probably reflects an accumulation of genetic mutations.
Key Words: Biliary tract carcinoma MGMT hMLH1 hMSH2
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E R Nijhuis, H W Nijman, K A Oien, A Bell, K A ten Hoor, N Reesink-Peters, H M Boezen, H Hollema, and A G J van der Zee Loss of MSH2 protein expression is a risk factor in early stage cervical cancer J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2007; 60(7): 824 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brell, A. Tortosa, E. Verger, J. M. Gil, N. Vinolas, S. Villa, J. J. Acebes, L. Caral, T. Pujol, I. Ferrer, et al. Prognostic Significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Determined by Promoter Hypermethylation and Immunohistochemical Expression in Anaplastic Gliomas Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2005; 11(14): 5167 - 5174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Whang Epigenetics and Biliary Cancer: Promise and Pitfalls Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 12(5): 342 - 343. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Koga, Y. Kitajima, A. Miyoshi, K. Sato, K. Kitahara, H. Soejima, and K. Miyazaki Tumor Progression Through Epigenetic Gene Silencing of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase in Human Biliary Tract Cancers Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 12(5): 354 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Osanai, Y. Takagi, Y. Toriya, T. Nakagawa, T. Aruga, S. Iida, H. Uetake, and K. Sugihara Inverse Correlation Between the Expression of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyl Transferase (MGMT) and p53 in Breast Cancer Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2005; 35(3): 121 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Paz, R. Yaya-Tur, I. Rojas-Marcos, G. Reynes, M. Pollan, L. Aguirre-Cruz, J. L. Garcia-Lopez, J. Piquer, M.-J. Safont, C. Balana, et al. CpG Island Hypermethylation of the DNA Repair Enzyme Methyltransferase Predicts Response to Temozolomide in Primary Gliomas Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 10(15): 4933 - 4938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. House, I. I. Wistuba, P. Argani, M. Guo, R. D. Schulick, R. H. Hruban, J. G. Herman, and A. Maitra Progression of Gene Hypermethylation in Gallstone Disease Leading to Gallbladder Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 10(8): 882 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |