| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Article |
1 Department of General Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstrasse 12, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
2 Institute of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Süleyman Yedibela, MD; E-mail: suleyman.yedibela{at}chir.imed.uni-erlan-gen.de
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: A retrospective analysis of the records of all patients (n = 153) with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent thoracotomy between 1978 and 2003 at a single surgical center was performed.
Results: One hundred fifty-three patients with pulmonary metastases from colon (n = 61) or rectal (n = 92) cancer underwent 180 thoracotomies. The 2- and 5-year probabilities of survival after the first thoracotomy were 64% and 37%, respectively. Sex, age, site, International Union Against Cancer stage of the primary tumor, prethoracotomy carcinoembryonic antigen level, size of metastases, and previous resection of hepatic metastases were not found to be statistically significant prognostic factors. Number of metastases (solitary vs. multiple), mode of operation (wedge vs. anatomical resection), disease-free interval (DFI; >36 months), negative hilar or mediastinal lymph node status, resection margin >10 mm, and administration of intraoperative blood substitution were predictors of a longer survival duration by univariate analysis, but only number of metastases (P = .019), mode of operation (P = .004), DFI (P = .027), and intraoperative blood substitution (P = .002) were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: Pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal cancer is safe and results in long-term survival in selected patients. Single metastases, anatomical resection, intraoperative blood substitution, and DFI >36 months seem to be the most reliable predictors of survival.
Key Words: Pulmonary metastases Colorectal cancer Surgical resection Prognosis
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One hundred eighty resections were performed in 153 patients during this period. Forty-three (28%) patients had previously undergone resection of hepatic metastases. Eight (5%) patients in whom a thoracotomy was previously performed in another institution were excluded from the following analysis, as were patients with residual tumor in histological examinations (R1; n = 4). Thus, the analysis of this study was based on 141 patients with curative resection of pulmonary metastases (R0).
There were 84 (59%) men and 57 (41%) women, with a median age of 59 years (range, 3282 years) at the time of the first pulmonary resection. The primary tumor was located in the rectum in 85 (60%) cases, whereas colonic cancer in the history was diagnosed in 56 (40%) patients. Lymph node involvement (pN1/2) resulting from the primary tumor was three times more frequent in patients with rectal carcinoma (Table 1
).
|
|
Patients were evaluated for age, sex, primary tumor site, prethoracotomy CEA level, extent of resection, number and size of metastatic lesions, involvement of hilar lymph nodes, tumor-free interval, morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival. The cutoff value for CEA was set at 5 ng/mL. A curative resection (R0) was defined as a histologically con-firmed removal of all tumor lesions. An infiltration of the resection margin with tumor cells in the histological examination was defined as an R1 resection. All cases in which a lymph node dissection was not performed because of clinically (macroscopic and preoperative imaging) undetectable lymph node involvement (metastases) were classified as cN0.
All statistical analyses were calculated by using SPSS for Windows (version 11.5; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The patients were followed up to January 1, 2003, or to the time of their death of any cause. Postoperative death was not excluded from the survival analysis. Observed survival rates were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method.7 Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were calculated by using the Greenwood method. Statistical differences were tested for significance with the log-rank test.8 Statistical significance was set at P < .05. For multivariate analysis of prognostic factors, the Cox regression model9 was used.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The maximum number of lung metastases was eight. One hundred one patients (71%) had solitary metastases, whereas in 40 patients multiple metastases were detected. The median size of the metastases was 18.5 mm (range, 3130 mm).
The overall 2- and 5- year survival rates for all patients (n = 153) were 64% and 37%, with a median survival time of 39 months. After a curative resection (R0), 2- and 5-year survival was 68% and 39%; the median survival time was 43 months. In univariate analysis, survival was not influenced by age, sex, tumor location, or International Union Against Cancer stage of the primary tumor (Table 3
). Likewise, 5-year survival for tumors with a diameter <20 mm (n = 82) did not differ significantly from that for tumors >20 mm (n = 59; 34 % vs. 38%).
|
The number of pulmonary metastases significantly influenced survival (Table 3
; Fig. 1
). The cumulative survival for patients with solitary metastases was 44% at 5 years, whereas that for 40 patients with multiple pulmonary metastases was 24% (median survival, 47 vs. 36 months; P = .048).
|
DFI significantly correlated with survival (P = .004). For analysis, patients were divided into three groups according to DFI (Table 3
). Figure 2
shows a significant advantage of patients who developed pulmonary metastases beyond 3 years after treatment of their primary tumor.
|
The resection margin was <10 mm in 63 patients. In 78 patients, a histological resection margin of >10 mm was measured. Univariate analysis showed a significantly poorer survival in patients with a resection margin <10 mm (P = .038; Table 3
).
The intraoperative administration of packed red blood cells was necessary in 32 patients. This was a significant prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analysis, with a 5-year survival rate of 21%. In contrast, 44% of the patients without intraoperative administration of packed red blood cells were alive after 5 years (P = .002; Table 4
).
|
In this series, univariate analysis identified six favorable prognostic factors (shown in Table 3
): mode of operation, number of pulmonary metastasis, DFI, status of hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes, resection margin, and intraoperative blood transfusion. In multivariate analysis, mode of operation, number of pulmonary metastases, DFI, and intra-operative blood substitution were independent prognostic factors (Table 4
).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The data so far available suggest that lung metastasectomy is able to significantly improve the overall and disease-free survival with acceptable morbidity and mortality. The overall 5-year survival ranges between 24% and 62%.3,1117 In this study, the overall survival for 180 thoracotomies in 153 patients was 37% after 5 years. After curative resection (R0), the 5-year survival rate was 39%, with a median survival time of 43 months.
Various prognostic indicators for patients who undergo thoracotomy for lung metastases from CRC have been suggested in previous articles. As indicated by others, neither age nor sex nor the location of the primary carcinoma (colon or rectum) influenced prognosis.5,12,17,18 We also reported previously that the site of origin of CRC, i.e., colon versus upper rectum, did not influence the incidence of lung metastasis or the outcome after metastasectomy.19 Okumura et al.11 and Inoue et al.16 reported a significantly better survival of patients with Dukes stage A in comparison with Dukes B or C CRC. Vogelsang et al.20 recently identified International Union Against Cancer stage as a variable that significantly affected prognosis after resection of pulmonary metastases in univariate analysis. In our study, neither the location of the primary tumor nor the International Union Against Cancer stage influenced survival significantly (Table 3
).
In the literature, one of the most common prognostic factors is the number of pulmonary metastases. In three of the largest monocentric studies and in one multicenter study, a significantly longer survival was observed for patients with single metastases.11,12,17,21 In accordance with these results, but in contrast to others,3,16,18 we also found a significantly better survival of patients with solitary metastases (Tables 3
and 4
).
A significantly longer survival was reported for patients with a normal prethoracotomy CEA level in most of the large series.12,1618,21,22 Surprisingly, prethoracotomy CEA was not an independent prognostic factor in our analysis. The 5-year survival rate for patients with increased prethoracotomy CEA (>5 ng/mL) was 27% and was only marginally poorer than for those with normal prethoracotomy CEA levels (33%; Table 3
). Therefore, the indication for thoracotomy in pulmonary metastases is not based on preoperative CEA levels in our institution.
Regarding DFI, we subdivided our patient cohort into three groups by following the methods described by the International Registry of Lung Metastases.23 In univariate as well as in multivariate analysis, patients with a DFI >36 months had a significantly better prognosis. Considering the results of studies with large patient numbers (
100 patients), in none of them was DFI a prognostic factor. Rena et al.23 and Zink et al.21 recently reported on 80 and 96 patients with significantly improved survival with a DFI >36 months.
Although in nearly all large series wedge resection is considered as the procedure of choice, whereas lobectomy should be avoided whenever possible, our data indicate that an anatomical resection is accompanied by a significant better prognosis. In our institution, we advocate wedge resection in peripheral lesions or in patients with compromised pulmonary function. Wedge resection should not be forced in centrally located lesions with uncertain resection margins. In these cases, we prefer an anatomical resection together with a dissection of suspicious lymph nodes, if necessary.
Although in many reports the significance of lymph node dissection is underlined,12,18,19,22 we could not observe a difference in patients with and without positive lymph nodes in multivariate analysis. In our opinion, the value of lymph node dissection remains unclear, so we do not routinely perform regional lymphadenectomy.
Resection margins were not analyzed in relation to pulmonary metastasectomy. In accordance with our results for resection of colorectal liver metastases,25 we separately analyzed patients with a resection margin of less than and more than 10 mm. In univariate analysis we observed a significantly longer survival for patients with resection margins >10 mm, but in multivariate analysis this difference did not reach statistical significance. This may partly explain the better prognosis for anatomically resected metastases.
Our data indicate that patients with packed red blood cells administered during surgery had a significantly shorter survival if the cutoff value of two units packed red blood cells was exceeded. No published study had analyzed this variable previously.
In summary, the long-term follow-up data after curative resection for pulmonary CRC metastases indicate satisfying survival rates and, therefore, support an aggressive surgical approach for this particular metastatic disease. In view of the low perioperative morbidity and mortality and the lack of appropriate treatment alternatives, we therefore recommend that metastasectomy should be performed whenever the metastatic lesions can be resected completely.
Received for publication February 4, 2006. Accepted for publication May 19, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Vigano, A. Ferrero, R. L. Tesoriere, and L. Capussotti Liver Surgery for Colorectal Metastases: Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up. Long-Term Survivors, Late Recurrences, and Prognostic Role of Morbidity Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2458 - 2464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pandey Biological Behavior of Perihepatic Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Impact on Prognosis Following Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2620 - 2620. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Fernando Radiofrequency Ablation to Treat Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Metastases Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): S780 - S784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |