Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-006-9254-y
Annals of Surgical Oncology 14:739-743 (2007)
© 2007 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.

Original Article

Radioguided Parathyroidectomy in Patients with Familial Hyperparathyroidism

Alysandra Lal, MD1, Jesus Bianco, MD2 and Herbert Chen, MD, FACS1

1 Department of Surgery, Section of Endocrine Surgery, University of Wisconsin, H4/750 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA
2 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Herbert Chen, MD FACS. Department of Surgery, Section of Endocrine Surgery, University of Wisconsin, H4/750 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA; E-mail: chen{at}surgery.wisc.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: In patients with sporadic hyperparathyroidism (HPT), radioguided parathyroidectomy (RGP) has been shown to facilitate intraoperative localization of parathyroid glands, reduced operative time, and improve patient outcomes. No studies have focused on the role of RGP in patients with familial HPT.

Methods: Between 3/01 and 6/05, 419 patients underwent RGP. Nineteen had familial HPT, including 12 with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (MEN), and 94 had sporadic HPT with parathyroid hyperplasia. All patients were injected with sestamibi pre-operatively and a gamma probe was used intraoperatively. Radiotracer counts were recorded prospectively.

Results: In patients with familial HPT, the gamma probe detected all abnormal parathyroid glands with a mean in vivo radiotracer count of 157 ± 9% above background. Importantly, 5 patients (25%) had ectopic parathyroid glands localized by the probe in the thymus, thyroid and retroesophageal region. All resected hyperplastic parathyroid glands had ex vivo counts > 20%. All patients were cured after surgery with mean calcium and parathyroid hormone levels of 9.4 ± 0.1 mg/dl and 31 ± 7 pg/ml, respectively, and a mean hospital stay of 0.7 ± 0.1 days. In comparing the 2 groups, while patients with familial HPT had lower pre-operative parathyroid hormone levels, the ex vivo radiotracer counts were significantly higher.

Conclusion: RGP in patients with familial HPT is technically feasible and perhaps more sensitive than in patients with sporadic hyperplastic disease. The gamma probe efficiently localized all parathyroid glands including those in ectopic locations, and resulted in high cure rates and short hospital stays. RGP is a viable and useful technique in patients with familial HPT.

Key Words: Parathyroidectomy • Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy • Radioguided parathyroidectomy • MIRP • Multiple endocrine neoplasia


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The only curative treatment for hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is parathyroidectomy. Originally described by Felix Mandl in 19251, there have been many novel techniques applied to this procedure. In patients with sporadic hyperparathyroidism, radio-guided parathyroidectomy (RGP) has been shown to facilitate intraoperative localization of parathyroid glands, reduced operative time, and potentially improve patient outcomes. This has been proven to be efficacious in patients in patients with primary24 secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism.5 However, no studies have focused on the feasibility and efficacy of RGP in patients with familial HPT, including multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN).

Hyperparathyroidism is the most common endocrine manifestation of MEN type 1 (MEN1). Almost all patients with MEN1 develop hyperparathyroidism, often with multiple affected glands and with an increased risk of recurrence.6 For this reason, it is essential to locate and remove all glands performing a total parathyroidectomy with reimplantation, or a sub-total parathyroidectomy.7 Multiple studies have shown the high propensity of patients with MEN to have persistent or recurrent disease after parathyroidectomy, with significantly increased rates of recurrence with anything less than a subtotal parathyroidectomy. Therefore it is paramount to locate all parathyroid glands in these patients. RGP may facilitate location of these glands, particularly when they are ectopic.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Between March 2001 and June 2005, 419 consecutive patients underwent RGP by a single surgeon at our institution. Of these patients, 19 had familial HPT including 12 (63%) with MEN and seven with one or more relatives who had endocrine tumors. Of the patients with a familial history, three had siblings with HPT, one patient had a nephew with HPT, one patient had a cousin with HPT and two patients had extensive family histories of HPT without the diagnosis of MEN. Ninety-four patients had sporadic parathyroid hyperplasia. All patients were injected with 10 mCi of technetium99m sestamibi 1–2 h prior to surgery. Patients with MEN did not have sestamibi studies but patients with other types of familial hyperparathyroidism did undergo sestamibi scans and were then eligible for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Pre-operative ultrasound was not routinely used and screening of these patients consisted of physical exam surveillance for thyroid nodules. If a thyroid nodule was palpated or suspected, ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was performed. Intraoperatively, a 11 mm collimated gamma probe (Neoprobe 2000, Ethicon Endo-Surgery Breast-Care, Cincinnati, OH, USA) was used to obtain background counts on the thyroid isthmus through the skin. After an incision was made, the probe was again used to localized the gland by looking for counts exceeding the background. Once the parathyroid gland was identified, the gamma probe was placed on the gland and these counts were recorded as "in vivo" counts and expressed as a percent of the background counts. After the gland was excised, the gamma probe was again used to obtain counts (with the probe pointing away from the patient) and these counts were recorded as the "ex vivo" value. Again, ex vivo counts were expressed as a percentage of the background.

Intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels were checked prior to parathyroid resection and at both five and ten minutes after resection.8 A fall in PTH confirmed that all affected parathyroids were removed. Radioguided techniques assisted with localization of the parathyroids but did not replace the use of intraoperative PTH testing to confirm adequacy of resection.

All data were recorded prospectively. Surgical cure was defined as a serum calcium level less than 10.5 mg/dL at 6 months after surgery. Recurrence was defined as a serum calcium greater than 10.5 mg/dl in consecutive samples anytime beyond six months postoperatively. If a serum calcium remained above 10.5 mg/dl within 6 months, we defined this as persistent disease. Median follow-up was 32 months. Data were recorded as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS program (SPSS Inc.). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We compared 19 patients with familial HPT with 94 patients who had sporadic parathyroid hyperplasia. Eleven of the 19 patients had MEN1, one had MEN2 and the rest had family histories of HPT. Of the seven patients with a familial history, three had siblings with HPT, one patient had a nephew with HPT, one patient had a cousin with HPT and two patients had extensive family histories of HPT without the diagnosis of MEN. Etiology of hyperparathyroidism in the familial group was divided between patients with single adenoma (n = 9), double adenoma (n = 1) and hyperplasia (n = 9). The groups were comparable in age and pre-operative laboratory values except for PTH (Table 1Go). Patients with familial disease had a significantly lower pre-operative PTH (131 ± 25 vs. 345 ± 44 pg/ml, P = 0.035) likely due to the increased number of patients with adenomas in the familial group. Post-operatively, the PTH was comparable (30 ± 7 vs. 38 ± 4 pg/ml). The mean hospital stay (LOS) was shorter in patients with familial disease. All patients were cured after surgery with a mean calcium and parathyroid hormone level of 9.4 ± 0.1 mg/dl and 31 ± 7 pg/ml, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics
 
In the 19 patients with familial HPT, the gamma probe detected all abnormal parathyroid glands with a mean in vivo radiotracer count of 157 ± 9% above background. All resected hyperplastic parathyroid glands had ex vivo counts >20% of the background. Intraoperative frozen section was not utilized in any case. The mean ex vivo counts were 75 ± 7% in the familial group and 53 ± 4% in the sporadic group with P < 0.011 (Table 2Go). There was no statistical significance between gland weights in the two groups. In the familial group weights ranged from 189 to 2,256 mg (mean 678 ± 114 mg) and in the sporadic group weights ranged from 80 to 5,138 mg (mean 889 ± 99 mg). This shows that the probe detected even very minimally enlarged parathyroid glands. In vivo counts, expressed as a percentage of the background, were similar in both groups (familial group 157 ± 9% and sporadic group 142 ± 4%). Time between injection with radioisotope and surgery was almost the same in both groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Intraoperative data
 
We initially compared patients with familial HPT, including patients with affected relatives as well as patients with MEN, in a single group. We compared the gamma probe counts in patients with MEN to those with other familial forms of HPT. To test the validity of grouping these two subsets together we compared gland weight, injection time, in vivo and ex vivo counts of patients with MEN and those with other familial HPT associations (Table 3Go). We found that there was no difference between the groups with p values ranging from 0.052 for the ex vivo counts to 0.682 for the gland weight. These are the same variables compared with our controls in Table 2Go. Therefore, we found that radioguided detection of the abnormal parathyroid glands apply equally to these conditions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Familial data breakdown
 
These results show that not only is RGP sensitive in patients with familial HPT but it also was helpful for finding ectopic glands. Five patients (25%) had ectopic parathyroid glands localized by the probe. These glands were found in the thymus (2), thyroid (1) and in the retroesophageal region (2). No patients have had recurrence and all were cured of (Figs. 1Go, 2Go, 3Go) their HPT.


Figure 1
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Localization of a parathyroid using the gamma probe.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Ex vivo counts of a hyperplastic parathyroid gland.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Patient with six parathyroid glands excised.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Radioguided parathyroidectomy remains controversial, and has not yet been described in patients with familial hyperparathyroidism. We have demonstrated the benefit of this technology for locating ectopic glands3,9,10 for reducing OR time5 and for obviating the need for frozen section.3,4,11 We hypothesized that RGP would be possible in patients with familial HPT because we have found it to be valuable in all groups of patients to which it has been applied. Patients with primary HPT adenomas and hyperplastic glands,3,4 as well as those with secondary and tertiary HPT,5 have had good results with RGP. In addition, this technique has been applied to patients with mediastinal parathyroids undergoing Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) localization of these lesions.1214 For patients who have recurrence in their forearm grafts, radioguided techniques can help to localize these glands as well.15 Our data further supports the efficacy of this technique in patients with HPT due to parathyroid adenomas and hyperplastic parathyroid glands.

Previous studies have shown that intraoperative PTH testing is the most sensitive means for determinine adequate resection of all affected glands.8 We continued to utilize this technique but in addition we used radioguided techniques to localize affected glands. This was particularly useful in patients who did not have sestimibi scans pre-operatively. We feel that these are complimentary techniques: RGP facilitates localization of the abnormal parathyroid glands while intraoperative PTH testing confirms adequacy of parathyroid resection.

This is the first dedicated examination of patients with familial disease for whom RGP was utilized to localize glands intra-operatively. Because of the need for four gland localization with MEN, we were concerned that RGP might not be sensitive enough to detect all the glands. However, our experience was that even very small glands were detected and we found it to be more sensitive in patients with familial disease than in patients with sporadic disease. The gamma probe efficiently localized all hyperplastic parathyroid glands including those in ectopic locations. Ability to localize ectopic glands is particularly valuable in patients with familial HPT due to these patients’ historically high rate of recurrence. No patients in our series had a recurrent disease with a mean follow up of 32 months.

The outcomes in patients with familial HPT undergoing RGP were on par with traditional localizations techniques. Familial patients had comparable to the benefit of this technique as has been previously shown in other populations. Patients had a decreased length of stay compared to historical controls, and compared with our patients who had RGP for hyperplasia. There were no complications of RGP and all patients were cured.

In conclusion, we have shown that RGP is technically feasible and that it confers the advantages of obviating the need for frozen section and assisting in localization of ectopic glands. We advocate the use of radioguided techniques in patients with familial hyperparathyroidism as an adjunct to intraoperative parathyroid testing.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Presented at the 59th annual meeting of the Society for Surgical Oncology, San Diego, CA 24 March 2006

Received for publication May 10, 2006. Accepted for publication October 4, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Mandl F. Therapeutisher versuch bein falls von ostitis fibrosa generalisata mittles. Extirpation eines epithelkorpenchen tumors. Wien Klin Woecheshr Zentral 1926; 143:245–284.
  2. Norman J, Chheda H, Farrell C. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: decreasing operative time and potential complications while improving cosmetic results. Am Surg 1998; 64:391–395.[Medline]
  3. Chen H, Mack E, Starling JR. Radioguided parathyroidectomy is equally effective for both adenomatous and hyper-plastic glands. Ann Surg 2003; 238:332–337.[Medline]
  4. Chen H, Mack E, Starling JR. A comprehensive evaluation of perioperative adjuncts during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: which is most reliable? Ann Surg 2005; 242:375–380.[Medline]
  5. Nichol PF, Mack E, Bianco J, Hayman A, Starling JR, Chen H. Radioguided parathyroidectomy in patients with secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 2003; 134:713–717.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Skogseid B, Rastad J, Oberg K. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Clinical features and screening. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1994; 23:1–18.[Medline]
  7. Carling T, Udelsman R. Parathyroid surgery in familial hyperparathyroid disorders. J Intern Med 2005; 257:27–37.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Chen H, Sokoll LJ, Udelsman R. Outpatient minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: a combination of sestamibi-SPECT localization, cervical block anesthesia, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay. Surgery 1999; 126:1016–1021.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Frydman J, Bianco J, Drezner M, Chen H. Thallium-pertechnetate subtraction scanning in the preoperative localization of an ectopic undescended parathyroid gland. Clin Nucl Med 2004; 29:542–544.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Satchie B, Chen H. Radioguided techniques for parathyroid surgery. Asian J Surg 2005; 28[2]:77–81.[Medline]
  11. Satchie B, Chen H. Radioguided techniques for parathyroid surgery. Asian J Surg 2005; 28[2]:77–81.[Medline]
  12. O’Herrin JK, Weigel T, Wilson M, Chen H. Radioguided parathyroidectomy via VATS combined with intraoperative parathyroid hormone testing: the surgical approach of choice for patients with mediastinal parathyroid adenomas? J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17:1368–1371.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Wild JL, Weigel T, Chen H. The need for intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring during radioguided parathyroidectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS). Clin Nucl Med 2006; 31:9–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Weigel TL, Murphy J, Kabbani L, Ibele A, Chen H. Radio-guided thoracoscopic mediastinal parathyroidectomy with intraoperative parathyroid hormone testing. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80:1262–1265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sippel RS, Bianco J, Chen H. Radioguided parathyroidectomy for recurrent hyperparathyroidism caused by forearm graft hyperplasia. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18:939–942.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
H. Chen
Author Reply
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 380 - 381.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
M. Friedman, B. Gurpinar, P. Schalch, and N. J. Joseph
Guidelines for Radioguided Parathyroid Surgery
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, December 1, 2007; 133(12): 1235 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS