Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krouse, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Leong, S. P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krouse, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Leong, S. P. L.
Annals of Surgical Oncology 8:268-269 (2001)
© 2001 Society of Surgical Oncology


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Blue Dye for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Not Too Sensitive, but Too Hypersensitive?

Robert S. Krouse, M.D. and Roderich E. Schwarz, M.D.

Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California.

Blue Dye for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Not Too Sensitive, but Too Hypersensitive?

In the June issue of the Annals of Surgical Oncology, Leong and colleagues report three patients with malignant melanoma in whom administration of isosulfan blue (Lymphazurin) for the intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping resulted in anaphylactic complications.1 We also have recently encountered a severe, albeit not anaphylactic, hypersensitivity reaction after isosulfan blue injection in a 63 year-old-woman with a 2.55 mm, Clark’s Level IV nonulcerated malignant melanoma of the posterior leg who underwent wide re-excision and a SLN biopsy. The patient, devoid of known allergies, had received 1 mCi of unfiltered 99mTc sulfur colloid, injected preoperatively around the previous excision site, and the resulting lymphoscintigram identified an inguinal sentinel lymph node. Four milliliters of 1% isosulfan blue were injected intradermally prior to the skin preparation at the scar site, which was then widely excised with 2 centimeter margins. During primary closure, it was noted that the posterior leg and thigh rapidly developed multiple raised erythematous areas (Fig. 1). Diphenhydramine (Benadryl, 25 mg) was given intravenously, but the urticaria progressed onto the torso. Subsequently, 100 mg of hydrocortisone were administered intravenously, and the urticaria slowly faded. There was no sign of anaphylaxis or hemodynamic manifestations. Under guidance of a gamma probe, a small incision was made in the inguinal area, and three blue channels were seen leading to a single "hot" SLN. The node was not harboring tumor cells on histopathologic evaluation. The patient was admitted overnight for observation. She had no further signs of allergic response and was discharged the following morning.



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1 Multiple raised erythematous areas on patient’s posterior leg and thigh after administration of isosulfan blue.

 
Although the complications ascribed to isosulfan blue injection seem to be rare, the question seems valid, whether a combined "hot" and "blue" technique to identify SLNs in malignant melanoma should be routinely used. Generally, the use of radiolabeled sulfur colloid has proven superior to the use of blue dye alone to accurately identify the SLN status.2,3 Although most larger studies use both techniques in combination, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy followed by intraoperative gamma probe detection of radiolabeled lymph nodes enhances the accuracy of SLN identification over the blue dye technique by 4% to 16%.410 Nearly always, blue nodes are successfully radiolabeled.11 In addition, if the preoperative lymphoscintigram demonstrates a SLN, subsequent gamma probe-directed SLN biopsy is predictably highly successful.12 Finally, the blue dye technique seems to have a steeper learning curve, with even less acceptable results in early clinical experiences or smaller centers.13 All these results indicate a limited benefit to the routine use of intraoperative blue dye injection when a radiolabeled SLN technique is to be performed, combined with a risk for rare, but serious and potentially life threatening, hypersensitivity reactions, as in our experience or those cases described and discussed by Leong et al.1,14 We therefore continue the routine use of radiolabeled sulfur colloid for cutaneous melanoma SLN mapping in our practice, and recommend considering the restriction of the injection of vital blue dye to situations in which the preoperative lymphoscintigram or the transcutaneous application of the gamma probe immediately prior to the operation yield ambiguous or negative results.

REFERENCES

  1. Leong SPL, Donegan E, Heffernon W, Dean S, Katz JA. Adverse reactions to isosulfan blue during selective sentinel lymph node dissection in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 361–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Morton DL, Chan AD. Current status of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for melanoma: is it standard of care? J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 214–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Pijpers R, Borgstein PJ, Teule GJ, Meijer S. Vital dye and radiolabeled colloids–complement or alternative? Recent Results Cancer Res 2000; 157: 130–7.[Medline]
  4. Albertini JJ, Cruse CW, Rapaport D, et al. Intraoperative radio-lympho-scintigraphy improves sentinel lymph node identification for patients with melanoma. Ann. Surg 1996; 223: 217–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Kapteijn BA, Nieweg OE, Liem I, et al. Localizing the sentinel node in cutaneous melanoma: gamma probe detection versus blue dye. Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4: 156–60.[Abstract]
  6. Bartolomei M, Testori A, Chinol M, et al. Sentinel node localization in cutaneous melanoma: lymphoscintigraphy with colloids and antibody fragments versus blue dye mapping. Eur J Nucl Med 1998; 25: 1489–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Bedrosian I, Scheff AM, Mick R, et al. 99mTc-human serum albumin: an effective radiotracer for identifying sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma [see comments] J Nucl Med 1999; 40: 1143–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Essner R, et al. Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: a multicenter trial. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 453–63; discussion, 463–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Cascinelli N, Belli F, Santinami M, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma: the WHO Melanoma Program experience Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 469–74.[Abstract]
  10. Gennari R, Bartolomei M, Testori A, et al. Sentinel node localization in primary melanoma: preoperative dynamic lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative gamma probe, and vital dye guidance, Surgery 2000; 127: 19–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Krag DN, Meijer SJ, Weaver DL, et al. Minimal-access surgery for staging of malignant melanoma. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 654–8; discussion, 659–60.[Abstract]
  12. Wong JH, Steinemann S, Yonehara C, Coel MN, Ko PJ, Tonaki K, Tauchi P. Sentinel node staging for cutaneous melanoma in a university-affiliated community care setting. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 450–5.[Abstract]
  13. Habib FA, Lodish ME, Mittal VK, Young SC. Sentinel lymph node dissection for primary cutaneous melanoma: a community hospital’s initial experience. Am Surg 2000; 66: 291–5.[Medline]
  14. Longnecker SM, Guzzardo MM, Van Voris LP. Life-threatening anaphylaxis following subcutaneous administration of isosulfan blue 1%. Clin Pharm 1985; 4: 219–21[Medline]

 

Response

Stanley P. L. Leong, MD

Professor of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.

Reply to Letter to the Editor From Robert S. Krouse and Roderich E. Schwarz

Thank you for referring to me the letter by Drs Krouse and Schwarz entitled "Blue Dye for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Not Too Sensitive, but Too Hypersensitive?" The utility of the routine use of blue dye for intraoperative mapping is probably not needed when a radiotracer sentinel lymph node technique is to be performed. In the literature, it has been well established that a combination of two techniques using radiotracer and blue dye are superior to blue dye alone.13 The issue is whether both techniques recognize the same sentinel lymph node which needs to be determined. For melanoma with respect to multiple anatomical sites, it is imperative to have a preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. Because preoperative lymphoscintigraphy has been established as a standard for detection of sentinel lymph nodes in the appropriate basins, and that almost 100% of the time the sentinel lymph node can be harvested when it is identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, it is somewhat redundant to use a second tracer to further enhance the visualization of the sentinel lymph node. In fact, without the radiotracer, it takes a much longer time and a wider dissection area in order to track down the sentinel lymphatics to a blue lymph node. Occasionally, even with the visualization of blue lymphatic channels, it may not lead to a blue lymph node. Likewise, blue lymphatics may not be seen despite the fact that there is a blue lymph node. On the other hand, when a preoperative lymphoscintigraphy identifies the sentinel lymph node, it can be harvested almost 100% of the time without the blue dye. Therefore, in general for melanoma cases, the addition of blue dye is certainly not necessary. On the other hand, in cases of breast cancer when preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not able to localize the sentinel lymph node, injection of blue dye will definitely help because the sentinel lymph node is usually found in the axillary region. If the sentinel lymph node is identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, the harvesting rate of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer is also significantly enhanced.4

Furthermore, we have recently analyzed our database in which both the blue dye and radiotracer were used for a group of 326 melanoma patients. Blue dye alone would miss 27.5% of the sentinel lymph node being positive for melanoma. Furthermore, if only the most radioactive sentinel lymph node were resected within each nodal basin, a failure rate of 18.2% would be encountered. We conclude that radiotracer mapping is a superior method over blue dye staining for identifying sentinel lymph nodes with micrometastasis.

Krouse and Schwarz have eloquently stated all the reasons for the use of blue dye to be limited and not of necessity if indeed a radiotracer is being used. In view of the potential allergic and/or anaphylactic reactions to blue dye and other side effects such as blue coloration of the skin and blue urine lasting for over several days, use of blue dye should be limited.5 Furthermore, the extra cost of the blue dye and the injection time in the operating room can also be eliminated.

In summary, based on the scientific evidence available in the literature and the potential severe anaphylactic reactions, I agree with the authors that blue dye should only be used in a restrictive fashion when there is doubt about the identification of the sentinel lymph node by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. Certainly, surgeons who continue to use the blue dye should be aware of potential anaphylactic reactions and appropriate treatment for such reactions.

REFERENCES

  1. Albertini JJ, Cruse CW, Rapaport D, et al. Intraoperative radio-lympho-scintigraphy improves sentinel lymph node identification for patients with melanoma. Ann Surg 1996; 223: 217–24.
  2. Kapteijn BA, Nieweg OE, Liem I, et al. Localizing the sentinel node in cutaneous melanoma: gamma probe detection versus blue dye. Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4: 156–60.
  3. Leong SPL, Steinmetz I, Habib FA, et al. Optimal selective sentinel lymph node dissection in primary malignant melanoma. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 666–73.[Abstract]
  4. Leong SPL, Morita ET, Treseler PA, Wong JH. Multidisciplinary approach to selective sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer. Breast Can 2000; 7: 105–13.
  5. Leong SPL, Donegan E, Heffernon W, et al. Adverse reactions to isosulfan blue during selective sentinel lymph node dissection in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 361–6.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. L. Montgomery, A. C. Thorne, K. J. Van Zee, J. Fey, A. S. Heerdt, M. Gemignani, E. Port, J. Petrek, H. S. Cody III, and P. I. Borgen
Isosulfan Blue Dye Reactions During Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Breast Cancer
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2002; 95(2): 385 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krouse, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Leong, S. P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krouse, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Leong, S. P. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS