| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology (DCM), and the Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology (DSO), Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine; and the Department of Surgery (GFW, CDM, SJS), University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dougald C. MacGillivray, MD, Maine Surgical Care Group, PO Box 10990, 887 Congress Street, Portland, ME 04104; Fax: 207-774-9388; E-mail: mesurg{at}poa.mmc.org
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
6 cm compared with patients with smaller tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients who had a laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Patients were considered candidates for laparoscopic adrenalectomy if their computed tomography (CT) scan showed a well-encapsulated tumor confined to the adrenal gland.
Results: Sixty laparoscopic adrenalectomies were performed in 53 patients. Twelve of the adrenalectomies (20%) were for tumors that were
6 cm (median, 8 cm; range, 6 to 12 cm). There have been no local or regional recurrences, but one patient with adrenocortical carcinoma developed pulmonary metastases. When the 12 patients with large tumors were compared with the 36 patients with tumors <6 cm, the median operative time (190 vs. 180 minutes; P = .32), operative blood loss (100 vs. 50 mL; P = .53), and postoperative hospital stay (2 vs. 2 days; P = 1.0) were similar.
Conclusions: The size of an adrenal tumor should not be the primary factor in determining whether a laparoscopic adrenalectomy should be performed. Large adrenal tumors that are confined to the adrenal gland on CT can be removed with a laparoscopic approach.
Key Words: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy Adrenal tumors Pheochromocytoma Cushings syndrome
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
6 cm in size. | MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All laparoscopic adrenalectomies were performed with the lateral transperitoneal approach. The details of this approach have been described.2,14,15 The technique has been modified over the years as experience and equipment have improved. Usually four or five trocars were used for right-sided procedures, and three or four trocars were used for left-sided procedures. Five-millimeter trocars and the 5-mm harmonic scalpel are now used during the dissection and mobilization of the adrenal gland.
After the central adrenal vein was dissected, the 5-mm port that gave the best approach to the vein was exchanged for a 12-mm port to allow for the introduction of a large clip applier or vascular stapler to control the vein before it was divided. Gerotas fascia was incised, and all fat was cleared from the superior pole of the kidney and from the periadrenal region. Care was taken to identify and preserve any branches of the renal artery in the area of dissection and to leave as large a buffer of periadrenal fat as possible between the adrenal capsule and the laparoscopic instruments. The tissues medial to the adrenal gland were the first to be dissected. This allowed the adrenal gland to remain suspended by the lateral attachments to the abdominal wall and often eliminated the need for retraction of the gland. The capsule of the adrenal gland was never grasped. When the dissection was complete, the adrenal gland was placed into a plastic bag, the incision used for the 12-mm port was enlarged to the appropriate size, and the gland was removed intact. Fragmentation of the gland was never performed.
Operative time was defined as the time from skin preparation to closure of the skin incisions. Operative blood loss was measured from that collected in the suction device. The day of the operation was assigned as day 0 for the determination of postoperative hospital stay. Tumor size was measured on the uncut, fresh specimen with a ruler. Large adrenal tumors were defined as tumors that were
6 cm in size. Data were accrued from a prospectively maintained laparoscopic adrenalectomy database, office records, and phone contact with the patients or their physicians. The group of patients with large adrenal tumors was compared with the group of patients with tumors <6 cm in size. Comparisons between the two groups were performed with the Mann-Whitney U-test or the
2 test. A P value of <.05 was considered to represent a significant difference.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
6 cm in size. These tumors tended to be large, even in the group with smaller tumors, with a median size of 6.5 cm. Ten patients were classified as having nonfunctional adrenal tumors. Two of these patients had slight increases in their preoperative 24-hour urine metanephrines and underwent adrenalectomy for a presumed pheochromocytoma. When pathologic examination of their removed adrenal glands showed no evidence of a pheochromocytoma, they were classified as having nonfunctional tumors. Two other patients classified as having nonfunctional tumors probably had preclinical Cushings syndrome. These two patients had no evidence of autonomous cortisol production on their preoperative endocrine evaluation, but they became hypoadrenal after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Two patients had laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed for known metastatic carcinoma. One patient had an 11-cm adrenal metastasis from a nonsmall-cell carcinoma of the lung. This patient had severe flank and back pain that progressed despite a course of palliative radiotherapy (38 Gy) to this area. Her pain was completely relieved after laparoscopic adrenalectomy, and she remained pain free until her death from progressive disease. The second patient was receiving treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer. During this treatment, the adrenal metastasis was the only site to demonstrate progression. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed in an attempt to prolong his remission. This patient is alive with stable disease 11.5 months after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The patients with Cushings syndrome tended to have smaller tumors (median size, 3.7 cm). However, the one patient with Cushings syndrome and a large (9-cm) tumor had an adrenocortical carcinoma. The CT showed the tumor to be heterogeneous and to have a linear calcification but to be well encapsulated, with no evidence of extension into adjacent tissues and with no evidence of adenopathy. At operation there was no evidence of local invasion or adenopathy. On pathologic examination the tumor weighed 131 g and had areas of necrosis, high-grade cellular atypia, and vascular invasion. There was no evidence of extra-adrenal invasion, and no lymph nodes were found. This patient developed pulmonary metastases 18 months after her adrenalectomy. She is alive with stable pulmonary disease at 42 months after her adrenalectomy. There has been no evidence of local, regional, or trocar site recurrence.
|
Details concerning the operative time, operative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications are listed in Table 3. There were no differences in these parameters between the groups of patients with smaller and larger adrenal tumors, even though the patients with larger adrenal tumors often seemed to have more difficult and tedious procedures. Our first laparoscopic resection of a 6-cm adrenal tumor did not occur until after we had performed 22 laparoscopic adrenalectomies in patients with smaller adrenal tumors or hyperplastic adrenal glands. Thus, we had considerable experience with this procedure before we encountered patients with larger adrenal tumors, and this may have influenced our results.
|
The median follow-up for the entire group of patients was 33 months (range, 472 months). The median follow-up for patients with tumors <6 cm in size was 36 months (range, 472 months), and for patients with tumors of
6 cm it was 24.5 months (range, 442 months). Three patients, all with tumors <6 cm, were lost to follow-up. There has been complete follow-up for all patients with tumors
6 cm.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These concerns are not adequate justification for recommending open adrenalectomy for all patients with adrenal tumors
6 cm in size. Adrenocortical carcinoma and malignant pheochromocytoma are uncommon, whereas benign adrenal tumors are common. The prevalence of benign adrenal adenomas reported from autopsy series has been from 1.4% to 8.9%.17,18 The estimated annual incidence of adrenocortical carcinoma is two per million people,19 and only approximately 10% of pheochromocytomas are malignant. Although the size of an adrenal tumor has been shown to be an important indicator of the risk of its being malignant, many, if not most, large adrenal tumors are benign.18,2022 It has been estimated that for patients with adrenal tumors
6 cm in size, more than 60 adrenalectomies would have to be performed to remove 1 adrenocortical cancer.17 In addition, the risk of malignancy for smaller adrenal tumors may be greater than was previously appreciated. In a recent report, 13.5% of adrenocortical cancers were <5 cm, prompting this group to recommend that laparoscopic adrenalectomy be restricted to patients with functional adrenal tumors <3 cm in size.8 Thus, if size, as the prime predictor of an adrenal tumors being malignant, is the sole criterion on which the operative approach is based, many patients with large benign adrenal tumors will have an unnecessary open adrenalectomy, whereas the patients with small malignant tumors will have an inappropriate laparoscopic resection. What is most important is the ability of the surgeon to perform a safe and complete resection of the adrenal tumor, regardless of the operative approach or the size of the tumor.
We have used the CT findings of a well-encapsulated adrenal tumor with no evidence of invasion into surrounding tissue and no regional adenopathyrather than tumor size, internal imaging features, or functional statusin selecting patients for laparoscopic adrenalectomy. By using these selection criteria, we have been able to perform laparoscopic resection of adrenal tumors up to 12 cm in size. All of these tumors were removed intact and had negative resection margins. Despite the fact that the laparoscopic removal of these large tumors was technically challenging, the optical magnification and directed lighting provided by the laparoscope allowed for the careful and precise dissection of the adrenal glands with a margin of surrounding tissue. This allowed patients who had large adrenal tumors removed to experience the benefits that laparoscopic resection has afforded to patients with small adrenal tumors. There were no differences in the operative time, blood loss, complications, or postoperative hospital stay when this group was compared with the group of patients who had smaller tumors. There were no perioperative deaths, no conversions to open procedures, and no local, regional, or trocar site recurrences in any of the patients. Our results concur with others who have performed laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with large or malignant adrenal tumors (Table 4).
|
Wide en-bloc resection of the adrenal tumor and the surrounding periadrenal tissue is important in preventing recurrence and in improving survival in patients with malignant primary adrenal tumors.29 Our experience has shown this to be a consistent accomplishment in the laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors (up to 12 cm in size), provided that the preoperative CT shows the adrenal tumor to be well encapsulated, with no invasion into surrounding tissues. Despite the fact that all of our patients had complete resections, one patient had pulmonary metastases after laparoscopic resection of a 9-cm adrenocortical carcinoma. This patient is alive with stable pulmonary disease and no evidence of regional or trocar site recurrence 42 months after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Adrenocortical cancer is a virulent tumor, and local, regional, and distant recurrence commonly occurs even in patients with small tumors who have had complete resections with open procedures.8,2931
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy offers advantages, compared with open adrenalectomy, to the patient in terms of less postoperative pain and disability. It also offers advantages to the surgeon in terms of improved lighting, optical magnification, and exposure to an area that is often difficult to access with open operative approaches. The laparoscopic resection of a large adrenal tumor can be technically challenging, particularly when the tumor approaches 10 cm in size. Before attempting laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a patient with a large adrenal mass, the surgeon must have considerable experience with this procedure and a complete understanding of the anatomy of these regions.
The mere finding that an adrenal tumor is
6 cm in size need not be the primary factor in determining whether a laparoscopic resection is appropriate. If there is no evidence on preoperative imaging studies that the tumor is invasive, then even large adrenal tumors can be safely removed laparoscopically, provided that the surgeon has the requisite skills and experience.
Received for publication March 16, 2001. Accepted for publication March 5, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5 cm) adrenal masses. J Endourol 2000; 14: 14954.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. J. Collinson, T. K. Lam, W. M. J. Bruijn, J. H. W. de Wilt, M. Lamont, J. F. Thompson, and R. F. Kefford Long-term Survival and Occasional Regression of Distant Melanoma Metastases after Adrenal Metastasectomy Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1741 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Liao, S.-C. Chueh, M.-K. Lai, P.-J. Hsiao, and J. Chen Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Potentially Malignant Adrenal Tumors Greater than 5 Centimeters J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2006; 91(8): 3080 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Skarsgard and C. T. Albanese The Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy in Children Arch Surg, September 1, 2005; 140(9): 905 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mansmann, J. Lau, E. Balk, M. Rothberg, Y. Miyachi, and S. R. Bornstein The Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Mass: Update in Diagnosis and Management Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 309 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Jaroszewski, D. J. Tessier, R. T. Schlinkert, C. S. Grant, G. B. Thompson, J. A. van Heerden, D. R. Farley, S. L. Smith, and R. A. Hinder Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Pheochromocytoma Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2003; 78(12): 1501 - 1504. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |