| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
LETTER TO THE EDITOR |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Largo R. Benzi 1, Genoa, Italy
To the Editor:
We read with interest the article titled "Prognostic Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor, and Angiogenin in Patients With Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgery".1 We would like to bring your attention to some methodological concerns that have arisen.
The authors measured serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels. The serum VEGF concentration changes depending on clotting duration.2,3 The interval between sample collection and processing is relevant; it should be standardized and declared. Hormbrey et al. proved that there is no significant difference in VEGF levels in serum samples processed between 30 and 60 minutes after collection, but the difference becomes significant when the samples are processed after 26 hours.3 In a clinical situation, where blood samples are taken and left for variable times before processing, the contribution from the clotting process may interfere with the measurement of circulating VEGF levels at the time of sampling. Moreover, even if a strict uniformity of clotting time could be applied to all samples, the interpersonal variation in generation of VEGF in clotted samples may make the interpretation of the measurement very difficult.
The authors reported a positive correlation between serum VEGF level and the platelet count. This confirms the results of previous studies suggesting that the serum measurement of VEGF reflects the clotting process rather than VEGF synthesis by peripheral tissues.2,4,5 Despite recent evidence supporting the use of serum VEGF level and an indirect estimate of tumor VEGF expression,6 we believe that it would be interesting to evaluate the prognostic value of plasma VEGF in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. In plasma, platelet degranulation is minimized by adding anticoagulants to the blood samples, and as a consequence, plasma VEGF concentrations are up to 20 times lower than the matched serum VEGF concentrations.5 When utilizing plasma for VEGF measurement, the interval between sample collection and processing is not as critical as in the case of serum, and the normalization of VEGF levels by platelet count is not necessary. In light of these considerations, we believe that the measurement of circulating plasma VEGF may improve the predictive value of the test.
REFERENCES
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |