Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Ann Surg Oncol Early Release 10.1245/ASO.2004.03.914 on April 12, 2004

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11:458-459 (2004)
© 2004 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilchik, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilchik, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, S. R.

EDITORIALS

Editorial

Novel Effective Drugs and Evolving Ablation Technology: A More Comprehensive Approach to Hepatic Malignancies

Anton J. Bilchik, MD, PhD, FACS and Steve R. Martinez, MD

From the Division of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, California.

Correspondence: Address correspondence to: Anton J. Bilchik, MD, PhD, FACS, John Wayne Cancer Institute, 2200 Santa Monica Boulevard, Santa Monica, CA 90404; Fax: 310-449-5261; E-mail: bilchika{at}jwci.org

Hepatic metastases often present a therapeutic dilemma for the oncologist because of their significant morbidity and mortality. Most patients are treated with chemotherapy, frequently with disappointing results. Complete surgical resection is the only proven curative option, but most hepatic malignancies are considered unresectable because of unfavorable tumor location, decreased functional hepatic reserve, or poor patient performance.1 Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was developed to eradicate tumors in unresectable locations and preserve uninvolved hepatic parenchyma in patients with diminished hepatic reserve. The versatility and low cost of RFA have generated considerable enthusiasm among surgeons and interventional radiologists. Surgeons can perform RFA in the operating room via laparotomy or laparoscopy; interventional radiologists can perform RFA in the radiology suite via a percutaneous approach guided by ultrasonography or computed tomography.2,3

Despite many retrospective studies that report low recurrence rates and safety of RFA,4,5 there is a paucity of long-term follow-up and overall survival data. In contrast, numerous studies have reported improved overall survival after hepatic resection.6,7 Currently, no randomized studies have compared RFA and resection. The single-arm studies reporting outcomes following RFA do not provide details regarding adjuvant therapy, which further complicates their analysis.

Although RFA is typically used for unresectable tumors, the definition of what is resectable can vary among institutions and individual surgeons. Many hepatic surgeons argue that a lesion that can be ablated is likely to be resectable and, if it is unresectable, then RFA is unlikely to improve survival. Nevertheless, numerous studies report low recurrence rates after RFA for hepatic lesions smaller than 3 cm.3–5 Additionally, RFA can significantly reduce cost and morbidity compared with resection.8

In this issue of Annals of Surgical Oncology, Dr. Elias et al. compare rates of local recurrence and disease-free survival in 88 patients whose hepatic metastases were managed by a combination of anatomic resection, wedge resection, and RFA.9 At a median follow-up of 27.6 months, the local recurrence rate was 6% after RFA, 7.3% after wedge resection, and 12.5% after anatomic resection. Although most hepatic metastases were from colon cancer, eight other types of malignancies were included. Patients with extrahepatic disease were not excluded. Local recurrence rates after RFA were significantly higher when metastases were larger than 3 cm or in close proximity to large blood vessels. The authors suggest that RFA is as effective as wedge resection for metastases smaller than 3 cm and results in fewer complications.

This study, however, suffers from many of the pitfalls previously described: a variety of tumor histologies are examined, limited information regarding systemic chemotherapy is provided, and three different radiofrequency probes were used. The use of different probes increases the risk of incomplete or inconsistent ablations. In addition, local recurrence rates after resection are higher than rates reported in other series.10 Ablation of central and bilobar lesions that may not have been resectable clearly increased the number of patients whose hepatic disease could be completely treated in the operating room. The local recurrence rate of only 6% after RFA can be partially attributed to the use of intraoperative ultrasound, which some studies suggest provides more accurate staging and monitoring of RFA.11 The inclusion of patients with extrahepatic disease did not appear to have a major impact on local recurrence rates. This suggests that more effective adjuvant regimens were used and that the combination of treatments is more effective than local therapy alone.

With numerous new chemotherapeutic and targeted agents available, the possible synergistic effect of debulking needs to be reexamined. Most studies that reported no survival benefit for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases in patients with extrahepatic disease were done in the era of single-agent (5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy,12 which was associated with response rates of only 15% to 20%.13 In the last decade, two additional agents, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, were found to be extremely effective against advanced colorectal cancer; these agents are associated with response rates of 39% to 51% and a significant increase in median survival.14 This year the US Food and Drug Administration approved two angiogenesis inhibitors, bevacizumab (Avastin) and cetuximab (Erbitux), which increase survival when given in combination with standard chemotherapy drugs. The effect of these agents after surgical debulking has not been addressed, but it is plausible that their use might further prolong survival, even in patients with limited extrahepatic disease.

The increasing number of effective therapeutic options for patients with hepatic metastases mandates a close collaboration between surgical and medical oncologists. All cases should be presented at a multidisciplinary conference, and clinical trials should be encouraged. This type of comprehensive management will eventually transform liver metastasis from an invariably fatal condition to one of manageable chronicity. The question is not whether metastatic hepatic malignancies should be resected or ablated, but how we should time and combine therapeutic interventions.

Received for publication March 12, 2004. Accepted for publication March 15, 2004.

REFERENCES

  1. Cady B, Jenkins RL, Steele GD Jr., et al. Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 566–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Bleicher RJ, Allegra DP, Nora DT, Wood TF, Foshag LJ, Bilchik AJ. Radiofrequency ablation in 447 complex unresectable liver tumors: lessons learned. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 52–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Curley SA. New approaches to the treatment of hepatic malignancies. Radiofrequency ablation of malignant liver tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 338–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Curley SA, Izzo F, Delrio P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of unresectable primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies: results in 123 patients. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 1–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Wood TF, Rose DM, Chung M, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of 231 unresectable hepatic tumors: indications, limitations and complications. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 593–600.[Abstract]
  6. Fong Y, Cohen AM, Fortner JG, et al. Liver resection for colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 938–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Raab R, Nussbaum KT, Behrend M, Weimann A. Liver metastases of breast cancer: results of liver resection. Anticancer Res 1998; 18: 2231–3.[Medline]
  8. Oshowo A, Gillams A, Harrison E, Lees WR, Taylor I. Comparison of resection and radiofrequency ablation for treatment of solitary colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1240–3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Elias D, Baton O, Sideris L, Matsuhisa T, Pocard M, Lasser P. Local recurrences after intraoperative radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases: a comparative study with atomic and wedge resections. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11: 500–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. DeMatteo RP, Palese C, Jarnagin WR, et al. Anatomic segmental hepatic resection as oncologic operation for colorectal liver metastasis. J Gastrointest Surg 2000; 4: 198–84.
  11. John T, Greig J, Crosbie J, et al. Superior staging of liver tumors with laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound. Ann Surg 1998; 220: 711–9.
  12. Hughes KS, Simon R, Songhorabodi S, et al. Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases: a multi-institutional study of indications for resection. Surgery 1988; 103: 278–88.[Medline]
  13. Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: evidence in terms of response rate. Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-Analysis Project. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 896–903.[Abstract]
  14. Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, et al. A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 23–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilchik, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilchik, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, S. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS