This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kotwall, C. A. Articles by Covington, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kotwall, C. A. Articles by Covington, D. L. Related Collections Surgery

National Estimates of Mortality Rates for Radical Pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 Patients

From the Coastal Area Health Education Center (CAK, JGM, CCB, DLC), New Hanover Health Network (CAK, JGM), Wilmington, North Carolina; and the University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill (CAK, JGM, CGK, DLC), Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: C. A. Kotwall, MD, Coastal AHEC, PO Box 9025, Wilmington, NC 28402-9025; Fax: 910-763-4630; E-mail: canuck{at}med.unc.edu

Background: Recent publications suggest an inverse relationship between mortality rates in the Whipple procedure for periampullary cancer and hospital volume/teaching status.

Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 1988 to 1995, containing 24,926 patients undergoing pancreatectomy for periampullary cancer, was used.

Results: The mean number of procedures per hospital per year was 1.5, and the overall mortality was 14%. The volume of procedures per year increased from the rural to the urban nonteaching hospitals to the urban teaching hospitals (.6, 1.1, and 2.7, respectively), with a steady decrease in mortality among the three hospital types (18%, 15%, and 11%). A multiple logistic regression model with mortality odds ratios (ORs) showed that male sex (OR, 1.3), increasing age (OR, 1.6 to 6.7 in decades from 50 to 80 vs. <50 years), emergency admission (OR, 1.5), and hospital volume (less than one vs. one or more cases per year; OR, 1.5) were significantly predictive for increased in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions: In-hospital mortality in the low-volume hospital setting is prohibitive, and review of each institution’s mortality rates must occur before these procedures are performed in those institutions. In addition, patients over the age of 60 years, male patients, and those with an urgent admission are at a significant risk of in-hospital death, and consideration should be given toward transfer to an experienced institution.

Key Words: Mortality rate • Whipple procedure • Pancreaticoduodenectomy • Hospital volume

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. Vollmer Jr, W. Pratt, T. Vanounou, S. K. Maithel, and M. P. Callery Quality Assessment in High-Acuity Surgery: Volume and Mortality Are Not Enough Arch Surg, April 1, 2007; 142(4): 371 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Smith, J. T. McPhee, J. S. Hill, G. F. Whalen, M. E. Sullivan, D. E. Litwin, F. A. Anderson, and J. F. Tseng National Outcomes After Gastric Resection for Neoplasm Arch Surg, April 1, 2007; 142(4): 387 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Birkmeyer Raising the Bar for Pancreaticoduodenectomy Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2002; 9(9): 826 - 827. [Full Text] [PDF]