Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/ASO.2006.07.018
Annals of Surgical Oncology 13:947-954 (2006)
© 2006 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mori, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mori, M.

Original Article

Specific Gene-Expression Profiles of Noncancerous Liver Tissue Predict the Risk for Multicentric Occurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hepatitis C Virus–Positive Patients

Masahiro Okamoto, MD1, Tohru Utsunomiya, MD1, Shigeki Wakiyama, MD2, Masaji Hashimoto, MD3, Kengo Fukuzawa, MD4, Takahiro Ezaki, MD5, Taizo Hanai, MD6, Hiroshi Inoue, MD1 and Masaki Mori, MD1

1 Department of Molecular and Surgical Oncology, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Tsurumihara 4546, Beppu, 874-0838, Japan
2 Department of Surgery, Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, Japan
3 Department of Digestive Surgery, Toranomon Hospital and Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Tokyo, Japan
4 Department of Surgery, Oita Red Cross Hospital, Oita, Japan
5 Department of Surgery, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
6 Laboratory for Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Systems Life Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Masaki Mori, MD; E-mail: mmori{at}beppu.kyushu-u.ac.jp.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection produces chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and, ultimately, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A molecular analysis of the damaged liver tissues infected with HCV may identify specific gene-expression profiles associated with a risk for liver carcinogenesis.

Methods: Forty patients with HCV-positive HCC were classified into two groups: single nodular HCC group (n = 28) and multicentric HCC group (n = 12). Using a complementary DNA microarray, we compared the gene-expression patterns of the noncancerous liver tissue specimens between the two groups. We also identified the differentially expressed genes related to multicentric recurrence in the liver remnant. We then evaluated whether a specific gene-expression profile can accurately estimate the risk for multicentric hepatocarcinogenesis.

Results: We selected the 230 differentially expressed genes in the multicentric HCC group. A hierarchical clustering analysis identified a cluster that might be closely associated with the multicentric occurrence of HCC. On the basis of the gene-expression profiling of the 36 genes commonly associated with both multicentric HCC and multicentric recurrence, we created a scoring system to estimate the risk for multicentric hepatocarcinogenesis. The prediction score of patients in the multicentric HCC group with multicentric recurrence (19.9 ± 9.2) was significantly higher (P < .05) than that in the single nodular HCC group without multicentric recurrence (–1.8 ± 12.7).

Conclusions: Specific gene-expression signatures in noncancerous liver tissue may help to accurately predict the risk for developing HCC.

Key Words: Hepatocellular carcinoma • Multicentric occurrence • Hepatitis C virus • DNA microarray


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy that causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide,1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is closely associated with the development of HCC.2 Although the mechanisms of liver carcinogenesis associated with HCV infection are still not well known, the increased turnover of hepatocytes and inflammatory cell infiltrate seen in chronic HCV hepatitis and cirrhosis may lead to an accumulation of genetic alterations that ultimately result in the development of HCC.3,4

The long-term results of hepatic resection for HCC in cirrhotic patients have been disappointing because of the high rate of intrahepatic recurrence as a result of either multicentric occurrence or intrahepatic metastasis of HCC.5,6 The dismal outcomes of HCC patients even after a curative hepatectomy have been, at least partially, due to its multicentric origin.79

Several studies have shown that the specific gene-expression patterns in cancerous tissues of HCC could accurately predict early intrahepatic recurrence, possibly because of the intrahepatic metastasis of HCC.10,11 However, to examine the molecular mechanisms during the process of liver carcinogenesis on the basis of the idea of field cancerization, it is thus considered reasonable to investigate the non-cancerous portion of the liver tissue because multicentric occurrence of HCC is mainly associated with underlying chronic liver damage rather than adverse tumor factors.7,12 Because molecular alterations in hepatocarcinogenesis might differ regarding the etiology of chronic liver damage,12 in this study, we focused on examining noncancerous liver tissues obtained from patients with HCV-related HCC. We then attempted to explore a specific gene-expression signature that could enable us to accurately predict the risk for multicentric hepatocarcinogenesis.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Liver Tissue Samples
Forty patients with HCV-positive HCC and seven patients with colorectal liver metastasis who had undergone an initial hepatectomy at our institute and the affiliated hospitals were entered onto this study. The last seven patients were carefully examined and found to be seronegative for either hepatitis B surface antigen or HCV antibody, and they all had liver function values within the normal limits and had histologically normal livers. The resected noncancerous liver tissue specimens were meticulously taken as far from the tumor as possible and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at –80°C until the following RNA preparation. According to The General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer (4th edition),13 intrahepatic metastases of HCC were defined as (1) tumors that seemed to have developed from portal tumor emboli, (2) tumors that were distributed in a gradient-like pattern (i.e., clustered more densely around the largest lesion and more sparsely farther from it), and (3) tumors that had separate tumors near the largest lesion that were clearly smaller than the largest lesion and were histologically similar to or less differentiated than the largest one. In this study, patients with intrahepatic metastasis of HCC and those with tumors too difficult to clarify were excluded. We also excluded patients who developed early recurrence within 18 months that was obviously due to the intrahepatic metastases of HCC, as determined by the imaging strategies, including abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), CT during arterial portography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).14

Forty samples were classified into two groups on the basis of the histological findings: noncancerous tissue specimens from the patients with single nodular HCC (SN group; n = 28) and those from the patients with multicentric HCC (MC group; n = 12). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients according to the guidelines approved by the institutional research board at each hospital. All patients were closely followed up after surgery at regular 1-month intervals. The mean follow-up time was 33 months (range, 18–41 months). Each follow-up visit included a physical examination, blood chemistry tests, and measurements of the serum levels of alfa fetoprotein and proteins induced by vitamin K absence II. Abdominal ultrasonography, CT, and MRI were all performed at 3- to 4-month intervals. When recurrence was suspected, the patient was readmitted for an angiographic examination.15

RNA Preparation
Total liver RNA was isolated from frozen tissue by a guanidine/cesium trifluoroacetate extraction method by using a Quick Prep total RNA extraction kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK). To ensure the use of only high-quality RNA, the concentration and purity were determined by an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA).16

Complementary DNA Microarray (Labeling, Hybridization, and Scanning)
We used the commercially available Agilent Human 1 cDNA Microarray that contains 12,814 clones, listed at http://www.agilent.com/chem/genelists. Twenty-microgram aliquots of each total RNA from the 40 liver tissue specimens infected with HCV were labeled with Cy5-deoxyuridine triphosphate (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), whereas a 20-µg aliquot of total RNA from a mixture of the 7 normal liver samples was labeled with Cy3-deoxyuridine triphosphate as a control. The labeled probes were hybridized with an Agilent Human 1 cDNA Microarray Kit in hybridization buffer for 17 hours at 65°C. After hybridization, the slides were washed in .5x standard saline citrate and .01% sodium dodecylsulfate for 5 minutes at room temperature and .06x standard saline citrate for 2 minutes at 22°C. The Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescent intensities for each clone were determined by a confocal laser scanner (MAS-O; Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed by ArrayGauge (version 1.2; Fuji Photo Film) to correct for any background signals. The expression values were calculated as the logarithm of Cy5:Cy3 ratios and normalized by the ArrayGauge software. The expression levels below 1 U (a cutoff value of this scanner) were assigned a value of 1. When the gene was not expressed in Cy5 or Cy3 signals (expression value = 0), the data were defined as missing.17

Identification of Differentially Regulated Genes
We compared the nontumor liver tissue specimens in the MC group (n = 12) with those in the SN group (n = 28) by using Student’s t-test and calculated the signal-to-noise ratio for each gene. The signal-to-noise ratio is calculated as follows:


Formula 1(1)

where µ and {sigma} represent the mean and standard deviation of expression values for the MC group and SN group, respectively. We considered a gene to be a "multicentric HCC-associated gene" when its P value was <.05. Among the 40 patients with HCC, 15 patients were found to develop multicentric recurrence in their liver remnant during our follow-up period. We then compared the noncancerous liver samples in the patients with recurrence (n = 15) with those in the patients without recurrence in the liver remnant (n = 25) by using Student’s t-test and calculated the P value for each gene. We considered the gene to be a "multicentric recurrence-associated gene" when its P value was <.05.

Development of Prediction Scores for the Risk of Multicentric Hepatocarcinogenesis
Assume that we have m cases whose prediction scores were to be calculated and n genes that were valuable for predicting the multicentric hepatocarcinogenesis. Let Eij be the gene expression value of gene j, for j = 1....n, measured by complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray in case i, for i = 1....m. We first calculated the Sij of gene j in case i as below:


Formula 2(2)

where Ejmc is the mean expression value of the patients in the MC group and Ejsn is that of the patients in the SN group. If Sij is >1.0, then Sij is assigned a value of 1.0, and if Sij is less than –1.0, then Sij is assigned a value of –1.0. We then calculated the prediction score of the multicentric recurrence of case i (Si):


Formula 3(3)

where Wj is the signal-to-noise ratio of each gene (j) as calculated according to formula 1. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering18 was applied by using the complete linkage method by Cluster and Tree-view software obtained from http://rana.lbl.gov/EisenSoftware.htm.

Statistical Analysis
For continuous variables, the data were expressed as mean ± SD. We used the {chi}2 test and Student’s t-test to assess whether clinicopathologic factors were associated with multicentric occurrence of HCC. The survival curves were plotted according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and the generalized Wilcoxon test was applied to compare the survival curve. We used analysis of variance to compare the prediction scores among the groups, and statistical significance was estimated by the Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference test. The findings were considered to be significant when the P value was <.05.

Additional Microarray Information
This microarray study followed the minimum information about a microarray experiment guidelines issued by the Microarray Gene Expression Data group.19


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis in Patients With Multicentric HCC
Table 1Go summarizes the clinicopathologic variables of the patients in the MC group (n = 12) and the SN group (n = 28). No differences were observed between the two groups regarding the liver function tests and pathologic variables regarding both the tumor factors and nontumorous liver tissues. We compared the disease-free survival curves after a curative hepatectomy between the two groups (Fig. 1Go). The disease-free survival rate of patients in the MC group was significantly lower than that of the patients in the SN group (P < .05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Background and pathologic factors of patients in the SN group and the MC group at the time of hepatectomy
 

Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Disease-free survival rate after a curative hepatectomy in the single nodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) group (SN group) and the multicentric HCC (MC) group of the patients with hepatitis C virus–positive HCC.

 
Differentially Regulated Genes Based on a cDNA Microarray Analysis
Using a cDNA microarray of more than 12,000 clones, we identified 101 upregulated and 129 down-regulated genes that were significantly (P < .05) associated with a multicentric occurrence of HCC (MC group). A hierarchical clustering analysis of the 40 patients with HCV-positive HCC using these 230 genes yielded 4 large clusters (Fig. 2Go). All of the patients in MC group were included in the two clusters (clusters III and IV). Recurrence in a liver remnant of the patients in cluster III (9 of 15; 60%) was significantly (P < .05) more than that of those in the remaining three clusters (6 of 25; 24%). Next, we tried to identify the differentially expressed genes associated with multicentric recurrence after a curative hepatectomy. We identified 420 upregulated and 107 downregulated genes in the patients with multicentric recurrence compared with those without recurrence in the liver remnant.


Figure 2
View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. A hierarchical clustering analysis of the 40 patients with hepatitis C virus–positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using 230 multicentric HCC-associated genes determined by Student’s t-test (P < .05). The patients in the multicentric HCC (MC) group are labeled with blue shadow, and the patients with recurrence in the liver remnant are indicated by an asterisk. A dendrogram has four large clusters, and all cases belonging to the MC group were within the last two clusters (clusters III and IV). The cases with multicentric recurrence in the liver remnant significantly accumulated in the third cluster (P < .05) compared with the other clusters. Each row in the heat map represents a single gene, and each column represents a patient sample. The color scale at the bottom indicates the relative expression levels in terms of standard deviations from the mean.

 
Development of Quantitative Scores for the Risk of Multicentric Hepatocarcinogenesis
The Venn diagram (Fig. 3AGo) shows that 36 genes were common for both the multicentric HCC-associated genes and the multicentric recurrence-associated genes (Table 2Go). On the basis of the gene-expression patterns of the 36 marker genes, we developed the prediction scores for multicentric occurrence of HCC. We classified the 40 patients into the following 4 groups: group A, patients belonging to the SN group with no evidence of recurrence in the liver remnant (n = 21); group B, patients in the SN group with multicentric recurrence (n = 7); group C, patients in the MC group without recurrence in the liver remnant (n = 4); and group D, patients in the MC group with multicentric recurrence (n = 8). Figure 3BGo shows the correlation between the prediction score and the presence or absence of multicentric HCC and multicentric recurrence in the liver remnant. The prediction scores in group D (19.9 ± 9.2) were significantly higher (P <.05) than those in group A (–11.8 ± 12.7). It is interesting to note that the scores of all patients in group A were <10 points, whereas those of all patients in group D were >10 points.


Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Predictive scoring system for the multicentric recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on a specific gene-expression profile. (A) A Venn diagram showing the relationship of the 230 multicentric occurrence–associated genes, 527 multicentric recurrence–associated genes, and 36 genes that are used for calculating the prediction score. (B) The prediction scores are shown of 40 patients with hepatitis C virus–positive HCC based on the gene-expression profiles of noncancerous liver tissue at the time of hepatectomy. aP < .05 versus group A; bP < .05 versus group D. P values were determined by the Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference test. A closed circle represents the prediction score of each patient, and a short bar indicates the average score in each group. SN, single nodular HCC group; MC, multicentric HCC group.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. The 36 genes commonly associated with the multicentric occurrence–associated genes and the multicentric recurrence–associated genes
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The identification of risk factors for hepatocarcinogenesis may provide us with an opportunity to make an early diagnosis and effectively intervene with preventative and therapeutic strategies for HCC. Clinically, a significant association between the histological degrees of hepatitis and the recurrence in the liver remnant, possibly caused by multicentric recurrence, after a curative hepatectomy in patients with HCV-related HCC has been reported.4 More recently, the early molecular changes associated with liver carcinogenesis have been investigated by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction20 and cDNA microarrays.12,21 However, no gold standard diagnostic modality or clear clinicopathologic parameters are currently available to estimate the risk for human liver carcinogenesis, and, to the best of our knowledge, the establishment of a scoring system to predict such a risk has never been attempted. In this study, we hypothesized that the noncancerous liver tissues simultaneously having multicentric HCC (MC group) might possess a higher premalignant potential to develop HCC compared with the SN group and, therefore, hypothesized that marked differences in the gene-expression patterns must exist between the two groups.

Using the technique of a cDNA microarray analysis, we identified the differentially expressed genes associated with multicentric HCC (230 multicentric HCC-associated genes). A hierarchical clustering analysis revealed one particular cluster (cluster III) that contained more patients with both multicentric HCC and multicentric recurrence compared with the other clusters (Fig. 2Go). These findings suggest that common features in the gene-expression patterns might exist between synchronous multicentric HCC and metachronous multicentric recurrence. We next selected the differentially expressed genes associated with multicentric recurrence in the liver remnant (527 multicentric recurrence-associated genes). In this study, we histopathologically defined synchronous multicentric HCC according to The General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer.13 We defined the multicentric recurrence of HCC according to the findings of imaging modalities such as CT, CT during arterial portography, and MRI.14 We initially excluded any patients who developed early recurrences within 18 months that were apparently caused by intrahepatic metastases of HCC. Therefore, the recurrence in the liver remnant detected in the 15 patients were considered to be due to multicentric recurrence, although the mean follow-up time was relatively short. One of these 15 patients who underwent a repeat hepatectomy for a recurrent tumor was histopathologically determined to have multicentric recurrence. The patients diagnosed as having both intrahepatic metastases and multicentric occurrence of HCC were included in the patients with multicentric recurrences because the gene-expression patterns in the noncancerous liver tissues of these patients should theoretically reflect the risk for the multicentric occurrence of HCC. We subsequently identified a common gene-expression signature shared by the multicentric HCC-related genes and the multicentric recurrence-related genes (Fig. 3AGo). These 36 genes might serve as diagnostic markers for the development of HCC (Table 2Go). For example, the Fps/Fes proto-oncogene promotes angiogenesis,22 and it has also been associated with the development and progression of anaplastic thyroid cancer and colon cancer.23 Oncoprotein 18 (Op18)/stathmin was initially identified as a protein phosphorylated in response to several extracellular signals,24 and its function is thought to destabilize microtubules and promote catastrophe. Op18 was highly expressed in leukemias, breast cancers, and ovarian cancers, and it was also associated with a poor prognosis in patients with medulloblastoma.25

Finally, we were able to successfully create a scoring system to estimate the risk for the multicentric occurrence of HCC, based on the gene-expression signatures of the 36 genes (Fig. 3BGo). These findings suggest that the patients with higher prediction scores are more likely to develop HCC. Therefore, strict follow-up examinations in the liver remnant are recommended for patients with high scores, such as >10 points, even if they currently have no evidence of multicentric recurrence. Although we could not evaluate our scoring system in an independent group of HCC patients because of an insufficient number of patients, this method may help us to identify a previously unrecognized group of patients who have a high risk for developing HCC. Moreover, it is likely that our cDNA micro-array-based strategy is also applicable to other multifocal tumors,26 such as head and neck carcinoma, skin carcinoma, and lung carcinoma, to predict the risk for carcinogenesis.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (17109013, 17591411, 17591413, 17015032, and 16390381), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and a Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant on Hepatitis and BSE (14230801; the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan). Also supported by CREST, JST, Uehara Memorial Foundation, Yasuda Medical Research Foundation, Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer, and Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund.


    FOOTNOTES
 
M. Okamoto and T. Utsunomiya contributed equally to this study.

Received for publication July 19, 2005. Accepted for publication January 4, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. El Serag HB, Mason AC. Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:745–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Tsukuma H, Hiyama T, Tanaka S, et al. Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1797–801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sherlock S. Viruses and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 1994; 35:828–32.[Free Full Text]
  4. Tarao K, Rino Y, Ohkawa S, et al. Association between high serum alanine aminotransferase levels and more rapid development and higher rate of incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus-associated cirrhosis. Cancer 1999; 86:589–95.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Utsunomiya T, Matsumata T, Adachi E, et al. Limitations of current preoperative liver imaging techniques for intrahepatic metastatic nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1992; 16:694–701.[Medline]
  6. Shimada M, Takenaka K, Gion T, et al. Prognosis of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a 10-year surgical experience in Japan. Gastroenterology 1996; 111:720–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, et al. Different risk factors and prognosis for early and late intrahepatic recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89:500–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Takenaka K, Adachi E, Nishizaki T, et al. Possible multicentric occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinicopathological study. Hepatology 1994; 19:889–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Kumada T, Nakano S, Takeda I, et al. Patterns of recurrence after initial treatment in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1997; 25:87–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Iizuka N, Oka M, Yamada Okabe H, et al. Oligonucleotide microarray for prediction of early intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Lancet 2003; 361:923–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Kurokawa Y, Matoba R, Takemasa I, et al. Molecular-based prediction of early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2004; 41:284–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Kim JW, Ye Q, Forgues M, et al. Cancer-associated molecular signature in the tissue samples of patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2004; 39:518–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. 2000. The General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer. 4th ed. Tokyo: Kanahara Shuppan, p 32–3.
  14. Ueno S, Aoki D, Maeda T, et al. Preoperative assessment of multicentric occurrence in synchronous small and multiple hepatocellular carcinoma based on image-patterns and histological grading of non-cancerous region. Hepatol Res 2004; 29:24–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Utsunomiya T, Shimada M, Taguchi KI, et al. Clinicopathologic features and postoperative prognosis of multicentric small hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 190:331–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Nishida K, Mine S, Utsunomiya T, et al. Global analysis of altered gene expressions during the process of esophageal squamous cell carcinogenesis in the rat: a study combined with a laser microdissection and a cDNA microarray. Cancer Res 2005; 65:401–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Utsunomiya T, Okamoto M, Hashimoto M, et al. A gene-expression signature can quantify the degree of hepatic fibrosis in the rat. J Hepatol 2004; 41:399–406.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, et al. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:14863–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MI-AME)—toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 2001; 29:365–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Colombat M, Paradis V, Bieche I, et al. Quantitative RT-PCR in cirrhotic nodules reveals gene expression changes associated with liver carcinogenesis. J Pathol 2003; 201:260–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Anders RA, Yerian LM, Tretiakova M, et al. cDNA micro-array analysis of macroregenerative and dysplastic nodules in end-stage hepatitis C virus-induced cirrhosis. Am J Pathol 2003; 162:991–1000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Greer P, Haigh J, Mbamalu G, et al. The Fps/Fes protein-tyrosine kinase promotes angiogenesis in transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:6755–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Orlovsky K, Theodor L, Malovani H, et al. Gamma interferon down-regulates Fer and induces its association with inactive Stat3 in colon carcinoma cells. Oncogene 2002; 21:4997–5001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Larsson N, Segerman B, Howell B, et al. Op18/stathmin mediates multiple region-specific tubulin and microtubule-regulating activities. J Cell Biol 1999; 146:1289–302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Neben K, Korshunov A, Benner A, et al. Microarray-based screening for molecular markers in medulloblastoma revealed STK15 as independent predictor for survival. Cancer Res 2004; 64:3103–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Vauthey JN, Walsh GL, Vlastos G, et al. Importance of field cancerisation in clinical oncology. Lancet Oncol 2000; 1:15–6.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
X.-D. Zhu, J.-B. Zhang, P.-Y. Zhuang, H.-G. Zhu, W. Zhang, Y.-Q. Xiong, W.-Z. Wu, L. Wang, Z.-Y. Tang, and H.-C. Sun
High Expression of Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Peritumoral Liver Tissue Is Associated With Poor Survival After Curative Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 26(16): 2707 - 2716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mori, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mori, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS