Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-006-9320-5
Annals of Surgical Oncology 14:1565-1574 (2007)
© 2007 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, E. C.

Original Article

Change of E-Cadherin by Hepatocyte Growth Factor and Effects on the Prognosis of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma

Chul-Ho Kim, MD, PhD1,2, JangHee Kim, MD3, Hison Kahng, MD1,2 and Eun Chang Choi, MD, PhD4

1 Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea
2 Center for Cell Death Regulating Biodrug, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea
3 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea
4 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Eun Chang Choi, MD, PhD; E-mail: ostium{at}ajou.ac.kr


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is known to induce scattering in various epithelial cells, and E-cadherin plays important roles in the maintenance of cell-cell adhesion. However, the mechanisms surrounding these actions are not fully understood. Therefore, we examined how HGF affects the expression and distribution of E-cadherin. In addition, we observed the relationship between prognosis and modulation of E-cadherin by HGF in hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Methods: Tumor tissues from 66 patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were evaluated for the expression of HGF, its receptor (c-Met), and E-cadherin. Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot test were performed on hypopharyngeal cancer tissues. The association and changes of E-cadherin with HGF treatment in a hypopharyngeal cancer cell line were investigated by RT-PCR, Western blot analysis, inhibition assay, immunofluorescence staining, and invasion assay.

Results: E-cadherin expression was found in 87.9% of squamous cell carcinomas; these could be further classified as membranous type (46.9%) or nonmembranous type (53.1%). The expression of HGF in tumors with nonmembranous type E-cadherin expression was far higher than in tumors with membranous expression. Nonmembranous type E-cadherin expression correlated significantly with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and recurrence (P < .05). HGF decreased the expression of E-cadherin and induced the translocation of E-cadherin to the cytoplasm. HGF and E-cadherin neutralizing antibody stimulated dispersion, and HGF significantly enhanced the invasion of hypopharyngeal cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner (P < .05).

Conclusions: These results suggest that HGF can modulate the expression and intracellular localization of E-cadherin in hypopharyngeal cancer cells. In addition, these results indicate that changes in E-cadherin by HGF can affect the prognosis of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Key Words: HGF • E-cadherin • Hypopharyngeal cancer


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Hypopharyngeal carcinoma is characterized by aggressive invasion and metastasis. Therefore, most cases of hypopharyngeal carcinoma are detected in the advanced stage (including invasion to adjacent vital structures, a strong tendency for submucosal spreading, and enlarged ipsilateral or bilateral cervical lymph node deposits). These features combine to make locoregional control of these cancers difficult. The 5-year overall survival rate for all patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma is only 30%; this is essentially unchanged from two decades ago, despite various treatments and intensive research. This is attributed to the rising incidence of distant metastases and intercurrent diseases, as well as second primary malignancies. More effective therapies for hypopharyngeal carcinoma are thus needed. Although various studies have tried to find the mechanism of invasion and metastasis of cancer, the precise molecular mechanisms of invasion and metastasis of head and neck cancers are not fully understood.

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a peptide growth factor well known as a potent stimulator of hepatocyte growth, can promote proliferation, motility, morphogenesis, and angiogenesis in many types of cells, including various tumor cells.14 HGF is primarily produced by mesenchymal cells (such as fibroblasts);5 its biological signal is transmitted from mesenchymal cells to epithelial cells through the HGF receptor,6 a c-met proto-oncogene product.7 Previously, we reported that immunohistochemical staining of hypopharyngeal cancer tissue showed high expression of HGF and c-Met. We also demonstrated that the level of HGF greatly increased in relation to lymph node metastasis and clinical stage of the tumor, whereas c-Met expression rose only according to the clinical stage of the tumor. Moreover, the expression of both mRNA and protein of HGF and c-Met were higher in hypopharyngeal cancer tissue than in normal tissue.8

E-cadherin plays important roles in the maintenance of cell-cell adhesions in epithelial cells.9 Downregulation of E-cadherin in transformed cell lines has been associated with dedifferentiation and acquisition of the ability to invade, suggesting a possible role of this protein as a tumor suppressor.10 Reduced E-cadherin expression and HGF were detected in gastric cancer cells,11 and HGF induces the transfer of E-cadherin from cell-cell contact sites to the cytoplasm in prostate cancer cells.12

In the present study, we first studied the correlation between HGF, c-Met, and E-cadherin in human hypopharyngeal carcinoma tissues from curatively resected specimens, finding a strong correlation between the expression of HGF and the expression and/or localization of E-cadherin. We also showed that HGF can induce the translocation of an E-cadherin in human hypopharyngeal cancer cell lines, resulting in invasion into a collagen membrane.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
Sixty-six patients admitted for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at Ajou University Hospital and Yonsei University Medical Center in Korea were enrolled onto this study between 1994 and 2000. Surgically excised specimens of hypopharyngeal SCC (excluding carcinoma-in-situ and verrucous carcinoma) were used. None of the patients had undergone radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgical excision. The average age at clinical onset was 62 years, with a range of 41–78 years. There were 7 patients at stage I, 2 patients at stage II, 19 patients at stage III, and 38 patients at stage IV (based on the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification system).

Cells and Cell Culture
FaDu cells, a hypopharyngeal cancer cell line, were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Washington, DC) and were cultured in Eagle minimum essential medium containing 25 mM of NaHCO3 (EMEM), 10% fetal bovine serum, glutamine, 1% essential amino acids, vitamins, and streptomycin under 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C.

Expression of HGF, c-Met, and E-Cadherin in Hypopharyngeal Cancer Tissues
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was cut into 5-µm sections. The paraffin was removed, and the sample was rehydrated by serial passage through xylene and a graded series of ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation for 45 minutes in 6% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. The primary antibodies were a human HGF polyclonal antibody used at 50 µg/mL (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), human-met c-28 polyclonal antibody, and monoclonal mouse anti–E-cadherin (HECD-1; Zymed Laboratory, San Francisco, CA) used at .625 µg/mL (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Primary antibody incubations were carried out for 2 hours at 25°C. The sections were thoroughly washed in phosphate-buffered saline, then incubated with the appropriate biotinylated second antibody followed by avidin-peroxidase. Goat and rabbit Vectastain-elite immunoperoxidase kits (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, VT) were purchased for this purpose and were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The chromogenic reaction was carried out with 3–3'-diaminobenzidine in a peroxidase substrate solution for 4 minutes. Hematoxylin was used for nuclear staining. For each experiment, negative controls (which included the omission of either the primary or secondary antibody) were included to examine nonspecific staining. The slides were reviewed by at least two pathologists and scored semiquantitatively by stain intensity and stain area (double scoring system) as follows: -, no staining (score 0); ± , definite but weak staining (score 1); +, moderate staining (score 2); ++, strong staining (score 3); stain < 35% (score 1); 35%–75% (score 2); and stained > 75% of cancer cells (score 3).

Reverse Transcriptase–Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA from fresh hypopharyngeal cancer tissues and FaDu cells was extracted with TriZol (Invitrogen, Groningen, Netherlands). cDNA was prepared with the Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To determine the effects of HGF, cells were treated with HGF (0, 10 ng/mL, 30 ng/mL). The sequences of PCR primers were as follows: HGF-F: 5'-ACA TCG TCA CTT CTG GC-3'; HGF-R: 5'-ATC CAT CCT ATG TTT GTT CG-3'; c-Met-F: 5'-AGT AGC CTG ATT GTG CAT TT-3'; c-Met-R: 5'-TCT TTC ATG ATG CCC TC-3'; E-cadherin–F: 5'-ACA TCG TCA CTT CTG GC-3'; E-cadherin–R: 5'ATC CAT CCT ATG TTT GTT CG-3'. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels and were detected under ultraviolet light (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

Western Blot Test
Fresh hypopharyngeal cancer tissues were prepared, and exponentially growing cells in 10-cm2 dishes were rinsed several times with phosphate-buffered saline and fed with EMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and human recombinant HGF (0, 10 ng/mL, 30 ng/mL) (R&D Systems). The cells were cultured for 3 days in a humidified CO2 incubator. Control cells were similarly washed and cultured in medium without HGF. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and extracted with EBC buffer (120 mmol/L of NaCl, .5% NP-40, 40 mmol/L of Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mmol/L of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) with protease inhibitors (100 µg/mL of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1 µg/mL of leupeptin). The extracts were centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 minutes; the supernatants were used for Western blot analyses. Protein content was measured with a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). Twenty micrograms of protein was resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis transferred to nitrocellulose filters (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL), and incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-human c-Met antibodies, anti-human HGF antibodies, or anti-human E-cadherin antibodies. After washing, the filters were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody (Amersham) or donkey anti-mouse antibody (Amersham) and were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham).

Effect of HGF on Colony Dispersion
FaDu cells were subcultured and maintained in growth medium until colonies > 16 cells were established. Cultures were then deprived of growth factors and serum for 48 hours before treatment with HGF (0, 10 ng/mL, 30 ng/mL) at the times and conducted in cells pretreated for 2 hours with mitomycin C (8 µg/mL). To confirm the effect of HGF, cells were treated with HGF (0, 10 ng/mL, 30 ng/mL) and antihuman E-cadherin mouse monoclonal antibody (3 µg/mL). Colony dispersion was documented by photography at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours.

Immunofluorescence Staining
Cells grown on glass slides were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde containing 10 mM of CaCl2 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) at room temperature for 15 minutes. The fixed cells were treated with .2% Triton X-100 in TBS for 15 minutes and washed with TBS three times. After soaking with TBS containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (10% FCS/TBS) for 1 hour, the samples were incubated overnight with primary antibody in 10% FCS/TBS. The slides were then washed with TBS three times, followed by incubation with secondary antibody in 10% FCS/TBS for 1 hour. After incubation, the cells were washed with TBS three times, embedded in TBS containing 50% glycerol, and analyzed with a Zeiss confocal laser scanning microscope.

Invasion Assay
Transwell chambers (Costar) were used to verify the degree of invasiveness depending on the administration of HGF. First, type I collagen (6 µg per filter) melted in EMEM 100 µL was poured into the upper part of a polyethylene filter (8 µm pore size); coating was carried out in a laminar flow hood for one night. A total of 500 µL of .5% fetal bovine serum medium was put into the lower part of each well, and the wells were adjusted to HGF densities of 0, 10, and 30 ng/µL. After preprocessing with mitomycin C (8 µg/mL) for 30 minutes, 105 cells (in 100 µL of growth medium) were attached to the top of the filter of the upper well. After this chamber was cultivated in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 48 hours, the filter of the upper well was removed and the cells passed through the pore. The attached cells on the lower part were dyed with hematoxylin and counted with a light microscope.

Statistical Analysis
Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance (for the invasion assay) were used for statistical analyses of the data. Patient survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistically significant differences in survival were identified by the log rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. All statistical analyses were conducted by SPSS 10.0 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL). A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Expression of HGF, c-Met, and E-Cadherin and in Human Hypopharyngeal Cancer Tissue
HGF overexpression was observed in 74.5% of hypopharyngeal cancer tissues. In most of the specimens, HGF expression was primarily seen in the stromal cells around the cancer cells. In most cases, the cytoplasm of the stromal cells was diffusely and darkly stained; in some cases, the cell membrane was also stained (Fig. 1AGo). There was a statistically significant correlation between HGF expression and lymph node metastasis and clinical stage (data not shown). Compared with HGF, c-Met expression was not observed in stromal cells, but was primarily in carcinoma cells and was occasionally (and weakly) in normal cells. In most of the specimens, c-Met was expressed strongly and diffusely in the cytoplasm of carcinoma cells (Fig. 1BGo). There was a statistically significant correlation between the expression of c-Met and lymph node metastasis (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (230K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Paraffin-embedded sections of hypopharyngeal carcinomas immunostained for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), c-Met, and E-cadherin. (A) HGF staining was primarily observed in stromal tissue around cancer cells, but was seen occasionally in cancer cells and basal layer of normal cells (original magnification, x 200). (B) c-Met expression was seen in cytoplasm of cancer cells both diffusely and strongly. (C) Strong linear intercellular immunoreactivity of E-cadherin (membranous type) was detected in well-differentiated squamous carcinoma. (D) Intracytoplasmic expression of E-cadherin (nonmembranous type) was detected in poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma.

 
E-cadherin expression was found in 87.9% of hypopharyngeal cancer tissues, which could be further classified as membranous type (46.9%) (Fig. 1CGo) or nonmembranous type (53.1%) (Fig. 1DGo). Membranous expression was defined as the localization of E-cadherin solely in the cell membrane; nonmembranous expression was defined as E-cadherin in the cytoplasm or the lack of expression of the protein. Membranous expression of E-cadherin was frequently found in early stage tumors, whereas non-membranous expression was frequently found in advanced stage tumors. Nonmembranous type E-cadherin expression correlated significantly with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and recurrence (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Correlation between the expression pattern of E-cadherin and clinicopathologic factors
 
Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of E-cadherin was performed on three fresh specimens of normal hypopharyngeal mucosa and carcinomas. There was a marked decrease in hypopharyngeal carcinomas compared with normal hypopharyngeal mucosa (Fig. 2Go). Western blot test was also performed on the three specimens; E-cadherin was more strongly expressed in normal tissues than in carcinomas (Fig. 2Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Expression of E-cadherin in human pharyngeal cancer tissues. (A) In reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction analysis of E-cadherin expression in normal hypopharyngeal mucosa (N) and hypopharyngeal cancer (C), lower level of expression of E-cadherin mRNA was detected in hypopharyngeal cancer tissues. (B) Western blot test demonstrated that E-cadherin was weakly expressed in carcinomas compared with normal tissues.

 
HGF expression was far higher in advanced cases in terms of large tumor and nodal metastasis. To address the possible correlation between the expression of HGF and the localization of E-cadherin, we compared the intracellular localization of E-cadherin and the expression of HGF in hypopharyngeal cancer tissues. Indeed, HGF expression was far higher in the group with nonmembranous expression of E-cadherin compared with the group with membranous expression (Fig. 3AGo). Furthermore, survival was much worse in patients with the nonmembranous type of E-cadherin than in those with the membranous type, suggesting the importance of this molecule in hypopharyngeal cancer progression (Fig. 3BGo). Survival was associated with the tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, recurrence, and the nonmembranous expression of E-cadherin by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, distant metastasis (hazard ratio, 10.938; 95% confidence interval, 4.45–26.885, P = .001) and recurrence (hazard ratio, 19.598; 95% confidence interval, 6.835–56.195, P = .000) were independently associated with survival (Table 2Go).


Figure 3
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. (A) Correlation between location of E-cadherin and expression of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in hypopharyngeal carcinoma tissue. Significant differences in expression of HGF were observed between membranous and nonmembranous type of E-cadherin. Expression of HGF was significantly higher in group nonmembranous expression of E-cadherin compared with group with membranous expression (P < .05). (B) Five-year survival of 66 patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma according to E-cadherin expression. Survival was significantly worse in patients with nonmembranous type of E-cadherin compared with membranous type (P = .0006).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors
 
Effect of HGF and Anti–E-Cadherin Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody on Colony Dispersion
In the control, there was no marked colony dispersion of the FaDu cells. In the inhibition assay that used anti-E–neutralizing monoclonal antibody, the FaDu cells dissociated 24 hours after treatment (Fig. 4Go); this behavior was similar to the scattering with HGF treatment. After 6 hours, the formation of actin microspikes (filopodia) and membrane ruffling (lamellipodia) were observed, and cell shape changed to the spindlelike features seen in the HGF treated group (Fig. 4Go). This result suggests that E-cadherin may be associated with scattering. Although we did not measure the objective scattering effect according to the concentration of HGF, 30 ng/mL seemed to produce a more potent scattering effect than 10 ng/mL 24 hours after HGF stimulation (data not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Scatter activity of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and inhibition assay using anti–E-cadherin neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb). FaDu cells were cultured (A) without treatment (control), (B) with anti–E-cadherin neutralizing mAb, or (C) HGF for 24 hours (original magnification, x 150). In inhibition assay using anti-E–neutralizing mAb, FaDu cells dissociated 24 hours after treatment; this behavior was similar to scattering observed with HGF treatment.

 
Effect of HGF on the Expression of E-cadherin on Human Hypopharyngeal Cancer Cells
By RT-PCR and Western blot test, E-cadherin was observed in FaDu cells. Expression decreased within 24 hours of HGF treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5Go).


Figure 5
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Effect of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) on expression of E-cadherin in FaDu. In reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction analysis (A) and Western blot test (B) of E-cadherin expression by HGF, exogenous HGF induced downregulation of E-cadherin in membrane in dose-dependent manner. Graph illustrates relative amounts of E-cadherin according to concentration of HGF.

 
Effect of HGF on the Distribution of E-Cadherin
Immunofluorescent staining of E-cadherin showed localization primarily at cell-cell adhesion sites in FaDu cells (Fig. 6Go). However, in the scattered cells after stimulation with HGF, E-cadherin staining at the cell surface membrane decreased and accumulated in the cytoplasm in dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6Go). This suggests a marked decrease in membrane-associated E-cadherin and an increase in cytosolic E-cadherin after HGF treatment. These results suggest that HGF induces the redistribution of E-cadherin from a functional to a nonfunctional compartment in the cell, which was accompanied by scattering and morphologic changes in hypopharyngeal cancer cells.


Figure 6
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Effect of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) on distribution of E-cadherin. FaDu cells were cultured without (a) or with HGF 10 ng/mL (b) or 30 ng/mL (c). These cells were stained with anti–E-cadherin monoclonal antibody, visualized with fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated anti-mouse IgG goat antibody, and analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. In scattered cells after stimulation with HGF, E-cadherin staining at cell surface membrane decreased and accumulated in cytoplasm in a dose-dependent manner.

 
Effect of HGF on Cell Invasion
The effect of HGF on FaDu cell invasion was evaluated by a type 1 collagen-coated Transwell invasion assay. HGF at 10 ng/mL led to a mean 4 ± 1-fold increase in cell invasion (P < .05 vs. control), and HGF at 30 ng/mL led to a mean 7 ± 2.5-fold increase in cell invasion (P < .05 vs. control) (Fig. 7Go). HGF 30 ng/mL led to a mean 1.7 ± .5-fold increase in cell invasion (P < .05 vs. HGF 10 ng/mL). Less functional E-cadherin as a result of HGF treatment implies less cell-cell adhesion, which consequently leads to enhanced cell migration and invasion.


Figure 7
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 7. Invasion assay of FaDu cells using Transwell chamber after treatment with hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). FaDu cells seeded on upper membrane in presence (10 or 30 ng/mL) or absence of recombinant HGF in lower compartment. After 48-hour incubation, plugged cells in 8-µm pore or cells attached to undersurface or membrane were counted. Bars show SD of triplicate samples. Data are representative of three separate experiments with similar results. HGF significantly promoted invasion ability of FaDu cells in dose-dependent manner. *P < .05 vs. untreated cells. ** P < .05 vs. cells treated with 10 ng/mL.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tumor cell migration and invasion are critical steps in tumor progression and metastasis. Half of all cancer deaths are either directly or indirectly due to local invasion, either with or without involvement of regional lymph nodes. Accordingly, transition from the noninvasive to the invasive state is the crucial event in cancer development, and reversion of this phenomenon is most important target in cancer therapy. Therefore, an understanding of the mediators of the critical steps in the progression of cancer is essential for the development of targeted therapies for cancer.

Cell-cell adhesion plays an important role in the maintenance of cell and tissue integrity. Intercellular adhesion junctions are composed of E-cadherin and its associated intracellular catenins.13,14 Changes in cell adhesion molecules are known to play an important role in facilitating the dissemination of tumor cells from the primary site and the establishment of metastases. The expression levels of the components of the E-cadherin cell adhesion complex have been studied in a variety of human carcinomas in an attempt to correlate changes with advanced disease state and tumor progression. By use of immunohistochemical methods, E-cadherin levels have been associated with differentiation in SCCs;15 that is, well-differentiated tumors express higher levels of E-cadherin, whereas poorly differentiated tumors have far lower levels of expression.15 E-cadherin expression has also been examined in relation to clinical outcome in patients with SCCs of the head and neck (SCCHN).16 Although E-cadherin expression was not related to tumor size or stage, patients with increased tumor levels of E-cadherin seemed to have a more favorable survival rate. This finding was corroborated in a study in which patients with strong E-cadherin staining in tumors had a 5-year survival rate of 85%, compared with a 53% survival rate for those with weaker staining.17 Decreased levels of E-cadherin have also been associated with a metastatic phenotype in SCCHN cell lines.18 This relationship has also been shown in tumor specimens,19 indicating that loss of E-cadherin may be an important step in the development of metastasis in SCCHN.

On the other hand, research on the role of HGF in the invasion of tumor cells and metastasis has been reported in cases of gastric cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, leukemia, and breast cancer.2,2022 As a result, HGF is known to be secreted from the fibroblasts around the tumor, helping cancer cells invade the surrounding stroma. Such invasion and migration of cancer cells may be a basis of lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis. Of the cancers of the head and neck, hypopharyngeal carcinoma is known to have a very high invasion and metastasis rate. Because HGF is known to play a crucial role in the advancement of the tumor, research on HGF may support the understanding of the oncologic characteristics of hypopharyngeal cancer. However, HGF in cancer of the hypopharynx has yet to be studied. Ours is the first study of the correlation between HGF and E-cadherin in human hypopharyngeal carcinoma tissues and cell line.

In this study, we found statistically significant inverse correlations between the expression of HGF and membranous expression of E-cadherin in immunohistochemical methods. Also, the prognosis was poor in patients with higher levels of HGF or nonmembranous expression of E-cadherin. In a preliminary experiment, we compared intratumoral HGF levels with E-cadherin localization in hypopharyngeal cancer. Although the number of samples examined was limited (n = 14), the tissue level of HGF was increased in advanced cases in terms of nodal and distant metastasis. Consequently, intratumoral HGF was increased in cases with higher stage. Indeed, the intratumoral HGF level was higher in the group with nonmembranous expression of E-cadherin compared with the group with membranous expression (data not shown). c-Met activation is known to induce cell migration and invasion, both of which are essential in tumor progression. Interestingly, loss of E-cadherin was found in many hypopharyngeal cancers, which suggests that tumor progression also might result from the downregulation of E-cadherin. Our study suggests that HGF has an effect on the E-cadherin–associated adhesion system and downregulates functional E-cadherin, preventing cell dissociation. Morphologic changes of cells were observed even at 6 hours after HGF treatment (data not shown), and the capability to invade a type I collagen-coated Transwell chamber was evident 2 days after treatment with HGF, strengthening the relationship between morphologic changes and the enhancement of invasion. Our data also suggest that HGF may be a regulator of the progression by E-cadherin–mediated cell-cell adhesion in some hypopharyngeal cancers. Although additional studies are necessary to confirm our hypothesis, it is possible that the inhibition of HGF function helps maintain the integrity of tumor cell colonies and has the benefit of preventing progression to distant metastases in some hypopharyngeal cancers.

We did not study the detailed mechanism of the inactivation of the cadherin/catenin complex induced by HGF. However, Shibamoto et al.23 reported that HGF phosphorylates ß-catenin and modulates the cell-cell adhesion mediated by the E-cadherin–catenin system. Hiscox and Jiang24 reported that HGF enhances tyrosine phosphorylation of ß-catenin and results in the dissociation of ß-catenin from E-cadherin. Although we did not investigate ß-catenin phosphorylation, it is possible that E-cadherin separates from catenins with HGF stimulation, and that only E-cadherin is endocytosed and degraded in FaDu cells. Supporting these notions are studies in prostate cancer cells that demonstrate that the expression of {alpha}- and ß-catenin does not change with HGF stimulation. Instead, only E-cadherin expression was decreased, and this was mediated by endocytosis to the cytoplasm, as suggested by Western blot and immunofluorescence studies.12,25 The effects of HGF on E-cadherin–mediated cell-cell adhesion were also observed in melanoma cells and prostate cancer cells.12,25 Li et al.25 reported that prolonged HGF stimulation causes downregulation of E-cadherin, which is MAPK and PI3K dependent. In melanoma cells, activation of Snail expression plays an important role in downregulation of E-cadherin.26 The role of Snail/Slug in HGF-induced downregulation of E-cadherin and desmoglein is now under further investigation. Grotegut et al.27 reported that Snail upregulation by HGF is mediated via the MAPK/Egr-1 signaling pathway and that both Snail and Egr-1 play a critical role in HGF-induced cell scattering, migration, and invasion.

In conclusion, our study showed that HGF can modulate the expression and intracellular localization of E-cadherin in hypopharyngeal cancer cells, and HGF-associated changes in E-cadherin can effect on the prognosis of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Supported in part by CCRB through the "GRRC" Project of Gyeonggi Provincial Government, Republic of Korea.

Received for publication September 30, 2006. Accepted for publication November 22, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Barros EJ, Santos OF, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T, Nigam SK. Differential tubulogenic and branching morphogenetic activities of growth factors: implications for epithelial tissue development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92:4412–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Montesano R, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T, Orci L. Identification of a fibroblast-derived epithelial morphogen as hepatocyte growth factor. Cell 1991; 67:901–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Nakamura T, Nishizawa T, Hagiya M, et al. Molecular cloning and expression of human hepatocyte growth factor. Nature 1989; 342:440–3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Zarnegar R, Michalopoulos GK. The many faces of hepatocyte growth factor: from hepatopoiesis to hematopoiesis. J Cell Biol 1995; 129:1177–80.[Free Full Text]
  5. Yoshinaga Y, Matsuno Y, Fujita S, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor in human cancerous and inflammatory lesions of various organs. Jpn J Cancer Res 1993; 84:1150–8.[CrossRef]
  6. Bottaro DP, Rubin JS, Faletto DL, et al. Identification of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor as the c-met proto-oncogene product. Science 1991; 251:802–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Di Renzo MF, Poulsom R, Olivero M, Comoglio PM, Lemoine NR. Expression of the Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor in human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 1995; 55:1129–38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kim CH, Moon SK, Bae JH, et al. Expression of hepatocyte growth factor and c-Met in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol 2006; 126:88–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Takeichi M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 1991; 251:1451–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fabre M, de Garcia Herreros A. Phorbol ester–induced scattering of HT-29 human intestinal cancer cells is associated with down-modulation of E-cadherin. J Cell Sci 1993; 106(pt 2):513–21.[Abstract]
  11. Tannapfel A, Yasui W, Yokozaki H, Wittekind C, Tahara E. Effect of hepatocyte growth factor on the expression of E- and P-cadherin in gastric carcinoma cell lines. Virchows Arch 1994; 425:139–44.[Medline]
  12. Miura H, Nishimura K, Tsujimura A, et al. Effects of hepatocyte growth factor on E-cadherin–mediated cell-cell adhesion in DU145 prostate cancer cells. Urology 2001; 58:1064–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hinck L, Nathke IS, Papkoff J, Nelson WJ. Dynamics of cadherin/catenin complex formation: novel protein interactions and pathways of complex assembly. J Cell Biol 1994; 125:1327–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tsukita S, Tsukita S, Nagafuchi A, Yonemura S. Molecular linkage between cadherins and actin filaments in cell-cell adherens junctions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1992; 4:834–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Wu H, Lotan R, Menter D, Lippman SM, Xu XC. Expression of E-cadherin is associated with squamous differentiation in squamous cell carcinomas. Anticancer Res 2000; 20:1385–90.[Medline]
  16. Mattijssen V, Peters HM, Schalkwijk L, et al. E-cadherin expression in head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma is associated with clinical outcome. Int J Cancer 1993; 55:580–5.[Medline]
  17. Chow V, Yuen AP, Lam KY, Tsao GS, Ho WK, Wei WI. A comparative study of the clinicopathological significance of E-cadherin and catenins (alpha, beta, gamma) expression in the surgical management of oral tongue carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2001; 127:59–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Nakayama S, Sasaki A, Mese H, Alcalde RE, Matsumura T. Establishment of high and low metastasis cell lines derived from a human tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Invasion Metastasis 1998; 18:219–28.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Schipper JH, Unger A, Jahnke K. E-cadherin as a functional marker of the differentiation and invasiveness of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1994; 19:381–4.[Medline]
  20. Boros P, Miller CM. Hepatocyte growth factor: a multifunctional cytokine. Lancet 1995; 345:293–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Grant DS, Kleinman HK, Goldberg ID, et al. Scatter factor induces blood vessel formation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90:1937–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Wang Y, Selden AC, Morgan N, Stamp GW, Hodgson HJ. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor expression in human mammary epithelium. Am J Pathol 1994; 144:675–82.[Abstract]
  23. Shibamoto S, Hayakawa M, Takeuchi K, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-catenin and plakoglobin enhanced by hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor in human carcinoma cells. Cell Adhes Commun 1994; 1:295–305.[Medline]
  24. Hiscox S, Jiang WG. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor disrupts epithelial tumour cell-cell adhesion: involvement of beta-catenin. Anticancer Res 1999; 19:509–17.[Medline]
  25. Li G, Schaider H, Satyamoorthy K, Hanakawa Y, Hashimoto K, Herlyn M. Downregulation of E-cadherin and desmoglein 1 by autocrine hepatocyte growth factor during melanoma development. Oncogene 2001; 20:8125–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Poser I, Dominguez D, de Herreros AG, Varnai A, Buettner R, Bosserhoff AK. Loss of E-cadherin expression in melanoma cells involves up-regulation of the transcriptional repressor Snail. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:24661–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Grotegut S, von Schweinitz D, Christofori G, Lehembre F. Hepatocyte growth factor induces cell scattering through MAPK/Egr-1–mediated upregulation of Snail. EMBO J 2006; 25:3534–45.[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, E. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS