| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Richard Essner, MD, John Wayne Cancer Institute, 2200 Santa Monica Blvd., Santa Monica, CA 90404; Fax: 310-449-5259; E-mail: essner{at}jwci.org
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: A prospectively acquired database identified patients treated for melanoma metastatic to the liver, pancreas, spleen, adrenal glands, or a combination of these from 1971 to 2000. The primary intervention was complete or incomplete surgical resection of intra-abdominal solid-organ metastases, and the main outcome measure was postoperative overall survival (OS). Disease-free survival (DFS) was a secondary outcome measure.
Results: Sixty patients underwent adrenalectomy, hepatectomy, splenectomy, or pancreatectomy. Median OS was significantly improved after complete versus incomplete resections, but median OS after complete resection was not significantly different for single-site versus synchronous multisite metastases. The 5-year survival in the group after complete resection was 24%, whereas in the incomplete resection group, there were no 5-year survivors. Median DFS after complete resection was 15 months. Of note, the 2-year DFS after complete resection was 53% for synchronous multi-site metastases versus 26% for single-site metastases.
Conclusions: In highly selected patients with melanoma metastatic to intra-abdominal solid organs, aggressive attempts at complete surgical resection may improve OS. It is important that the number of metastatic sites does not seem to affect the OS after complete resection.
Key Words: Metastatic melanoma Hepatic Spleen Adrenal gland Surgical resection
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A highly selected group of patients with distant melanoma metastases are candidates for either potentially curative (complete) or palliative (incomplete) resections of their disease. Multiple retrospective studies from our group and others have demonstrated a survival advantage for patients after complete resection of melanoma metastatic to the lung, hollow viscus gastrointestinal tract, soft tissues, or a combination of these.1,415 However, the appropriateness of surgical management of intra-abdominal solid organ melanoma metastases remains controversial. Perhaps even more controversial is the resection of multiple organ-site disease.
Because of the dearth of effective systemic treatment for distant melanoma metastases, our group has taken an aggressive surgical approach in a highly selected subgroup of these patients with operable disease. We hypothesized that complete resection of intra-abdominal solid organ melanoma metastases improves survival. In this report, we describe the experience at the John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI) in the operative treatment of patients with melanoma metastatic to the intra-abdominal solid organs (liver, spleen, pancreas, and adrenals). Our experience with adrenal16 and hepatic17 metastases has been previously reported.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because this retrospective study included patients treated by multiple surgeons, there were no set strict patient selection criteria. Patients were selected for operative treatment by the managing surgeons use of his judgment. In general, patients were approached with intent to perform R0 resections whenever possible, as deemed feasible by preoperative examinations. Multiple organ-site disease was usually resected at one operative setting, although a small number of patients required two separate operations to achieve a complete resection of multiple-site disease. Those patients who underwent palliative incomplete resections included those whose disease was found to be technically unresectable at operation as well as those patients who were approached with the intent of surgically palliating symptoms.
Factors examined for survival differences were age, sex, thickness and location of the primary lesion, disease-free interval (DFI; calculated from the time of operation for the primary lesion to the development of distant metastases) before diagnosis of stage IV disease, single- versus multiple-site metastases, and operative treatment received (complete vs. incomplete resection). Survival was calculated from the time of diagnosis of stage IV disease to death or last follow-up. Survival curves were generated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used for univariate and multivariate analysis. Proportions of prognostic factors and demographic variables between groups were compared by use of the
2 statistic or the Fishers exact test. Statistical significance was set at a P value of .05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
There was no operative mortality in this series. In the hepatic group, however, there were two deaths outside of the perioperative period. One of these was related to the operative procedure (multiple organ failure 2 months after a right hepatic lobectomy), but the other (cerebral vascular accident 3 months after a right hepatic lobectomy) probably was not. Complications occurred in four of the pancreatectomy patients (pancreatic fistula, small bowel obstruction secondary to an internal hernia, bile leak, and wound infection). Three complications occurred in the adrenalectomy group, including two bowel obstructions secondary to metastases and a pleural effusion requiring tube thoracostomy placement. There were no major complications in the splenectomy group.
Survival Analysis
For the 60 patients in operative group, the median survival was 20.9 months (range, 1112 months) and the 5-year survival 17%. In the 778-patient nonoperative group, the median survival was 9.6 months (range, 0.2214 months), whereas the 5-year survival was 7% (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Within the operative group, those who underwent complete (curative) resections had a median survival of 27.6 months (range, 1112 months) and a 5-year survival of 24%. This survival was significantly better (P = .0001) than in the group who had incomplete (palliative) surgical resections in which the median survival was only 8.4 months (Fig. 2). It is interesting that those who had incomplete resections fared no better than the nonoperative group (Fig. 2). There were no 5-year survivors in the incomplete resection group. Median DFS after complete resection was 15 months (range, 147 months). Of note, the 2-year DFS after complete resection was 53% for synchronous multisite metastases versus 26% for single-site metastases.
|
|
|
By univariate analysis, host features of age, sex, primary site, Breslow thickness, and DFI before stage IV diagnosis were not significant factors for survival differences among the complete and incomplete resection groups (Table 3). Only those patients undergoing complete surgical resection enjoyed improved survival by both univariate and multivariate analysis.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Outcome analysis of patients treated at the JWCI confirms the overall poor prognosis of stage IV melanoma. The median survival is best in patients with skin or subcutaneous involvement, and survival progressively decreases as more vitally important visceral organs are involved.8 Our group has previously demonstrated the survival advantage gained by complete resection of melanoma metastatic to the lung,9,10,18 the hollow viscous gastrointestinal tract,8 and the adrenal glands;16 we have also demonstrated improved survival after resection of recurrent stage IV melanoma.6 We also have recently reported the combined experience of the JWCI and the Sydney Melanoma Unit on hepatic resection for stage IV melanoma.17 Consistent in each of our studies is the survival advantage of complete resection of melanoma metastases. However, it is also consistent that as a whole, those undergoing incomplete resections survive no longer than those managed nonoperatively. Therefore, we are proponents of aggressive complete surgical resection to render the patient free of macroscopic disease whenever possible. Incomplete resections should only be undertaken for true palliation of symptoms, such as obstruction, hemorrhage, or pain, with the understanding that there is no survival benefit to leaving disease behind. Other institutions have a similar experience in the operative management of patients with stage IV melanoma.1,4,5,14,15 Median and 5-year survivals, respectively, of 19 to 25 months and 21% to 22% for lung, 15 to 49 months and 38% to 41% for gastrointestinal, and 13 to 24 months and 15% to 33% for combined organ site studies have been reported after complete resection of stage IV melanoma. The survival rates of this study are in line with those previously reported.
Our study is the first to demonstrate that improved survival may also be afforded by the complete resection of multiple organ-site metastases. Many of the previous studies,1,4,5 including our own involving a different organ site,10 have demonstrated that patients with single organ-site metastases have improved survival when compared with those with multiple organ-site metastases after complete resection. Although it is difficult to give firm recommendations on the basis of one retrospective study of a highly selected patient group, we believe that it is worthwhile to approach every patient as an individual and attempt to completely resect all disease, even if multiple organ sites are involved.
Early studies of the treatment of advanced stage melanoma with biochemotherapy have been encouraging, with reported response rates of 50% or higher.19 However, the durability of the responses has been somewhat disappointing. In a selected subset of stage IV patients believed not to be surgical candidates for complete resection, we have used preoperative biochemotherapy in a neoadjuvant fashion; a number of these patients have undergone complete surgical resection of their remaining disease after responses to biochemotherapy. The appropriateness of the postoperative adjuvant use of biochemotherapy is unknown.
Although complete metastasectomy provides a clinically complete remission, these patients have a high likelihood of subclinical systemic metastases, and thus an effective adjuvant systemic treatment is desirable. We have reported the promising results of our phase II trials investigating the therapeutic efficacy of CancerVax (CancerVax Corporation, Carlsbad, CA), a polyvalent melanoma cell vaccine in patients with distant melanoma metastases.20,21 An ongoing, multicenter phase III trial is investigating the possible therapeutic benefits of postoperative active immunization with CancerVax in those patients who have complete surgical resection of distant melanoma metastases. We have also proposed cytoreductive surgery as a form of immunotherapy in itself.22 By greatly reducing the patients tumor burden and the relative immunosuppression imposed on the host by the tumor, we hypothesize that the hosts immune antitumor response is able to more effectively deal with the residual micrometastases.
Surgical resection of melanoma metastatic to intra-abdominal organs can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Complete surgical resection results in improved OS in a highly selected group of patients. Complete resection of multiple organ-site metastases can result in OS rates similar to those after complete resection of single-organ site disease. In lieu of effective systemic treatment, we recommend aggressive complete surgical resection of melanoma metastatic to the liver, spleen, pancreas, and adrenal glands.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication March 16, 2001. Accepted for publication June 4, 2001.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. J. Collinson, T. K. Lam, W. M. J. Bruijn, J. H. W. de Wilt, M. Lamont, J. F. Thompson, and R. F. Kefford Long-term Survival and Occasional Regression of Distant Melanoma Metastases after Adrenal Metastasectomy Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1741 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. S Mackenzie, M. J Ashby, T. Donovan, D. D Voutnis, and M. J Brown Bilateral adrenal masses: phaeochromocytoma or melanoma? J R Soc Med, March 1, 2006; 99(3): 153 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sellner, N. Tykalsky, M. De Santis, J. Pont, and M. Klimpfinger Solitary and Multiple Isolated Metastases of Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma to the Pancreas: An Indication for Pancreatic Surgery Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 13(1): 75 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Finkelstein, J. A. Carrasquillo, J. M. Hoffman, B. Galen, P. Choyke, D. E. White, S. A. Rosenberg, and R. M. Sherry A Prospective Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma in Patients Undergoing Metastasectomy Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2004; 11(8): 731 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takeuchi, C. Kuo, D. L. Morton, H.-J. Wang, and D. S. B. Hoon Expression of Differentiation Melanoma-associated Antigen Genes Is Associated with Favorable Disease Outcome in Advanced-Stage Melanomas Cancer Res., January 15, 2003; 63(2): 441 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |