Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Do, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foster, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Do, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Annals of Surgical Oncology 9:462-466 (2002)
© 2002 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study for the Treatment of Advanced Stages of Breast Carcinoma

Robert D. Foster, MD, Laura J. Esserman, MD, James P. Anthony, MD, Eun-sil S. Hwang, MD and Hoang Do, MD

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (RDF, JPA, HD) and the Department of Surgery (LJE, ESH), the University of California, San Francisco, California.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Robert D. Foster, MD, University of California, San Francisco, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 350 Parnassus Ave., Suite 509, San Francisco, CA 94143-0932; Fax: 415-476-4001; E-mail: fosterr{at}surgery.ucsf.edu

Background: Recent published series demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate reconstruction for the treatment of early-stage breast carcinoma. Although several reports have retrospectively evaluated outcomes after breast reconstruction for locally advanced disease (stages IIB and III), no study has specifically considered immediate breast reconstruction after SSM for locally advanced disease.

Methods: From 1996 to 1998, 67 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma underwent SSM with immediate reconstruction and were prospectively observed. From this group of patients, those with locally advanced disease (stage IIB, n = 12; stage III, n = 13) were analyzed separately. Tumor characteristics, adjuvant therapy, type of reconstruction, operative time, complications, hospital stay, and incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis were noted.

Results: Breast reconstruction consisted of a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (n = 22) or a latissimus flap plus an implant (n = 4). The median operative time was 5.5 hours; the average hospital stay was 5.2 days. Complications required reoperation in three patients (12%): partial skin flap necrosis in two and partial abdominal skin necrosis in one. Surgery on the opposite breast for symmetry was required in one patient (4%). Postoperative adjuvant therapy was not significantly delayed (median interval, 32 days). With a median length of follow-up of 49.2 months (range, 33–64 months), local recurrence was present in only one patient (4%), with successful local salvage treatment, and distant metastasis was present in four patients (16%).

Conclusions: SSM with immediate reconstruction seems safe and effective and has a low morbidity for patients with advanced stages of breast carcinoma. Local recurrence rates and the incidence of distant metastasis are not increased compared with those of patients who have had modified radical mastectomies without reconstruction.

Key Words: Skin-sparing mastectomy • Breast reconstruction • Advanced breast cancer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. D. Rosson, N. K. Singh, N. Ahuja, L. K. Jacobs, and D. C. Chang
Multilevel Analysis of the Impact of Community vs Patient Factors on Access to Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy in Maryland
Arch Surg, November 1, 2008; 143(11): 1076 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. J. Stolier and J. Wang
Terminal Duct Lobular Units are Scarce in the Nipple: Implications for Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Terminal Duct Lobular Units in the Nipple
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 438 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
A. Wijayanayagam, A. S. Kumar, R. D. Foster, and L. J. Esserman
Optimizing the Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
Arch Surg, January 1, 2008; 143(1): 38 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. Jeziorski, J. Piekarski, D. Nejc, P. Pluta, P. Sek, A. Bilski, A. Durczynski, and K. Wronski
Ex vivo Search for Sentinel Node in Postmastectomy Specimens: Should We Use a Transverse Incision for Mastectomy?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 14(11): 3111 - 3116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. D. Foster, S. L. Hansen, L. J. Esserman, E. S. Hwang, C. Ewing, K. Lane, and J. P. Anthony
Safety of Immediate Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Breast Reconstruction for Patients With Locally Advanced Disease
Arch Surg, February 1, 2005; 140(2): 196 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. A. Buchholz, S. J. Kronowitz, and H. M. Kuerer
Immediate Breast Reconstruction after Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Radiation Oncology Considerations
Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2002; 9(8): 820 - 821.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.