| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
and Melphalan for Bulky In-Transit Melanoma Metastases
From the Clinica Chirurgica Generale II, Dipartimento di Scienze Oncologiche e Chirurgiche, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Carlo Riccardo Rossi, MD, Clinica Chirurgica Generale II, Dipartimento di Scienze Oncologiche e Chirurgiche, Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy; Fax: 39-049-651891; E-mail: carlor.rossi{at}unipd.it
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HILP in patients with bulky disease.
Methods: Twenty patients underwent TNF
(1 mg) and L-PAM (10 mg/L) HILP. Perfusion was performed for 90 minutes, and systemic leakage was strictly monitored. Locoregional toxicity was evaluated according to Wieberdinks criteria, whereas tumor response was evaluated with physical examination and ultrasound scan with or without fine-needle aspiration of any suspected recurrence.
Results: In all cases, systemic leakage was <5%. No postoperative deaths occurred, and locoregional toxicity was mild (grade 1 or 2) in 95% of patients. A complete tumor response was obtained in 14 patients (70%), and partial responses were obtained in 5 patients (25%). After a median follow-up of 18 months, six patients are alive and disease free, seven are alive with local or distant recurrence or both, and seven have died of disease.
Conclusions: Low-dose TNF
HILP can achieve tumor responses comparable with those reported with higher doses of cytokine. Moreover, this drug regimen is associated with acceptable local toxicity, carries a smaller risk of systemic toxicity, and incurs lower costs.
Key Words: Melanoma Isolated limb perfusion TNF
Melphalan
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When disease extent is a contraindication to surgical excision, hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) should be taken into consideration, because amputation does not provide any advantage in terms of disease-free survival and because the activity of systemic chemotherapy against local disease control is low.3 HILP is a well-established locoregional procedure that can deliver high-dose cytostatics to a limb with multiple in-transit melanoma lesions.4 This technique is quite sophisticated and requires accurate monitoring of systemic leakage and limb temperature to avoid major systemic and local side effects. Since its first clinical application, with a reported complete response (CR) rate of approximately 50%, melphalan (L-PAM) has been used as the referral drug.3,4 Other cytostatics, such as nitrogen mustards, dacarbazine, actinomycin D, and cisplatin, have shown no therapeutic advantage over L-PAM in terms of either response duration or response rates.3,4
Since the early 1990s, recombinant human tumor necrosis factor (TNF)
and L-PAM have been used for HILP, with impressive CR rates of up to 90% in several published series.3,4 However, TNF
administration has potentially lethal side effects if significant systemic leakage occurs during HILP. Particular care must therefore be taken to monitor drug leakage when HILP is performed.5 Despite the large body of reports on TNF
-based HILP for the treatment of melanoma metastases,4,6 it is not yet clear whether this regimen improves the tumor response rate, because no definitive data are available on a homogeneous population of melanoma patients. Two prospective randomized clinical trials have been undertaken in the United States and Europe that challenge L-PAM versus L-PAM plus TNF
. In the US trial, the regimen was also combined with interferon-gamma (IFN
). The European trial was terminated early because of slow recruitment, and no significant difference in tumor CR rate was found between the two study groups.7 The US study showed that the addition of TNF
and IFN
improved tumor response rates, especially in the subset of patients with bulky disease.8 However, because the cytokine was used at the dose of 3 to 4 mg, the optimal TNF
dose in HILP has not yet been clearly established.
Some investigators9 have suggested that low-dose (.51 mg) TNF
might be as active as higher doses. We performed a phase I and II study with L-PAM and escalating dosages of TNF
under hyperthermic conditions (40.5°C41.5°C) and found similar tumor response rates but fewer complications in patients treated with .5 to 1.6 mg of TNF
than in patients treated with higher dosages.10 We therefore started to routinely treat patients with recurrent or bulky in-transit melanoma metastases with 1 mg of TNF
plus L-PAM HILP. In this article, we report on and discuss the results of our clinical series.
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Perfusion Technique and Postoperative Care
HILP was performed under general anesthesia according to a well-established technique.1113 Briefly, the main limb vessels were exposed at the root of the limb, dissected free, and encircled with tourniquets. Major tributaries were dissected to identify potential sites of leakage from the perfusion circuit. Moreover, a tourniquet was secured at the root of the limb. Indwelling temperature probes were inserted throughout the limb and connected to a recorder. To monitor the leakage from the perfusion circuit to the systemic circulation, a gamma counter was connected to a rate meter and strip chart recorder and positioned over the heart. After systemic heparinization (200 UI/kg), the main vessels were cannulated and connected to the perfusion circuit, which was already primed with Ringers lactate. Arterial flow rates were set at 40 to 80 mL/min per kilogram of limb weight. Perfusate was oxygenated and heated to 42°C in a water bath (arterial line PO2 was >500 mm Hg). A period of 10 to 20 minutes was required for a muscle temperature of 39°C to 40°C (plateau phase) to be reached. Leakage monitoring was performed according to the technique described by Casara et al.14 by using 99mTc-albumin in the perfusion circuit. If no significant leakage was recorded, 1 mg of TNF was bolus-injected into the circuit. After 30 minutes, L-PAM was bolus-injected, and perfusion was continued for 1 hr. Temperatures were continuously monitored and adjusted to prevent the muscle temperature from increasing to >41.5°C.
At the end of perfusion, the circuit was washed out with .9% saline solution and refilled with Normosol-R solution (Fresenius-Kabi, Isola Della Scala, Italy). Cannulae were then removed, and the breaches on the vessels were repaired. Systemic protamine was given to reverse heparinization.
To minimize the risk of acute renal failure due to myoglobin precipitation, 18% mannitol solution, together with generous intravenous fluid support and urine alkalinization, was given during perfusion and the early postoperative course until myoglobin plasma levels returned to normal. Locoregional toxicity was graded according to the scale of Wieberdink et al. (Table 1),15 and systemic toxicity was classified according to the World Health Organization system.
|
Tumor Response and Clinical Outcome Evaluation
The evaluation of tumor response was mainly clinical; the number of tumors and their greatest diameter were measured.16 Soft tissue ultrasound scan with or without fine-needle aspiration was used to assess deep nodules suspected at physical examination; if nodules were too numerous, photographs of the affected limb were taken.
Tumor response was evaluated 3 months after HILP and was classified as follows: CR, disappearance of all clinical evidence of active tumor for a minimum of 4 weeks; partial response (PR), decrease of 50% or more in the sum of the product of the diameters of measured lesions for at least 1 month without any simultaneous increase in size or the appearance of any new lesions; no change, decrease in tumor size <50% or increase of tumor size <25%; and progressive disease, increase of >25% in the size of any measured lesion, appearance of a new tumor, or both. The clinical outcome of patients was assessed by analyzing local progression-free and overall survival, which was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and 10 mg/L of L-PAM. Five patients were also treated with inguinoiliac lymphadenectomy for synchronous lymph node metastases. Eight (40%) of the 20 patients had already undergone L-PAM HILP and were then submitted to low-dose TNF
-based redo HILP for recurrence; the median interval between the 2 procedures was 12 months (range, 648 months). Regarding HILP parameters, mean systemic leakage was .9% (range, 0%3.9%); mean muscle and tumor temperature was 41.2°C (range, 41°C41.5°C) and 41.4°C (range, 41.1°C41.7°C), respectively. Patients who had disease recurrence or progression underwent surgical excision of nodules (n = 2), radiotherapy (n = 3), or systemic bio/chemotherapy (n = 13).
Postoperative Morbidity
There were no postoperative deaths, nor were there cases of significant systemic toxicity. During the early postoperative course, all patients had augmented plasmatic myoglobin levels, but none developed acute postoperative renal failure. The mean time to normal myoglobin values was 3 days (range, 28 days).
No compartmental syndromes were reported. One patient had acute limb ischemia from damage of the intima during cannulation; this required early reoperation and a femorofemoral polytetrafluoroethylene graft repair. Thirteen (65%) patients had grade 1 locoregional toxicity, 6 (30%) had grade 2, and 1 (5%) had grade 3. No patient required amputation because of toxicity.
Tumor Response and Clinical Outcome
Complete and partial tumor responses were observed in 14 (70%) and 5 (25%) cases. The overall response (CR plus PR) rate was therefore 95%. The remaining patient showed a tumor response of <50% (no change).
Overall and local progressionfree survival curves are shown in Fig. 1. After a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 1063 months), six (30%) patients are alive and disease free, four (20%) are alive with local disease recurrence, three (15%) are alive with local disease and distant metastases, and seven have died of distant metastases after developing locoregional recurrence (Table 2). To date, among patients who had a CR (n = 14), eight (57%) have developed local recurrence, and four of the five patients who had a PR have local disease progression. The median time to local progression was 10 months (range, 663 months); considering patients with CR, the median local diseasefree time was 16 months (range, 823 months).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in HILP is considered an important breakthrough in the locoregional treatment of limb-confined solid tumors, and this cytokine has been approved by the European Drug Agency for the treatment of limb-threatening soft tissue sarcomas. Among the many uncontrolled trials in patients with melanoma that have been published, some report controversial results, mainly because of poor patient selection.4 Fraker et al.8 recently published the results of a randomized phase III study on 103 patients that showed an advantage in the arm treated with the association of L-PAM plus TNF
and IFN
in terms of CR rate, whereas no significant improvement was observed in the overall response rate, the local recurrence rate, or overall survival. A tendency toward better responses in patients with bulky disease has also been observed, although not all the patients enrolled in this study had bulky disease. In this trial, as in most of the published series, TNF
was used at full dosage (4 and 3 mg for upper and lower limb, respectively) in combination with subcutaneous IFN
.
In our series, the patient population was carefully selected in terms of tumor burden. Thus, we could analyze the activity of low-dose TNF
HILP in a quite homogeneous group of patients. The 70% CR rate reported by us is similar to that reported by Fraker et al., although we used much lower TNF
doses and hyperthermia. Furthermore, the median time to progression (10 months) in our series, which included only patients with bulky tumor, is comparable to that reported by other investigators who enrolled patients regardless of tumor burden.8,16 Finally, locoregional toxicity was quite limited: no patient required amputation or had permanent toxicity, and most patients (95%) had mild (grade 1 or 2) locoregional toxicity. The high activity of this novel therapeutic regimen may depend on some pharmacological and biological factors. The high response rate observed in this series might be related to the fact that 1 mg of TNF
is sufficient to reach in vivo the saturation of TNF
receptors, a phenomenon already described in vitro.17 Furthermore, on performing a pharmacokinetic study with low-dose TNF
HILP for advanced limb sarcomas (unpublished data), we reported TNF
perfusate concentrations 20-fold greater than those considered cytotoxic in vitro.18 These levels remained steady during HILP, supporting the hypothesis that 1 mg of cytokine is enough to saturate the entire uptake capacity of the limb. However, it is well known that heat, cytostatics, and TNF
act synergistically and that TNF
itself increases L-PAM penetration into tumor.3,1921 Finally, because tumor vasculature is the main target of TNF
, bulky tumors may be more sensitive to drug regimens containing this cytokine because of their high density of neovascularization.
Although TNF
seems to play a key role in the management of patients with in-transit melanoma metastases, two major drawbacks must be kept in mind: high costs and potentially lethal systemic toxicity. Regarding costs, TNF
is available on the market at a price of
![]()
![]()
![]()
) contributes to cutting costs.
Regarding systemic toxicity, the mainstay is accurate leakage control and monitoring. Of course, the lower the TNF
dose, the lower the risk of severe toxicity.
Overall, these considerations support the use of TNF
at lower doses than those commonly used. However, a larger comparative study is warranted to confirm the good results we obtained in this subset of patients affected with locally advanced melanoma.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
-based isolated limb perfusion seems to be active in patients affected with bulky in-transit metastases from cutaneous melanoma. The tumor response rate and the local progressionfree interval are comparable with those observed with higher TNF
doses. Received for publication March 6, 2003. Accepted for publication September 9, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. R. Rossi, F. Russano, S. Mocellin, V. Chiarion-Sileni, M. Foletto, P. Pilati, L. G. Campana, A. Zanon, G. F. Picchi, M. Lise, et al. TNF-Based Isolated Limb Perfusion Followed by Consolidation Biotherapy with Systemic Low-dose Interferon Alpha 2b in Patients with In-transit Melanoma Metastases: A Pilot Trial Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 1218 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Lejeune and A. M.M. Eggermont Hyperthermic Isolated Limb Perfusion With Tumor Necrosis Factor Is a Useful Therapy for Advanced Melanoma of the Limbs J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1449 - 1450. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Hayes, S. J. Neuhaus, M. A. Clark, and J. M. Thomas Isolated Limb Perfusion With Melphalan and Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} for Advanced Melanoma and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 230 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Cornett, L. M. McCall, R. P. Petersen, M. I. Ross, H. A. Briele, R. D. Noyes, J. J. Sussman, W. G. Kraybill, J. M. Kane III, H. R. Alexander, et al. Randomized Multicenter Trial of Hyperthermic Isolated Limb Perfusion With Melphalan Alone Compared With Melphalan Plus Tumor Necrosis Factor: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0020 J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4196 - 4201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. van Horssen, T. L. M. ten Hagen, and A. M. M. Eggermont TNF-{alpha} in Cancer Treatment: Molecular Insights, Antitumor Effects, and Clinical Utility. Oncologist, April 1, 2006; 11(4): 397 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bonvalot, A. Laplanche, F. Lejeune, E. Stoeckle, C. Le Pechoux, D. Vanel, P. Terrier, J. Lumbroso, M. Ricard, G. Antoni, et al. Limb salvage with isolated perfusion for soft tissue sarcoma: could less TNF-{alpha} be better? Ann. Onc., July 1, 2005; 16(7): 1061 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mocellin, M. Provenzano, C. R. Rossi, P. Pilati, R. Scalerta, M. Lise, and D. Nitti Induction of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression by Melanoma Sensitizes Endothelial Cells to Tumor Necrosis Factor-Driven Cytotoxicity Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 6879 - 6886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. W. de Wilt and a. J. F. Thompson Is there a Role for Isolated Limb Perfusion With Tumor Necrosis Factor in Patients With Melanoma? Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2004; 11(2): 119 - 121. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |