Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roviello, F.
Right arrow Articles by Kurihara, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roviello, F.
Right arrow Articles by Kurihara, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Prognostic factors
Right arrow Surgery
Annals of Surgical Oncology 9:894-900 (2002)
© 2002 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Survival Benefit of Extended D2 Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer With Involvement of Second Level Lymph Nodes: A Longitudinal Multicenter Study

Franco Roviello, MD, Daniele Marrelli, MD, Paolo Morgagni, MD, Giovanni de Manzoni, MD, Alberto Di Leo, MD, Carla Vindigni, MD, Luca Saragoni, MD, Anna Tomezzoli, MD and Hayato Kurihara, MD for the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer

From the Unit of Surgical Oncology (FR, DM) and the Institute of Pathology (CV, AT), University of Siena, Italy; First Department of Surgery (PM), "Morgagni" Hospital of Forlì, Italy; First Division of General Surgery (GM, ADL), University of Verona, Italy; Unit of Pathology (LS), "Pierantoni" Hospital of Forlì, Italy; and Department of Surgery (HK), "Sacco" Hospital, University of Milano, Italy.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Franco Roviello, MD, Via De Gasperi 5, Siena, Italy 53100; Fax: 39-0577-233365; E-mail: Roviello{at}unisi.it

Background: The survival benefit of extended lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer is still being debated. The aim of this longitudinal multicenter study was to evaluate long-term survival in a group of patients with involvement of second level lymph nodes, which would not have been removed in the case of a limited lymphadenectomy. Results were compared with those in patients with involvement of first level lymph nodes.

Methods: Between 1991 and 1997, 451 patients with primary gastric cancer underwent curative resection with extended lymphadenectomy at three surgical departments in Italy according to the rules of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer.

Results: In 451 cases treated by extended lymphadenectomy, morbidity and mortality rates were 17.1% and 2%, respectively. In 126 patients (27.9%) (group A), metastases were found in lymph node stations 7 to 12; 109 patients (24.2%) had metastases confined to the first level (group B). Lymph node stations 7 and 8 showed the highest incidence of metastases in the second level (17.1% and 12.4%, respectively). A significant difference in 5-year survival was observed between group A and group B (32% vs. 54%; P = .0005). This difference disappeared when cases were stratified according to the number of positive lymph nodes. By multivariate analysis, only the number of positive lymph nodes (relative risk, 1.8; P < .0001) and the depth of invasion (relative risk, 2.1; P < .0001), but not the level of involved nodes, showed to be independent predictors of poor prognosis.

Conclusions: Japanese-type extended lymphadenectomy yields low morbidity and mortality rates if performed in specialized centers. This procedure could provide a good probability of long-term survival, even for patients with involvement of regional lymph nodes.

Key Words: Gastric cancer • Surgery • Lymphadenectomy • Lymph node metastasis • Prognostic factors • Follow-up




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. Pedrazzani, G. de Manzoni, D. Marrelli, S. Giacopuzzi, G. Corso, A. M. Minicozzi, B. Rampone, and F. Roviello
Lymph node involvement in advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 378 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. P. Barbour, N. P. Rizk, M. Gonen, L. Tang, M. S. Bains, V. W. Rusch, D. G. Coit, and M. F. Brennan
Lymphadenectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ): Impact of Adequate Staging on Outcome
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 306 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. Marrelli, C. Pedrazzani, A. Neri, G. Corso, A. DeStefano, E. Pinto, and F. Roviello
Complications after Extended (D2) and Superextended (D3) Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: Analysis of Potential Risk Factors
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 25 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. M. Kappas, M. Fatouros, and D. H. Roukos
Editorial: Is it Time to Change Surgical Strategy for Gastric Cancer in the United States?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2004; 11(8): 727 - 730.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
B.J. Dicken, L.D. Saunders, G.S. Jhangri, C. de Gara, C. Cass, S. Andrews, and S.M. Hamilton
Gastric Cancer: Establishing Predictors of Biologic Behavior with Use of Population-Based Data
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2004; 11(6): 629 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.