Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-006-9191-9
Annals of Surgical Oncology 14:1374-1380 (2007)
© 2007 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mita, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroda, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mita, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroda, Y.

Original Article

Antitumor Effect of Gemcitabine on Orthotopically Inoculated Human Gallbladder Cancer Cells in Nude Mice

Yoshiyasu Mita, MD1, Tetsuo Ajiki, MD1, Takashi Kamigaki, MD1, Taro Okazaki, MD1, Hiroshige Hori, MD1, Hideki Horiuchi, MD1, Kenro Hirata, MD1, Tsunenori Fujita, MD1, Takahiro Fujimori, MD2 and Yoshikazu Kuroda, MD1

1 Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kobe, Japan
2 Department of Surgical and Molecular Pathology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Tetsuo Ajiki, MD; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku Kobe 650-0017, Japan; E-mail: ajiki{at}med.kobe-u.ac.jp


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: The prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma is poor; therefore, investigating the efficacy of new chemotherapy agents is essential for the treatments for this tumor. Recently, several studies have reported clinical trials using gemcitabine as treatment for advanced gallbladder cancers. However, the antitumor effects of gemcitabine on gallbladder carcinoma have not been examined in in vitro and in vivo model systems.

Methods: We examined the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine in four biliary tract cancer cell lines using the WST-1 assay. In addition, we examined the effect of gemcitabine on gallbladder cancers resulting from orthotopic inoculation of NOZ gallbladder tumor cells into nude mice. One week after transplantation, the mice were randomized into two groups: In Group A, the mice were treated by an intra-peritoneal injection of 0.9% sodium chloride for three weeks after inoculation (control). In Group B, the mice were treated by an intra-peritoneal injection of gemcitabine (125 mg/kg) for three weeks. All mice were sacrificed one week after the end of treatment, and macroscopic and histological findings were evaluated. The expression levels of proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were examined to investigate cellular proliferation activity, and Tunnel assays were performed to determine apoptotic status. Survival duration of the mice after gemcitabine treatment was compared to that of untreated mice.

Results: The gemcitabine sensitivity of the four biliary tract cancer cell lines was similar in a dose dependent manner. In the in vivo models, the Group A mice showed huge tumors of the gallbladder, with liver invasion and lymph node metastases. However, there were no abdominal tumors in the Group B mice, and microscopic gallbladder cancer could only be detected from histological findings. The mean percent of PCNA-positive tumor cells was significantly higher in tumors from mice in Group A (71.9%) compared to those of Group B (34.7%). The mean percent of Tunnel-positive tumor cells was significantly lower in mice from Group A (2.0%) than those from Group B (5.7%). Survival duration was prolonged significantly in the gemcitabine-treated mice relative to untreated mice.

Conclusions: Gemcitabine treatment may inhibit tumor progression and prolong survival in gallbladder cancer by inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis.

Key Words: Gallbladder cancer • Gemcitabine • Survival • Apoptosis • PCNA


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Using a newly-devised model of nude mice inoculated orthotopically with gallbladder cancer, we found that gemcitabine treatment of gallbladder cancer may inhibit tumor progression and prolongs survival by inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis.

Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignancy in the biliary tract.1 Since symptoms from gallbladder cancer manifest themselves late in the disease course, tumors often are detected only at an advanced stage, when patients may not qualify for surgical treatment. For this reason, successful chemotherapy is especially important for cases of advanced gallbladder cancer.

Recently, several reports have described gemcitabine treatment as an effective new regimen for treating gallbladder cancers.27 Gemcitabine is a novel nucleoside analogue that requires phosphorylation to become an active metabolite, gemcitabine triphosphate. Since gemcitabine triphosphate is a competitor of deoxycytidine triphosphate for incorporation into DNA, its presence inhibits DNA synthesis. Gemcitabine activity has been shown to function broadly in a variety of tumors and is currently used to treat non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer in Japan.8,9 Phase II studies in Western countries, as well as in Japan, of single-agent gemcitabine treatment of patients with biliary tract cancer proved efficacious to some degree, with manageable toxicity.27,10

The murine orthotopic model is useful for determining the effectiveness of a chemotherapeutic agent and the most efficient mechanism of administration.11,12 Previously, no animal model for examining the effects of chemotherapeutics on biliary tract cancers existed. However, our group has recently established an orthotopic gallbladder-cancer model useful for drug tests.13,14 In this paper, we examined the effect of gemcitabine in vivo using this gallbladder cancer model. Our results showed that decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis correlated with prolonged survival.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines and Cell Culture Conditions
Four biliary tract carcinoma cell lines, 1 bile duct carcinoma cell line (SK-ChA-1), and 3 gallbladder carcinomas cell lines (NOZ, TGBC-1, MZ-1), were used in this study.1517 Cells were cultured at 37° C in DMEM (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, Sigma, St.Louis, Mo) under a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Comparative Cytotoxicity Assays for Gemcitabine and 5–FU
The cytotoxicity for gemcitabine was assessed in the 4 biliary tract cancer cell lines using a WST-1 Cell Counting Kit (Wako, Osaka, Japan). These cell lines were cultured at a density of 1500–3000 cells/well in 96-well micro-plates with 100 µ l conditioned medium and grown overnight at 37° C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Twenty-four hours later, gemcitabine was dissolved in medium at nine different concentrations (100 µ M-0.256 nM) and added to the plates at a volume of 100 µ l per well. The plates were incubated for 72 h with the chemotherapeutic agent. Then, 10 µ l of the Cell Counting Kit (WST-1, HE-PES, and 1-Methoxy PMS) was added to each well and incubated for another 2 or 3h at 37 ° C. The absorbance was read at 450 nm on a plate-spectrophotometer (BIO-RAD model 450). Absorbance values were expressed as a percentage of untreated controls and an inhibition concentration 50 (IC50) was calculated. The IC50 values represent the means of at least four independent experiments.

Animals and Orthotopic Implantation of Tumor Cells
Two-week-old athymic BALB/c male nude mice obtained from CLEA Japan Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) were used in this study. For orthotopic inoculation, we used an NOZ cell line among the 4 cell lines in the present in vivo study because NOZ cells yield a steady high frequency of tumor formation at the gallbladder and have a high potential of tumor growth and metastasis. NOZ cells were isolated from ascites derived from a 48-year-old female patient with gall-bladder cancer.15 The method used for inducing orthotopic gallbladder cancers in the mice has been described previously.13,14 Briefly, NOZ cells were suspended in 50 µ l of serum-free medium. Nude mice were anesthetized and laparotomy was done. After the cystic duct was ligated on its proximal side with 7–0 Prolene (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ), the fundus of gallbladder was ligated to support. After removing the bile juice, NOZ cells were injected with a 27-gauge Myjectoer syringe (Termo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) into the lumen of the gallbladder. Immediately after injection, ligation was performed distally to the injection site.

Mice were kept at the Animal Care and Use Facilities at Kobe University Graduate School of Medical Sciences under specific pathogen-free conditions. All experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the Kobe University Graduate School of Medical Sciences.

Experimental Conditions for Gemcitabine Therapy for Established Gallbladder Carcinoma
Gemcitabine was supplied by Eli Lilly Japan (Kobe, Japan). Seven days after implantation of NOZ cells into the gallbladder, five mice were killed, and the presence of cancer lesions was determined and confirmed histologically. Mice were randomized into four groups as follows: (a) Group A (n = 10), beginning on the seventh day after implantation of NOZ cells, twice weekly intra-peritoneal injections of 0.9% sodium chloride were continued for three weeks, and animals were then sacrificed on the 28th day after implantation, (b) Group B (n = 10), beginning on the seventh day after implantation of NOZ cells, twice weekly intra-peritoneal injections of 125 mg/kg gemcitabine were continued for three weeks, and animals were then sacrificed on the 28th day after implantation, (c) Group C (n = 10), beginning on the seventh day after implantation of NOZ cells, twice weekly intra-peritoneal injection of 125 mg/kg gemcitabine were continued for three weeks, and the survival duration was measured, and (d) Group D (n = 6), no treatment was administered after implantation of NOZ cells and survival duration was measured.

Histological Studies
When the mice were sacrificed, tumor status, the presence or absence of liver, lung and lymph node metastases, and the presence or absence of peritoneal dissemination were recorded. Histopathology using H & E staining confirmed the identity of the disease.

Immunohistochemical Determination of PCNA and TUNEL (Apoptotic Cells)
For immunohistochemistry procedures, the tumors were fixed in phosphate-buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut in 4-µ m thickness, and stained. Immunohistochemical analysis of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was performed using a labeled streptavidinbiotin technique described previously.18 Anti-PCNA monoclonal antibody PC 10 (DAKO, Carpenteria, CA), which reacts exclusively with nuclei, was used at a dilution of 1:200. The number of PCNA-positive cells was counted in five high-power fields (0.135 mm2 fields at x 200 magnification) selected at random, and the PCNA labeling index for each field was calculated as the percent of PCNA-positive cells (relative to the total). Apoptosis in tumor cells was detected using the terminal de-oxynucleotidyl-transferase-mediated d-UTP-biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay, as described previously.19 In the same manner as PCNA, five fields (0.135 mm2 fields at x 200 magnification) were selected at random, and the apoptotic index of each field was calculated as the percent of TUNEL-positive cells.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using StatView (Abacus Concepts Inc, Berkeley, Calif). Survival curves were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. PCNA-labeling indices and apoptotic indices were assessed using unpaired Student’s t-test. The incidence of metastasis was compared using Fisher’s exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Gemcitabine Sensitivity in Biliary Tract Cancer Cell Lines
Gemcitabine IC50 of the biliary tract cancer cell lines, SK-ChA-1, NOZ, MZ-1 and TGBC-1, were 0.0052 µ M, 0.021 µ M, 0.16 µ M, and 0.037 µ M, respectively. SK-ChA-1 showed the highest sensitivity (5.2 nM). The gemcitabine sensitivity of the four biliary tract cancer cell lines was similar in a dose dependent manner (Fig. 1Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. The inhibitory effect of gemcitabine on 4 biliary tract cancer cell lines.

 
Effectiveness of Gemcitabine in Suppressing the Invasion and Metastasis of NOZ Gallbladder Cancer Cells Inoculated Orthotopically into Nude Mice
Because of the high frequency of orthotopic tumorigenecity and metastatic potential, we used NOZ for in vivo experiment. Table 1Go shows the incidence of gallbladder tumors and metastases with and without gemcitabine administration in mice on the 28th day after orthotopic inoculation of NOZ cells. At the time of sacrifice, macroscopically visible gallbladder tumors were present with direct liver invasion in all Group A mice. Almost all mice in Group A had metastases in multiple organs. In contrast, no tumors were visible in Group B mice (P < 0.01), and although a residue of cancer cells was observed histologically in 70% of Group B mice, no metastases were detected (Fig. 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Incidence of gallbladder tumor and metastases with and without administration of gemcitabine
 

Figure 2
View larger version (202K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG 2. Macroscopic and microscopic findings from the time of sacrifice of Group A and B nude mice that were inoculated orthotopically with NOZ cells. Gallbladder tumors (black arrow with solid line) are clearly evident in Group-A mice (a), but no tumors are observed in the gallbladders (black arrow with solid line) of Group-B mice (b). Histological evidence of cancer cells (black arrow with dotted line) in the gallbladders of Group-A and -B mice.

 
Effectiveness of Gemcitabine for Survival Duration
In Groups C and D, no apparent side effects (including loss of body weight or abnormal behavior) were observed throughout the treatment. At the time of death, all mice in Group D had huge gallbladder tumors, liver invasion, lung metastasis, lymph node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination. The survival duration of mice treated with gemcitabine (Group C) ranged between 47 and 71 days (mean 59.6 days), significantly longer than the survival duration of Group D mice (range 32–38 days, mean 33.6 days) (Fig. 3Go).


Figure 3
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves derived from Group C (thin line with {Delta}) and D (thick line with ({circ}). Mice treated with gemcitabine show a significantly better long-term survival than those with no treatment.

 
PCNA Expression and Labeling Index, and TUNEL Assay and Apoptotic Index
Examples of staining results for PCNA immunohistochemistry and TUNEL assays in mice of Group A and B are shown in Fig. 4Go. The PCNA labeling indices of tumors from mice treated with gemcitabine (Group B) were significantly lower than those from mice treated with sodium chloride (Group A) (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5AGo). The apoptotic indices of tumors from mice treated with gemcitabine (Group B) were significantly higher than those from mice treated with sodium chloride (Group A) (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5BGo).


Figure 4
View larger version (240K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG 4. Immunohistochemical staining for PCNA and Tunnel assays in the gallbladder tumors of Group-A and -B mice. Gallbladder tumors after gemcitabine treatment (Group B) show fewer PCNA-positive cells and more apoptotic cells than untreated tumors.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG 5. Indices of PCNA labeling (A) and apoptosis (B) in gall-bladder tumor cells from mice in Group A or B. Gallbladder tumor cells after gemcitabine treatment (Group B) show a significant decrease in percent PCNA-positive cells as well as a significant increase in percent apoptotic cells. The mean index of PCNA labeling (A) for Group A (71.9 ± 3.5) and Group B (34.7 ± 10.3), and the mean index of apoptosis (B) for Group A (2.0 ± 1.2) and Group B (5.7 ± 2.4) are marked by columns with ± SD error bars.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our studies confirm that the administration of gemcitabine inhibits the growth and metastasis of human gallbladder cancers established in the gall-bladders of athymic nude mice. Using this model, we have shown that inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis can inhibit tumor progression and prolong survival in gallbladder cancers.

Although 5-FU has been widely used in chemotherapy for gallbladder cancer, there is little evidence of its effectiveness. In previous studies, we have shown that gallbladder carcinomas acquire resistance to 5-FU in vivo, as well as in vitro, via increased expression of thymidylate synthase or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.16,20 Similar mechanisms are likely to contribute to the problematic nature of 5-FU-based chemotherapy for advanced gallbladder cancers.

As an alternative to 5-FU, several clinical studies have demonstrated that gemcitabine is effcacious as a single agent, or in combination with other drugs, against biliary tract cancers, including gallbladder cancer. 27,10 Despite these promising results, no experimental study of gemcitabine’s efficacy for biliary tract carcinomas has been reported. Therefore, we conducted in vitro and in vivo gemcitabine experiments examining its effects on NOZ human gallbladder cancer cells implanted into the gallbladders of nude mice.

First, comparative cytotoxicity assays revealed that the inhibitory effect of gemcitabine is a generalized effect for biliary tract cancer cells. Next, we performed an in vivo assay using an orthotopic inoculation model using NOZ cells. Gemcitabine treatment clearly inhibited tumor growth and metastasis in this model.

Several aspects of the orthotopic inoculation model make it useful for testing the effects of gemcitabine on gallbladder cancer. Relative to ectopic (i.e. subcutaneous) inoculation, orthotopic inoculation is likely to provide information not only on the tumorigenicity, invasiveness, and metastatic potential of tumor cells, but also on their responsiveness to drugs. Furthermore, tumors generated by orthotopic inoculation display characteristics that are similar and unique to human gallbladder cancers. This animal model demonstrates high incidences of lymph-node metastasis, liver invasion, and peritoneal metastasis, which is similar to the natural course of human gallbladder cancers.

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analogue that inhibits the synthesis of DNA by interfering with cytidine triphosphate production and by inhibiting the activity of ribonuclease reductase. Gemcitabine is an effective drug approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.21 In the present study, the therapeutic success of gemcitabine (estimated by inhibition of tumor growth and prolonged survival) correlated with decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis in tumor cells. These results were supported by both PCNA and TUNEL histological staining data. Our results correspond well with those of Okino et al. in which pancreatic tumor cells inoculated subcutaneously in nude mice showed decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis after gemcitabine therapy.22 Our results are compatible with the pharmacological mechanism of gemcitabine incorporating into DNA and causing a pause in DNA synthesis that subsequently induces apoptosis.23

However, our results of PCNA and Tunnel staining are not distinctive in the chemotherapeutic effect of gemcitabine. Recently, several reports mentioned that the gemcitabine effect may be influenced by the expression of several enzymes involved in the metabolism of gemcitabine. For example, the expression of deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), which is a rate-limiting enzyme in the salvage of deoxyribonucleosides, is correlated to the survival of pancreatic cancer.24 Cytidine deaminase (CDA) and deoxycytidylate deaminase (DCTD), which are catabolic enzymes of gemcitabine, may be related to the therapeutic response of gemcitabine. 25 Further study will be required to clarify the mechanism of gemcitabine effect for biliary tract cancers by investigating these enzymes.

Studies of the benefit of gemcitabine on the survival of gallbladder cancer patients have yet to be completed. For pancreatic cancers, gemcitabine has demonstrated a survival advantage not only after resection, but also relative to treatment with 5-FU.21,26,27 The data presented here show a significant increase in survival duration resulting from gemcitabine treatment of gallbladder-cancer-model mice. Further studies involving human clinical trials will be necessary to confirm the survival benefit of gemcitabine for gallbladder cancer patients.

In conclusion, our findings indicate that gemcitabine’s mechanism for the inhibition of gallbladder tumor progression and prolonging the survival of orthotopically-inoculated mice may be the inhibition of cell proliferation and the induction of apoptosis. The results of this study, which were derived from a new mouse model of gallbladder cancer, support further clinical testing of gemcitabine for advanced gallbladder cancer in humans.

Received for publication August 10, 2006. Accepted for publication August 10, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Diehl AK. Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer: a synthesis of recent data. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980; 65:1209–14.[Medline]
  2. Gallardo JO, Rubio B, Fodor M, Orlandi L, Yanez M, Gamargo C, Ahumada M. A phase II study of gemcitabine in gallbladder carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2001; 12:1403–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tsavaris N, Kosmas C, Gouveris P, et al. Weekly gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract and gallbladder cancer. Invest New Drugs 2004; 22:193–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Eng C, Ramanathan RK, Wong MK, et al. A Phase II trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tree carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2004; 27:565–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Thongprasert S, Napapan S, Charoentum C, Moonprakan S. Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in inoperable biliary tract carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2005; 16:279–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gelibter A, Malaguti P, Di Cosimo S, et al. Fixed dose-rate gemcitabine infusion as first-line treatment for advanced-stage carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary tree. Cancer 2005; 104:1237–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Park JS, Oh SY, Kim SH, Kwon HC, Kim JS, Jin-Kim H, Kim YH. Single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers: a phase II study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005; 35:68–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ishii H, Furuse J, Kinoshita T, et al. Treatment cost of pancreatic cancer in Japan: analysis of the difference after the introduction of gemcitabine. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005; 35:526–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Matsui K, Hirashima T, Nitta T, et al. A phase I/II study comparing regimen schedules of gemcitabine and docetaxel in Japanese patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005; 35:181–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Okusaka T, Ishii H, Funakoshi A, et al. Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2006; 57:647–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Bruns CJ, Harbison MT, Davis DW, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade with C225 plus gemcitabine results in regression of human pancreatic carcinoma growing orthotopically in nude mice by antiangiogenic mechanisms. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:1936–48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Solorzano CC, Hwang R, Baker CH, et al. Administration of optimal biological dose and schedule of interferon alpha combined with gemcitabine induces apoptosis in tumor-associated endothelial cells and reduces growth of human pancreatic carcinoma implanted orthotopically in nude mice. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9:1858–67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Horiuchi H, Kawamata H, Fujimori T, Kuroda Y. A MEK inhibitor (U0126) prolongs survival in nude mice bearing human gallbladder cancer cells with K-ras mutation: analysis in a novel orthotopic inoculation model. Int J Oncol 2003; 23:957–63.[Medline]
  14. Horiuchi H, Kawamata H, Furihata T, et al. A MEK inhibitor (U0126) markedly inhibits direct liver invasion of orthotopically inoculated human gallbladder cancer cells in nude mice. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2004; 23:599–606.[Medline]
  15. Homma S, Hasumura S, Nagamori S, Kameda H. Establishment and characterization of a human gall bladder carcinoma cell line NOZ. Hum Cell 1988; 1:95–7.[Medline]
  16. Habara K, Ajiki T, Kamigaki T, Nakamura T, Kuroda Y. High expression of thymidylate synthase leads to resistance to 5-fluorouracil in biliary tract carcinoma in vitro. Jpn J Cancer Res 2001; 92:1127–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Knuth A, Gabbert H, Dippold W, et al. Biliary adenocarcinoma characterization of three new human tumor cell lines. J Hepatol 1988; 1:579–96.[CrossRef]
  18. Ajiki T, Kamigaki T, Hasegawa Y, et al. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen, p53, and c-erbB-2 expression in relation to clinicopathological variables and prognosis in cancer of the ampulla of Vater. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48:1266–70.[Medline]
  19. Kakinoki K, Fujino Y, Suzuki Y, et al. Protection against ischemia/reperfusion injury by the cavitary two-layer method in canine small intestinal transplantation with reduction of reactive oxygen species. Surgery 2004; 135:642–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Ajiki T, Hirata K, Okazaki T, et al. Thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expressions in gallbladder cancer. Anticancer Res 2006; 26:1391–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:2403–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Okino H, Maeyama R, Manabe T, Matsuda T, Tanaka M. Trans-tissue, sustained release of gemcitabine from photocured gelatin gel inhibits the growth of heterotopic human pancreatic tumor in nude mice. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9:5786–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hertel LW, Boder GB, Kroin JS, Rinzel SM, Poore GA, Todd GC, Grindey GB. Evaluation of the antitumor activity of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine). Cancer Res 1990; 50:4417–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sebastiani V, Ricci F, Rubio-Viquiera B, et al. Immunohistochemical and genetic evaluation of deoxycytidine kinase in pancreatic cancer: Relationship to molecular mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance and survival. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12:2492–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gilbert JA, Salavaggione OE, Ji Y, et al. Gemcitabine pharmacogenomics: Cytidine deaminase and deoxycytidylate deaminase gene resequencing and functional genomics. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12:1794–803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1200–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Burris H, Storniolo AM. Assessing clinical benefit in the treatment of pancreas cancer: gemcitabine compared to 5-fluorouracil. Eur J Cancer 1997; 33:S18–22.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mita, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroda, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mita, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroda, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS