Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shabahang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Livingstone, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shabahang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Livingstone, A. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Annals of Surgical Oncology 9:881-886 (2002)
© 2002 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Comparison of Hepatic Resection and Hepatic Transplantation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Cirrhotic Patients

Mohsen Shabahang, MD, PhD, Dido Franceschi, MD, Noriyo Yamashiki, MD, Raj Reddy, MD, Peter A. Pappas, MD, Kuky Aviles, MD, Sonia Flores, MD, Andrea Chaparro, MD, Joseph U. Levi, MD, Danny Sleeman, MD, Andreas G. Tzakis, MD, Tomoaki Kato, MD, David M. Levi, MD and Alan S. Livingstone, MD

From the Divisions of Surgical Oncology (Department of Surgery) (MS, DF, PAP, KA, SF, AC, JUL, DS, ASL), Transplantation (Department of Surgery) (AGT, TK, DML), and Gastroenterology (Department of Medicine) (NY, RR), University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Mohsen Shabahang, MD, PhD, Division of General Surgery, Scott & White Clinic, 2401 S. 31st St., Temple, TX 76508; Fax: 254-724-8587; E-mail: mshabahang{at}swmail.sw.org

Background: The benefits of hepatic transplantation (HT) compared with hepatic resection (HR) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis are controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the results of these therapeutic options.

Methods: The charts of all patients with cirrhosis who underwent HR or HT for HCC between 1997 and 2000 were analyzed.

Results: The cohort included 44 patients who underwent HR compared with 65 with HT. All patients in the HR group had Child’s A disease, in contrast to the HT group, which included 23% Child’s A and 77% Child’s B and C patients. Whereas all HT patients spent at least three nights in the intensive care unit, 41% of the HR group never required critical care. Perioperative mortality was 7% in both groups. Pathologic analysis revealed T1/T2 disease in 43% of the HR group compared with 75% of the HT group. After 36 months of follow-up, there was no significant difference in overall survival (57% vs. 66%) or disease-free survival (36% vs. 66%) between the two groups.

Conclusions: With overall survival and disease-free survival as the main outcomes, the results of HR versus HT are comparable in Child’s A patients with HCC. In this patient subset, HR not only is an effective form of therapy, but is also associated with quicker recovery.

Key Words: Hepatocellular carcinoma • Hepatic resection • Hepatic transplantation • Cirrhotics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. T. P. Poon
Optimal Initial Treatment for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Preserved Liver Function: Transplantation or Resection?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 541 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
J Neuberger
Developments in liver transplantation
Gut, May 1, 2004; 53(5): 759 - 768.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.